Cheating Google... Or Why Pay Per Click Isn't Always The Best Model

from the just-saying dept

Chris "Long Tail" Anderson has an amusing post on his blog about how he's "cheating Google" with an advertisement he's running via Google's AdWords program. The "scheme" works as follows: he's written a pretty bad ad on obscure keywords -- which never gets clicked on. Of course, part of Google's AdWords juju is that if your ad never gets clicked on, they yank it. However, you can re-enable the ad by raising how much you're willing to pay per click. Of course, as Chris points out, that doesn't matter at all if no one is ever going to click on your ad. So, instead, you're getting "free impressions" -- though, the effectiveness of those impressions is rightly questioned. Either way (and Anderson is mostly joking), this does highlight some of the limitations of "pay-per-click/call/action" advertising. We get companies pitching us almost daily on some sort of pay-per-action advertising -- knowing full well that very few people are ever going to buy. What they'd be getting, instead, is a ton of free brand-building. Later on that can be useful to them -- but we certainly don't get a cut of that. That isn't to say these types of ad programs don't have their place, but there are limitations to them, and its why many publishers still feel a lot more comfortable with traditional CPM advertising. Advertising isn't just about the immediate action.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Colin, 14 Dec 2005 @ 5:18am

    Google Ad Cheating

    But they still have to read the ad and elaborate on it enough to remember it...I find that I don't even see ads a lot of the time anymore. It's like watching a movie in widescreen and not seeing the borders...if you have a good eye, you can recognize where the ads go and what they look like peripherally, and just kinda zone 'em out. Y'know?

    -Kas

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    johnny, 14 Dec 2005 @ 5:36am

    The google adwords needs some updates

    THe google adwords needs some updates in advertizing system, like lowering pey per click cost and increasing CPM advertizing. my blogs Tech News Blog and Cheap Averatec laptop review

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    sharp, 14 Dec 2005 @ 5:50am

    Re: Google Ad Cheating

    OMG how long has that webex ad been there? ;)

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    X-Advertiser, 14 Dec 2005 @ 6:21am

    No Subject Given

    Ummm, ya, ok, but every third time you re-enable your add after Google kicks it they charge you $5! So unless they have changed something in the last six months, I hardly call that "free".
    Facts check please. ^_^

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Michael Birnholz, 14 Dec 2005 @ 6:32am

    PPC - Action Advertising

    We run an Automotive eCommerce company. All of our clients are after the same traffic (those looking for car parts). I can say that Adwords and Yahoo/Overture PPC make or break my clients businesses. I do not agree at all that PPC does not work. In fact it works for all involved. There is NO way to get your site ranked in the top 10 on a major engine for a competitive keyword. SEO only works for phrases that make no sense. Of course, we all know that the engines themselves surely benefit the most from PPC, but it is no different than traditional media.

    Lastly, I will pose a question to you all. Does dot-com branding really work anymore, anyway? When there are ten pages of the essentially the same site, or affiliate site hawing the same products at just about the same prices, do the consumers actually 'buy' the brand or the price?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Subliminal Mindset, 14 Dec 2005 @ 6:59am

    Re: PPC - Action Advertising

    i do think people are dot com branded. i for one _always_ use newegg to buy computer parts, even if it is a dollar cheaper somewhere else.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Shoal Creek, 14 Dec 2005 @ 7:34am

    Re: PPC - Action Advertising

    You're right. Newegg does not always have the cheapest price on many things, but their service is very reliable and the shipping is fast and inexpensive. If a defective part gets shipped, you know you can ship it back to Newegg without a lot of hastle. Most people that shop Newegg recognize the brand as a safe company with whom to work.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Ivan Sick, 14 Dec 2005 @ 8:51am

    Re: The google adwords needs some updates

    I'm not looking at your blog because your spelling/typing is so atrocious. Reading your two-line post made my head hurt.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. icon
    Mike (profile), 14 Dec 2005 @ 9:11am

    Re: PPC - Action Advertising

    I do not agree at all that PPC does not work. In fact it works for all involved.

    I never said that PPC doesn't work. I said that it's not *always* the right thing for *publishers*. You're talking about advertisers. In fact, the point was that advertisers often get a better deal out of it because they don't have to pay for branding.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  10. identicon
    slex, 14 Dec 2005 @ 1:45pm

    Re: Google Ad Cheating

    Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

    link to this | view in thread ]

  11. identicon
    Alex, 14 Dec 2005 @ 1:46pm

    Re: Google Ad Cheating

    Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr and rowr join http://www.Animetribe.com

    link to this | view in thread ]

  12. identicon
    anna, 19 Feb 2014 @ 5:24pm

    I heard a company named results driven marketing does free negative keyword audits i would recommend talking to them at 888-642-6026

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.