Tiny Microsoft Subsidiary Most Profitable Company In Ireland
More Class Action Lawsuits Against Sneaky Install Adware Firms

Will Fixing The Internet Break It?

Predictions

from the ain't-broke... dept

Wed, Dec 21st 2005 1:48am — Mike Masnick
MIT's Tech Review is running the third part in its three part series about the "broken internet." The first part described plans to build a new, better internet. The second part discussed the overall problems with the internet as is, and why it could use an overhaul. In both of those stories, we wondered (a) how real the problem really was (as we've all been hearing internet doom stories for a decade or so) and (b) about the unintended consequences of trying to actually anticipate all of the problems that could come up in building a brand new internet. It's the unintended consequences of believing you can pre-think through all of the potential problems that seems the most troublesome. Luckily, the third part of the series at least mentions that some experts believe this plan to create a new internet infrastructure could be quite harmful. The internet worked because it was "dumb" and didn't include many smarts. While lots of companies are looking to build the smarts back into the network, building a smarter architecture from scratch seems destined to cause more problems than it solves. The "smartness" means limitations, and it's impossible to predict what we'd really want the internet to do eventually. Those limitations are going to cause quite a bit of frustration.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

37 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 21 Dec 2005 @ 4:46am

    No Subject Given

    i got first post!!!!! besides that, i do actually have something to say... i got into MIT starting as a freshman in the 2006-2007 school year, and i'll be majoring in ocmputer science and engineering. and i'd just like to say... dont knock the MIT ppl, b/c we smart as heelll :D

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      fuzzix, 21 Dec 2005 @ 5:19am

      Re: No Subject Given

      Yeah, your post is certainly an indication of that.

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Chris H, 21 Dec 2005 @ 5:20am

      Re: No Subject Given

      "i got first post!!!!! besides that, i do actually have something to say... i got into MIT starting as a freshman in the 2006-2007 school year, and i'll be majoring in ocmputer science and engineering. and i'd just like to say... dont knock the MIT ppl, b/c we smart as heelll :D"

      ...wow

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Bobby Cannon, 21 Dec 2005 @ 5:52am

      KISS

      I like the idea of keeping things simple and allowing the room for creating new products and technologies. All I can see is a "smarter" internet that limits what we can do. Oh and don't admit to be a MIT student and not proof read your post before submitting them. :)

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 21 Dec 2005 @ 5:53am

      Re: No Subject Given

      to the first poster: juuuuust a bit off-topic, but um.. a worthy contribution nontheless =)

      Just remember, once you start classes, you might want to drop the ego as it will inhibit learning (trust me, I know).

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 21 Dec 2005 @ 5:58am

      Re: No Subject Given

      Money can get you into any school. Your post is evidence of this.

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 21 Dec 2005 @ 6:23am

      Re: No Subject Given

      You know, the google toolbar could spellcheck that for ya!

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      eeptool, 21 Dec 2005 @ 6:27am

      Re: No Subject Given

      Impressive spelling. I didn't know that MIT had a "ocmputer science" department. Is that the same as Course 6-3 or have they changed the names as well as the numbers since I've been there.
      I surmise that you will have fun telling people you went to MIT until the day you die, but being admitted is not the same as graduating.
      Hopefully you will be able to tell people you graduated as well, but don't blow your load too soon because you haven't gotten past the 6.001 course. LISP is such a wonderful language for recursion and general mayhem, but it is a bugger.
      So in closing, good luck at MIT and don't be suprised if one day you are part of that 50% of the incoming class that flunk out to which they say: "Leave, and don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out!"

      Have a Day,
      eeptool, MIT Class of 1990

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Harry Bools, 21 Dec 2005 @ 8:05am

        Re: No Subject Given

        And I hate to say this, but MIT isn't what it was in 1990. After all, they let little turds like Mr. "smart as heelllll" in. I've been back recently, and they just dumped 400 million into the design and building of their new cognative sciences (stata) building. What a waste of money. I mean come on, 400 million. How many kids in Africa could have had a real education and a real chance at life for that much money? But no. They saw fit to spend it on making their new building look like it came out of a Dr. Seuss book.

        here's a link:
        http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2004/stata-open.html

        [ link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          GZ, 21 Dec 2005 @ 9:15am

          Re: No Subject Given

          Hey this isn't funny.
          You went to MIT and you can't post a link properly?

          [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      anon, 21 Dec 2005 @ 6:32am

      Re: No Subject Given

      You might be smart, but apparently you can't spell.

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Old Skool Hack3r, 21 Dec 2005 @ 8:09am

      The state of up and coming computer techs.......

      To the first poster....... You are a fine example of why companies in America are resorting to outsorcing our tech jobs to place where the people can't speak English ( India ). And you know what......... I could probably communicate with them in a more meaningful way than I ever could a so called l33t like you. Crawl back under the chip you emerged from.

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Shbe, 21 Dec 2005 @ 8:43am

        Re: The state of up and coming computer techs.....

        OMG the OP is a troll. Get a clue

        I worry about today's techs.

        [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      titanandrews, 21 Dec 2005 @ 8:50am

      Re: No Subject Given

      Yes, we can all see how smart you are. You can't even spell.

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 21 Dec 2005 @ 9:59am

      Re: No Subject Given

      poo

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      DittoBox, 21 Dec 2005 @ 11:39am

      Re: No Subject Given

      In typical slashdot style I shall descend like a vulture to gather up my unawares prey:

      Right. You won't last a week in MIT with that quality understanding of English.

      'heell'? 'ocmputer'?

      MIT must be getting desperate...

      PS: :P

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 18 Jan 2006 @ 12:55pm

      Re: No Subject Given

      How did you get into MIT with that kind of spelling. Sheesh.

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Oliver Wendell Jones, 21 Dec 2005 @ 4:56am

    I wonder who it is who really wants to *fix* the i

    I can't help but wonder if organizations like the RIAA, MPAA, Christian Parents Against People Having Fun Anywhere, etc. aren't the people who want to "Fix" the internet by making it impossible to share music, movies, porn, violent video games, etc.

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Pirtle, 21 Dec 2005 @ 5:23am

    No Subject Given

    Speed is the only thing that needs to be upgraded. Only reason to rebuild the internet is if some sort of speed boundary is reached. I would be too afraid of the outcome to support doing a complete overhaul.

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Brannen Taylor, 21 Dec 2005 @ 5:38am

    KISS method

    I guess MIT does not equal KISS (Keep It Simple Stupid)

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    bigboi, 21 Dec 2005 @ 6:17am

    No Subject Given

    i think having a more structured architecture would help developers with some of the current inconsistencies, but i'm like the other guy. i would hate to think what "built-in features" would be influenced by special intrest groups. i'd also hate to see M$oft take over the freedom of the net.

    BTW, if the first guy is going to MIT, i'm santa.

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      hautedawg, 21 Dec 2005 @ 8:45am

      Re: No Subject Given

      If he's going to MIT, and you're Santa, can I be the Stanford Easter Bunny? I'm really dumb as dirt, and money couldn't get me into "any" school, but I did manage to granulate. First poster congrats! Just stay in school or drop the ego, it's one or the other...

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Harry Bools, 21 Dec 2005 @ 7:42am

    "fixing"?

    They've been fixing the Internet for years. One of the reasons the Internet exists is to act as a hotbed for testing out new technology. And over time, whatever technology really worked or found a use online, stuck. Thus the Internet has morphed and changed as we have needed it to. The only thing that I can see that would cause some upheaval would be when we outgrow TCP/IP and need something faster, as it was designed in the late 60's for slow, dirty networks. There are even several possible replacements being tested ON THE INTERNET. Even if they tried to build a bigger, better, faster Internet in parallel to the existing one (like I don't know, I2....already exists by the way), they would still have to slowly migrate over to it, piece by piece to avoid disrupting major veins of traffic and business. Am I alone here? Does no one see my point(s)?

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Jim Bob Joe, 21 Dec 2005 @ 10:20am

      Re:

      The same problem applies with Operating Systems we can't just jump over to a totally new operating system, everything has to be rebuilt. We would never be able to stop using one and start using another. We need to expand the exsisting structure, not build a whole new internet. Just my 2 cents.

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 21 Dec 2005 @ 7:51am

    No Subject Given

    As has been hinted, the only motivation for "rebuilding the internet" is money. Perhaps the RIAA, MPAA, and other such dinosaur organizations have a significant stake in dictating how internet traffic moves. However, I strongly suspect that ordinary multinational corporations have a much greater motivation. The internet as we know it was not designed for the rapacious needs of conscience-free giants. But now that they understand how it might be of use to them, they have both the will and the means to build a pseudo-internet to their liking.

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Harry Bools, 21 Dec 2005 @ 7:56am

      Re: No Subject Given

      I agree that they might build their own piece. And that's fine. Let them have it and use it to their own ends. But that wouldn't necessarily impact all the other parts of the Internet. The conscience-free giants may have money and will, but the Internet is a pretty big beast. I doubt they have the unity to even take a whack at the ankles of the Internet. (if it had ankles...but you know what I mean...goooooshhh)

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 21 Dec 2005 @ 8:10am

    If it aint broke...

    "... dont fix it"
    hasnt anyone ever heard this expression?

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Steve, 21 Dec 2005 @ 8:31am

    No Subject Given

    Saying the Internet is broken is like saying the Universe needs fixing. I agree we need to add some type of intelligence to the internet core that can sniff out bad guys doing bad things. But I think it will be a long time before a stable, unintrusive security platform can be introduced into the core.

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 21 Dec 2005 @ 8:43am

    No Subject Given

    How about "if it ain't broke don't fix it". Slowly upgrade the internet, peice by needed peice, and let academics carry this out to everyones benifit, not just those with money

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Bryan, 21 Dec 2005 @ 9:55am

    uhh

    I have a theory, when the first post has no revelence to the topic of the blurb, THEN IT SCREWS UP FURTHER POSTS.

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]


Tiny Microsoft Subsidiary Most Profitable Company In Ireland
More Class Action Lawsuits Against Sneaky Install Adware Firms
Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

Friday

19:39 Important Announcement: Techdirt Is Migrating To A New Platform (0)
More arrow

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.