Is Providing Accurate Whois Info Really That Important?

from the just-wondering dept

Yesterday, Carlo noted that lots of folks were rushing to lay claim to the sex.eu domain name -- but how many do you think handed out fake personal info? A concern of the US government for years has been that people didn't have accurate info associated with domains that they owned -- even to the point that ICANN once said they would start deleting domain names with false contact info. The US government has been studying the matter, and has concluded that 2.31 million domain names have been registered with "patently false" information. Another 1.64 million had "incomplete information." Of course, this is all based on a sample size of... 900 -- so some might argue about whether that's a fair sample. Still, is this really (a) surprising or (b) that bad? There are two main reasons why it's happening. First, the whois database has long been a great source for spammers. Having info there means you're going to get spam and snail mail junk mail -- so it's no wonder that people put in false info. Second, keeping that info up-to-date is a pain if you move regularly. Many people set it up and then never change it -- not thinking it's very important. That's because it's not very important. Meanwhile, with firms that claim to offer "anonymous" domain registration freely giving up your personal info, isn't it just easier for people to fake it? Why is it so important to provide accurate information to register a domain name?
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Dec 2005 @ 3:12am

    No Subject Given

    Whats the point of keeping updated correct information in your domain whois? The people you've registered the domain with, obviously have your credit card details or other personal information required when you first registered it. What reason would anyone else have, to contact you for? If you wanted to be contacted, you would have your information readily available to people. And if you don't want to be contacted, why should you be required to post your address to the WORLD WIDE PUBLIC INTERNET, free for any (loony/psycho) person to use for their enjoyment/gains.

    I want a telephone, but I don't want my phone number posted in the public telephone books... for the same reasons that wouldnt want any of my information posted to the public internet whois.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Dec 2005 @ 4:09am

    Why it's so important to provide accurate contact

    Because ownership of a network object -- whether
    it's a domain or an ASN or something else -- means
    that the person(s) involved are not merely using
    the Internet, they are *operating* the Internet.
    That requires taking full personal responsibility.
    Anyone who isn't up to that does not deserve the
    privilege of running (a part of) our Internet.
    (Note carefully: I have no problem with anonymous
    *use* of the Internet; in fact, I fully support it. But "use" != "operation" and those who do
    not fully comprehend the difference should not
    be permitted the privilege of doing the latter.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 8 Dec 2005 @ 4:23am

      Re: Why it's so important to provide accurate cont

      "operation of" and "control over" are also two different things.

      One performs a function and the other exercises authoritative or dominating influence over.

      Why should the one performing the function, be limited to how that function is done when in fact, those who operate the internet have no dominating control over it's existence.

      ...semantics are wonderful, aren't they!

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Aaron Friel, 8 Dec 2005 @ 4:37am

    No Subject Given

    How can the US Gov't declare anything patently false?!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Brian Bartlett, 8 Dec 2005 @ 6:33am

    No Subject Given

    I keep mine up to date on all three of my domains and don't see a problem with it. First off the SPAM argument is a non-starter in my book. The amount of SPAM I get across all three of those domains is far less than I get in one day on, say, my Hotmail account. As for the US government knowing about me that bothers me not at all as I've had zero privacy with respect to them since the day I entered the service. (We'll leave it right there.) I simply consider keeping my WhoIs information current right up with the level of keeping, say, my DMV or property tax information current. Expectations of privacy, especially in the context of the internet, are illusory at best. Get yourself a tinfoil hat if you think you have it today. You don't.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    statistician with too much time, 8 Dec 2005 @ 7:36am

    No Subject Given

    On a technical note, the sample size is more than sufficient assuming the data they collected was valid. 1300 is considered the maximum usefull sample size for populations in the order of 275 million(i.e. the U.S.) - 900 is ample for 2.3 million.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    anonymous coward, 8 Dec 2005 @ 11:18am

    Of course they want you to register...

    That way, if you do something the government doesn't like, or that they disagree with, they can come after you!
    Sorry, that's the cynic in me coming out.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Dec 2005 @ 1:41pm

    "anonymous" registration is a myth, anyway + a spa

    You do realize that supposedly-anonymous domain
    registration is no such thing, right?

    That anyone armed with appropriate legal authority
    can lay their hands on it -- probably without
    notice to you?

    That your registrar -- and thus their employees --
    have access to your "real" data. What stops them
    from selling it, in bulk, to...anyone? What stops
    their employees from selling it under the table?

    And how good do you think their security is? Do
    you think it's good enough to defeat everyone who
    might have an interest in acquiring that data?
    If you do, what basis do you have for that belief?

    "anonymous" registration merely presents the
    facade of privacy; it's really nothing of the kind.

    As to spam: yes, registering a domain and putting
    your real address on it may expose you to (more)
    spam. If you have decent anti-spam measures in
    place, then this shouldn't be an issue. Consider
    it part of the cost of having a domain, and if you
    don't like paying that cost, then do your part to
    stop spam -- because it benefits all of us.

    If you can't handle that, then you're probably not
    ready to be a (partial) operator of the Internet.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Jamie, 9 Dec 2005 @ 7:10am

    Accountability

    Ultimately someone needs to be held accountable. Although I agree that privacy is important, if there was no mechanism for accountability then there would be rampant problems.

    I good example of this is the wikipedia and other open source movements. When more than one voice can be used to discribe a problem or a solution, we ultimately all gain from a more complete answer.

    If we can all see the person responsible for a website, we all have a better chance of getting our message across. for example: I love your website, but I don't love your spam.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.