VoiceGlo's Not Glowing Very Brightly

from the there-goes-that-plan dept

If you lived through the first internet bubble, a name you'll surely recall is TheGlobe.com -- a "community" site that never produced much of anything other than hype about its two young founders (some of which went straight to their heads) and which went public in 1998 with what was, at the time, the largest opening day pop seen in an IPO (coming off what was actually a slow period in IPOs). The company didn't have much substance behind it and the whole show collapsed pretty quickly. A year after the company had pretty much gone out of business, it was being used to host an online magazine about computer games -- when suddenly it was announced that the company had bought some "digital telephony assets" and had jumped into the suddenly hot VoIP arena. After recognizing that theGlobe.com name wasn't doing them any favors, they built up the company as VoiceGlo with a product called GloPhone -- which (at best) was a me too product with nothing much special about it. However, TheGlobe's original founder, Stephan Paternot, learned quite a bit about embellishing and hype during the first bubble, and couldn't resist doing the same for VoiceGlo, telling reporters they were first in the space when they were clearly late to the game. Last year the company was called out for putting out very misleading statements about their offering, trying to equate the number of downloads of their free software with actual users of competing products. Old hype dies hard, it seems. With Skype's acquisition marking off the height of any VoIP bubble, it looks like the folks back at theGlobe have decided to try to get out while the getting is good. Om Malik points out that the company has hung out a "for sale" sign and hired a firm to help them sell themselves. Of course, when companies publicly announce those sorts of things, it generally means they're desperate to sell out because they're in trouble. Looks like, once again, TheGlobe was full of hype and little substance.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    James, 5 Apr 2007 @ 6:40pm

    I used to work for them.

    Doesn't surprise me at all. There was never any substance to that company. They spent a lot of money though, if I was an investor I would be really pissed

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.