Why Average Revenue Per User Can Be Misleading
from the not-this-again dept
In the telco world, there's an ongoing infatuation with "ARPU" (Average Revenue Per User, for those just joining us). It's a stat that execs obsess over. Wall Street talks about which operators have the highest or lowest ARPUs and which direction the ARPU moves every quarter or year. ARPU can be useful in some ways, but the level to which it's relied on as an indicator of how successful an operator is can be quite problematic. Take, for example, a new study that is warning that while voice ARPU is declining and data ARPU is increasing for mobile operators, the increase in data ARPU isn't closing the gap created by the losses in voice ARPU. This leads to execs thinking that they need to figure out ways to quickly increase data ARPU or slow the decline in voice ARPU -- which could be a strategic mistake. First of all, as markets get more mature, operators are increasingly looking towards the margins to pick up new customers who have never had service before. In most cases, those subscribers are going to want cheap intro plans to see why it's worthwhile. In other words, those customers drive down ARPU, but increase incremental revenue. That should be good, but is seen as bad. Meanwhile, when it comes to data ARPU, the industry still hasn't done a great job convincing many users why or how they should use mobile data offerings. Keeping the barriers low helps to get more people experimenting and seeing the benefits of mobile data usage -- even if it keeps data ARPU low. Pushing up the rates too quickly means that you cut off a large segment of the potential market -- or open them up to a competitor who isn't as infatuated with meeting certain ARPU standards.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Dog Sushi Economics
http://www.mainichi-msn.co.jp/today/news/20051217k0000m040133000c.html
If the chef had online delivery services, he might not have had to dump 30 heads next to a prison.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why it's important
The marginal users that telecoms are acquiring today are also more expensive to acquire (they need more convincing, greater incentive, etc). So they end up with increasing costs to acquire the marginal user but lower ARPU.
Obviously, this game runs out somewhere, where the marginal users are no longer profitable. One way that companies use to mask/delay the fact that their new users aren't profitable anymore is by emphasizing the new services for their existing users. Slow data uptake means that this game has far less impact than is touted by management, and is enormously important.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why it's important
[ link to this | view in chronology ]