Music Publisher Sorta Kinda Apologizes For Bogus Threat To Lyrics App
from the you-mean-we-have-to-follow-the-law? dept
Last week we wrote about music publisher Warner/Chappell shooting first and asking questions later by having its lawyers ship off the standard cease-and-desist-you're-infringing letter to pearLyrics, makers of a funky little app that helps you find any online lyrics to the songs you're listening to in iTunes. They're not publishing the lyrics themselves, but simply searching for them and displaying them -- which is why we wondered if Warner/Chappell would sue Google, since their new music search does essentially the same thing. Earlier this week, the EFF decided that W/C's lawyers might benefit by having the law explained to them, including the nice little tidbit about how they open themselves up to federal liability if they were found to have made "a knowing misrepresentation as applied to noninfringing activity." W/C's lawyers slept on this idea for a day or so, and realized it was time to start backpedaling quickly. The EFF informs us that W/C and pearLyrics have put out a joint statement, whereby W/C blusters for a bit about good intentions and such, before admitting that they made a mistake. Still, it's a pretty weak resolution. W/C now claims it only wanted to make sure that pearLyrics really wasn't infringing, and the letter was a bad way to do that. However, it's not clear if pearLyrics is coming back online -- and W/C made it clear that it's still not thrilled with the idea that lyrics sites somehow "undermine" accurate lyrics. If that's the case, it kinda makes you wonder what the lawyers and execs over at Warner/Chappell think of KissThisGuy.com, an archive of misheard lyrics -- whose whole purpose is to undermine accurate lyrics. And, yet, we're still confused about how writing down lyrics is likely to harm the music publishing business in any way.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Lyrics - copyrights - greed & stupidity
learn' the words. So restricting access to the words is greed & stupity. Wierd AL had to stop doing parodies because of changes in the copyright law. Sampling is under fire for using snippets of recordings. The music industry in its efforts to swallow the world is consuming itself.
If you want to watch the fur fly compare a hymnal from 30 to 50 years ago with the songs of todays Gospel singers. If there is more than 12% to 15% match then they own the performance but not the song. If asked the companies tend to lie first and threaten to sue second. Words are everything.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lyrics - copyrights - greed & stupidity
As a teenager, I never bought any albums just to be able to read the lyrics - and I've never met anyone who bought albums for that reason.
I have all of Weird Al's albums, and even the most recent one is full of parodies - all of which are covered by Fair Use.
The only time he's ever had an issue was with Coolio over Gangster's Paradise - Al thought he had permission (which he doesn't need but always asks for as a courtesy) and it turns out he didn't. Coolio got upset, but there wasn't anything he could do about it because what Al had done was not illegal.
Get your facts straight, put down the pipe, and come back when you know what you're talking about, 'kay?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A shame.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lyric sites are the next step
With adverts, it is a no-brainer for the publishers to prove that the sites are "stealing" the money that is due to them.
For now, a Google search for lyrics "Bell Bottom Blues" will still reveal all the sites that have the lyrics (without having to use Google's new music service). And tomorrow, the lyrics sites will be crying, "I don't want to fade away..."
— lar3ry
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lyric sites are the next step
Well, okay, actually Google gets link takedown notices I think for even linking to copyrighted info. IMHO, that is really rediculous.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]