Kevin Martin Shows He's Confused About Competition

from the try-that-one-again dept

We've already pointed out that the FCC's Kevin Marin seems to believe that a duopoly is competition, but he's now officially confirming that by stating: "In the long run, we've got to make sure that there are additional competitors as well. But I think that we're very fortunate that we've actually got two pipes into the homes that are competing today." That's funny, because the competition isn't necessarily just in having pipes reach the home, but in offering services over them. If anything, you could argue that there's inefficiency in having multiple pipes. The real competition should be in the connectivity offered over those pipes -- and that's exactly what Martin has worked hard to stamp out. At the same time, he also made this interesting statement: "we've seen dramatic decreases in prices, increases in speed and more ubiquitous deployment." The increases in speed and ubiquitous coverage (which might be questionable) were a natural progression, so it's hard to see how the FCC can take credit for that. However, the "dramatic decreases in price" are also questionable. While the telcos have received plenty of attention for decreased prices, those were almost entirely one off promotions with the prices already starting to go back up. Also, since there's no real competition, the telcos have been able to avoid offering naked DSL -- meaning that your "cheap" DSL line actually has to come with expensive telephone service you don't need, making the full price a lot higher than advertised. But, most importantly, it appears no one told the cable half of the duopoly about the dramatic decreases in price, as many of the big cable companies all announced price increases in the last few months. Even though those prices are officially for cable TV service, since (notice a trend?) most cable companies won't let you buy cable broadband without cable TV... you're stuck again. That's competition?
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Haggie, 21 Dec 2005 @ 4:15pm

    No Subject Given

    His statement sounds like something that an idiot politician with neither DSL nor broadband cable in his home would say.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Eric, 22 Dec 2005 @ 7:20am

      Re: No Subject Given

      I'm sure he has high speed internet in his home, he just makes way too much money to consider its cost.

      link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.