Microsoft: Pay Us To QA Our Free Buggy Software
from the that's-some-scam dept
We've certainly heard of invites to "exclusive" beta tests like Gmail, Orkut or Wordpress.com showing up on eBay, but almost all of those were cases where individuals who had received them were then turning around and auctioning them off because there was a lot of demand to get into the community. Having a company auction them off themselves begins to get a bit tricky. Microsoft is now trying to convince people to buy the ability to beta test their latest instant messaging software. This raises a few questions. First: who are these people they're getting people to pay them to test out and give feedback on "free" software that they clearly believe isn't ready for primetime? It would appear that they're basically getting people to pay Microsoft to QA its free software. Of course, that's Microsoft's right, and if they can convince people to do it, more power to the folks at Microsoft. However, it might make some wonder what kind of people you've attracted to your "beta" test. Update: As someone points out in the comments, it appears that the article we linked to at PC World may have gotten the story wrong. It may not actually be Microsoft auctioning these off, though they are promoting that the invites are for sale.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Who can you chat with?
If so, I can't imagine anyone paying to beta test a new IM client that only lets them chat with other beta testers...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not really...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
Pay attention.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
Yes, we had already edited the story by the time of your post. However, the original article does say that it's Microsoft that's doing the auctioning, so you can understand how we thought that, um, Microsoft was doing the auctioning.
It looks like, however, the article was incorrect.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is the software industry...
No MMORPG I've ever played has ever had what I would call a flawless launch - DAOC had massive server outages and login server failures, not to mention wonderful exploits (like alt-tabbing to drop from the server if you were going to die). Shadowbane is still, to my knowledge, pre-beta software. At least they've got the lag looked after. City of Heroes had bigtime server crashes that could have been resolved if they'd been allowed another month of open beta. Blizzard completely underestimated their sales and sold more copies than servers could handle, resulting in frequently borked login servers and horrendous lag. City of Villains - it launched even more poorly than CoH. The servers stayed up but it was and still is bug city.
And that's just the MMO world. Applications don't fare much better. Look at Windows. Look at Linux! To this day I'm unable to install any distro because installing onto an IDE secondary drive while installing GRUB onto a SATA master isn't supported.
But that's just the way it is until we can produce some reliable method of AI software testing. I do QA professionally and it's overwhelming how many permutations you need to test either manually or through a designed test case.
Bugs are unacceptable but there's simply no way around 'em. I guess the smart thing to do is to convince end users that bugs are GOOD because then *THEY CAN REPORT THEM AND GET A THANK YOU!!!*. Humbug.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Get it right, hey!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]