Perhaps Newspapers Should Stop Looking Back, And Start Looking Forward
from the just-a-suggestion dept
For all the reports about how the newspaper business is in trouble, the situation hasn't yet become as dire as some make it out to be. However, that's not stopping plenty of hand-wringing. That could be good if those newspapers were coming up with innovative solutions. The amusing part, though, is how so much of the discussion is looking backwards at what the industry did wrong and whining about it, rather than what they can do in the future. For example, we see complaints about how newspapers never should have given away content for free online. This makes little sense for a variety of reasons. If newspapers had started out by charging, most of them would have discovered exactly what the few news organizations that charged early on discovered: unless you were the WSJ, breaking news that people can make money on, almost no one would pay. Just ask Microsoft how their experiment with Slate went initially. In the meantime, we keep hearing about sites starting to make more money out of online ads by getting increasing amounts of traffic. Notice that AOL (which is basically a "charge for content" type of company) has moved away from the walled garden mentality? Either way, who cares what the newspapers should have done years ago. It's too late now. However, other suggestions aren't much better. The idea that newspaper should learn things from Hollywood is particularly laughable. Exactly how has Hollywood "adapted" to the internet age? They're being dragged, kicking and screaming, all the way. The actual article talks more about how Hollywood "embraced" DVDs, but that was only after a very long fight. Following the Hollywood reaction seems like the last thing you should recommend.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
We do get paid to tell this to their faces. Techdirt Corporate Intelligence. :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Remember A.M. Radio?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
god
[ link to this | view in chronology ]