The Problem With Thinking Anyone Owns Ideas
from the figure-this-one-out dept
We're always discussing all sorts of intellectual property issues around here -- and one of the key problems comes down to the fundamental problem of trying to somehow shackle "ideas" down -- as if that were possible. Not only do ideas spread and change and grow -- but it's quite likely that multiple people have the same ideas at the same time. Giving the "rights" to any one person is problematic. For a perfect example, look at a new lawsuit that's coming to light today. A video game developer is suing gaming giant Electronic Arts, claiming they stole his idea and put it into their popular Madden football video gaming series. He says he presented the idea to EA in late 2003, and now it's shown up in the latest version -- therefore, they must have "stolen" it from him. Of course, the easy response is that the big "idea" wasn't even that original. It was that, within the game, players could manage a specific athlete, handling all sorts of activities like sports practice, family life and doing home work. Of course, at the same time he was showing of "his" idea to EA, I was actually playing a game that let you do just that -- just in baseball, not football. The creator of a (very cool, and extremely addictive) popular baseball simulation game, Out of the Park Baseball, created a sort of "companion" game in 2003 called Inside the Park Baseball, where the idea was that you took on the role of a player, and managed just that player through his career, including things like working out, going out to the bars, family life, etc. That game never really caught on, but does that mean anyone "owns" that idea and can sue over it?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
He wants money
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
have you ever been screwed ?
have you ever presented your design to a large
company, heard "not interested in outside submissions" and then saw your design inplemented in the next resealse of the big company's product ?
Do you know how it feels to be cheated and screwed ?
Apparently, you don't.
Keep bitching about patent and copyright laws then...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: have you ever been screwed ?
have you ever presented your design to a large
company, heard "not interested in outside submissions" and then saw your design inplemented in the next resealse of the big company's product ?
Funny you say that. Actually I have. When I worked for a small startup a decade or so ago, we went and pitched a well-known large company on an idea, where we would supply the work for them. They said they'd think about it and proceeded to ignore us. A year later, they launched the same thing.
And, you know what? I didn't have a problem with that. We never should have tried to route through them. We should have just done it on our own and competed directly with them. We could have done a much better job.
So, the real answer to your question is that, yes, I know what it's like to compete in a business environment, and I understand that no one owns ideas.
Any other incorrect assumptions you want to make?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: have you ever been screwed ?
Since then, I've seen a number of companies build what we were hoping to build, and raise a ton of money from those same VCs.
Am I pissed? Nope. The VCs were right. Our idea was good, but the timing wasn't right and we were missing a bit of the expertise that would have been needed. The companies in that space now are doing a much better job of it. Do I think the VCs may have passed on our idea? I doubt they did it consciously, but I certainly see elements of it. But, these other firms were able to execute where we were unable to. Why should I begrudge them of that?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No copyright violation here
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No copyright violation here
Yeah, I agree. He doesn't seem to be claiming copyright on it or anything. But, it'll be awfully difficult for him to convince anyone that there's a contract there.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
Then he went and pitched that “idea” to a video game executive who thought to himself “Yup, we have seen the sims too, jack-o” and said “tank you, we will call you... NEXT!”
And now the guy wants to get paid for having an “idea?”
If this were a real idea, I might feel sorry for him.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I agree.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My Thoughts
Also, as-near-as-I-can-tell-but-I'm-not-a-lawyer, there were existing games with this ability, even at least one sports game. I don't think it counts as 'original' to take an idea from sim baseball and pitch it as your own in sim football.
Finally, yes, I did have an idea that I've just seen on the market. We came up with the idea for a lighted, electronic sign with some pre-programmed phrases for the car back in the late 70's. Even though the tech wasn't there yet we realized that it would be too easy to hack it to put in objectionable language, so we dropped it. I'm not insensitive to the little guy, I just don't think this is the one to take a stand on.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
nobody owns an Idea?
while many people can have the same idea at any given time, the people who go through the process of gaining official ownership of the idea are the ones who get the credit, and rightly so.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: nobody owns an Idea?
Um. Why? Because they filled out some forms and paid some lawyers they should get a monopoly over an idea that others came up with independently? How is that fair?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: nobody owns an Idea?
If we regard IP as "territory" that we conquer and need to protect (as we should), then we need
to have a strategy to defend that territory once we assert control over it. Otherwise - sheep to the slaughter. Recommendation: do not take good ideas to those with the power to implement them, rather study how others have protected their ideas and developed them themselves?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: nobody owns an Idea?
Again, why? This makes almost no sense. Many separate people can come up with the same idea at the same time. That's not true of "territory" to be "conquered". Why is it fair to give full control of the idea to one person, when others had the same idea -- and perhaps could do much more with it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: nobody owns an Idea?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Journalism
I just wanted to point out that this sort of thing happens in freelance journalism (my field) all the time. That is, ideas are allegedly "stolen" all the time. On one board I read often, mediabistro.com, every six months or so somebody brings up an argument about a major magazine or newspaper stealing their ideas. The argument is always the same, circumstantial case: "I pitched an idea to X, and four months later, they ran the same story! I wuz robbed!"
I had that same circumstantial case happen to me at a major newspaper. I pitched them on an idea, they said no, and another section of the paper ran the same story, same angle, three weeks later. I started to get all in a huff about it, but then I pitched an article to a magazine, a trend piece with a very specific angle and three items, and they told me they already had the exact piece in the works. One month later (shorter than their lead time), they ran the same piece, same angle, 2/3 same examples--even a similar headline. But I know it was just coincedence.
So, yes, basically, I think people think they have great ideas all the time that nobody else could, but other people can, and do--all the time.
Ethan
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Opinion" The Problem With Thinking Anyone Owns Id
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Read an IP Law Primer
And a contract can cover anything two parties mutually consent to. If there is no mutual consent - if the big company didn't agree to anything - then the guy loses out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Problem With Thinking Anyone Owns Ideas
[ link to this | view in chronology ]