Judge Imposes Useless Restriction On Kazaa
from the this-will-help-how? dept
We've recently been knocking politicians for their legislating about technology without bothering to actually understand technology. The discussion certainly applies to judges in technology cases as well. A long time ago, we wondered if there should be special high tech courts, and while that idea never gained much traction, it's still painful to see technology-clueless judges make decisions that are pointless. Take, for example, the latest ruling in Australia in the case against Sharman Networks, the owners of the Kazaa file sharing system. The judge has demanded that Kazaa start blocking out searches on a list of 10,000 musician names, as supplied by the recording industry. This is silly and pointless for two very easy to understand reasons. First, this is the identical prohibition that was placed on the original Napster in 2001 -- and we all know what happened there. People immediately started adjusting how they named songs and musicians to get around these filters. The second silly thing about this ruling is that it only applies to new versions of Kazaa that are downloaded -- but no one's going to download them knowing that it offers these annoying filters. In fact, the press is already warning people not to upgrade Kazaa. The judge's solution? Sharman is expected "to place maximum pressure on KMD [Kazaa Media Desktop] users to obtain the updated release." Yes, that's right. To convince people to download the crippled versions of Kazaa, Kazaa is supposed to "place maximum pressure" on current users (i.e., trick them) to download the crippled version, replacing the fully functional version. It seems that the folks at Sharman tried to explain how silly all this is to the judge, and even suggested that they use Audible Magic's audio fingerprinting system -- but noted it would take time to re-architect their solution to work with Audible Magic. The judge, amusingly, questions how well Audible Magic's technology works (which is a reasonable question), but still seems to think that this keyword blocking solution is a reasonable compromise.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Audio tagging
Their tagger is sometimes spot on. Sometimes (thanks to conflicting data) gets the music so woefully wrong it's funny - but with a larger corpus of data I imagine it would only improve
And their tool does help keep my MB of (my own) backed up CDs organised when I'm too lazy to key in the titles and CDDB didn't recognise them when I originally ripped them !
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A Legal Version the Ig Nobel Awards?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
1Anarchy_Creator - oh noes they're on to us.mp3
[ link to this | view in chronology ]