Google Base Jumping
from the withholding-judgment dept
Well, the web is abuzz with the fact that the Google Base service has finally gone live after a few weeks of rumors. Looking over the service it seems to be both less and more than it promises to be -- and therefore it's tough to really come out with a detailed opinion about it just yet. Right now, honestly, it looks basically like an attempt to copy Craigslist. The folks at Google claim that's not their intent, and that's probably absolutely true. Google Base should be a lot more than a Craigslist clone, but the way it's set up, that's not going to be very clear to most people looking at it. In fact, it's not clear that it's even a very good Craigslist clone. The way it's set up seems likely to turn off less tech-savvy folks out there. With a bit of understanding how a database works, it's clear why they did certain things, but the average user doesn't care about those things. As someone just mentioned to me: "It's Craigslist without the community." Of course, hopefully it won't stay that way. As others have pointed out, the real value won't be clear until some time has gone by and we can see how people are really using it. With that in mind, it still seems pretty disappointing that, as it stands, this offering is a whole lot less than I originally expected. Offering an online database setup could be a great way to become a real platform for innovative apps developed by others. If Google was going for that, you'd expect them to be hyping up an API to plug into Google Base as a back end. They may eventually get there (you have to assume it's where they're going eventually), but initially, it's not really clear what Google Base wants to be -- and so they may need to do a little convincing to explain to people why they should use it. Of course, glancing over how it's set up right now, it's pretty clear that one group that will jump on the Google Base bandwagon quickly will be the spammers. It seems ripe for spam abuse, so it'll be worth watching how Google deals with that.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
When will there be Base with Class?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: When will there be Base with Class?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: When will there be Base with Class?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google Basing
2nd thing that to my mind was the good old "all your base" thingie.
Finally, after actually RTFA it came to mind that it could be something useful
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Google Basing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
google strikes again
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tech Dirt thinks like me
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Tech Dirt thinks like me
and thanks for spamming this comment section with your useless post!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Craigslist clone
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Craigslist clone
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Casual Engoogle
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Comment
Valnur
http://www.valnur.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]