Google Gets Its Groove On... But Are They Breaking The Law?
from the sing-a-song-for-google dept
It's been rumored forever, but Google is finally launching their music offering. As we mentioned many months ago, the plan is not to offer their own music store, but to link to iTunes and others. Remember that phrase: "iTunes and others," because that seems to be the key. The rumor we mentioned back in the summer was that it was just iTunes, and we wondered how the "others" would feel about that. While it does seem like Google is going to be favoring iTunes, the News.com report quotes Google's Marissa Mayer (who seems to have a different title in every story I see about her) saying that they'll be "getting people to the iTunes store"... and then News.com adds in the "and others." According to another report, the retailer Google sends you to will be determined by a number of different factors, but overall rank and relevance are important -- meaning iTunes is likely to come out on top most of the time. Either way, Google doesn't get a cut of any music sales -- but they (of course) do make money on any related ads. Meanwhile, the more interesting part of the story is that Google will also be pointing people to lyrics. Just a week ago, we had a story about music publisher Warner/Chappell shutting down Pearlyrics, a system that did exactly the same thing. Anyone want to take bets on whether or not Warner/Chappell or some other music publisher will now start suing Google? Also, since some in the recording industry are now saying that anyone who publishes lyrics online deserves to go to jail, couldn't some interpret this new effort as inducement to infringe? Yes, it seems stupid to think of it that way, but it does seem to highlight one of the major problems with the Supreme Court's decision in the Grokster case.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Affilliates get a cut
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'd love to see Google get sued...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It seems to be working right now...
Pretty neat, but I probably won't use it that much.
— lar3ry
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
overreacting?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
Actually, this is not new. One of the original lyrics sites, an ftp server in Europe, was taken offline due to threats of legal action by the Harry Fox Agency in the USA.
I've been waiting for this shoe to drop for years, actually. The claim was that the lyrics server had links to banner ads, so it was a "commercial site" and was "making money off the distribution of copyrighted lyrics," despite the fact that it was run as profit-null (money from the ads only paid for wear and tear on the server).
With all those lyrics sites on the web nowadays, it seemed to me that they were just begging for trouble.
Heck, if the music industry heads had their way, they'd sue anybody who even whistled a popular tune!
— lar3ry
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
If you follow the links, you'll see it's not overreacting at all:
The music industry is to extend its copyright war by taking legal action against websites offering unlicensed song scores and lyrics.
The Music Publishers' Association (MPA), which represents US sheet music companies, will launch its first campaign against such sites in 2006.
MPA president Lauren Keiser said he wanted site owners to be jailed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]