Unintended Consequences, More Work For Mother, And Thinking Things Through

from the worth-thinking-about dept

One of the common themes around here is how rarely many industries think through the unintended consequences of their strategic decisions. If they were chess players, they'd be thinking only one (or possibly two) moves out, which is short-sighted enough, but even worse is that they're forgetting that the other side moves as well. It's an important thing to remember -- but it's easy to forget, thinking that everything else in the world remains the same, even after you do something. It's why the music industry celebrated after they shut down Napster, even though it really just meant that file sharing became bigger as it moved further underground (and, they're still making that mistake today, as they celebrate the death of Grokster and others). It's why a badly thought out anti-spam laws can make spam more of a problem and it's why a misused patent system can do more harm to innovation than help it.

A few days ago, we wrote about some of the unintended consequences of the DVR, getting plenty of people to watch more TV, and perhaps keeping the concept of the commercial alive -- despite fears from broadcasters of things going the other way. Over at the Future Now blog, they're discussing that story by putting it into context by trying to explain how the unintended consequences of technology very often lead to the opposite results from what you would think if you forget that the rest of the world reacts. The post discusses the book, More Work for Mother, which sounds like a perfect example of such unintended consequences. Over the past century there have been a number of innovations in the home when it comes to technology and appliances -- all of which were designed and advertised as "time saving." Yet, in many cases, just as much time is being spent on housework (and, yes, too often it's chauvinistically the woman who is doing most of that housework). As Future Now notes: "The big lesson is, to understand technologies, you've got to pay attention to how technologies fit into people's lives, and how they affect patterns of behavior -- not just what they're intended to do." It's all about understanding several moves out -- on all sides of the game, rather than just assuming that the rest of the world stands still.

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Bob3000, 18 Nov 2005 @ 4:50am

    Bad title

    Holy crap, that title ("More Work for Mother") is so outdated I can't even be bothered to click on the link 'cause I can't take them seriously.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Dana Tellier, 18 Nov 2005 @ 7:23am

      Re: Bad title

      Actually, you can't read the article anyway... nothing appears in the main window when you click the link.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Dana Tellier, 18 Nov 2005 @ 7:25am

    Bad link?

    The link for the article in question doesn't appear to be working correctly (the link to http://future.iftf.org/2005/11/more_work_for_m.html); either that, or they've changed their page around or removed the article.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Mike (profile), 18 Nov 2005 @ 8:58am

      Re: Bad link?

      Yeah it appears that the Future Now blog isn't working right now. I can't even get to the front page. As for not reading th earticle because the title seems outdated, um, that seems a little short sighted too. It's a *historical* look at how things changed from 1860 to 1960. You can learn a lot from history.

      Do you not read books about slavery because they're outdated?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Mike (profile), 18 Nov 2005 @ 2:09pm

      Re: Bad link?

      Btw, the link appears to be working again.

      link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.