Court Says Message Board Mocking Is Protected Speech

from the go-ahead-and-mock-away dept

Nearly a year and a half ago, we wrote about a lawyer who was upset at being mocked on some Yahoo message boards -- and tried to organized a class action lawsuit against the company and some of the posters. He was upset at Yahoo for (1) failing to stop these mocking posts, which he believed went against the company's terms of service and (2) not providing accurate info about who the posters were. Apparently, he did get enough info to sue at least one user, Ron Long, who he believed was responsible for the mocking posts. Long's lawyer, Joe Ribakoff writes in with an update: "In August '04, you ran an article about a lawsuit filed against Yahoo by LA insurance lawyer Stephen Galton. The lawsuit complained that Yahoo was allowing people to mock Galton on a message board. Galton sued not only Yahoo. He also filed a defamation action against Ron Long, the person he believed had mocked him. The California Court of Appeals has now dismissed Galton's lawsuit against Long. On December 22, 2005, it issued an unpublished decision that found that the messages mocking Galton were 1st Amendment protected speech. The Court also ordered Galton to pay Long's attorney's bill. The bottom line is: Mocking Stephen Galton is protected 1st Amendment speech. Galton may sue you, but he will lose and he will pay your attorney's fees." It would be nice if this decision was published somewhere, because right now we only have the word of this lawyer who was involved in the lawsuit to go on. Update: Thanks to someone in the comments for linking to a PDF version of the court's ruling, which makes for interesting reading -- noting, basically, that no one with an ounce of common sense would assume that the posts (which are included in the file) were meant to be taken literally based on both the language used in them (which, while definitely "mocking" isn't libelous) and the nature of the forum itself.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Aidan Maconachy, 3 Jan 2006 @ 12:06am

    No Subject Given

    It amazes me that Galton went as far taking this to court.

    People are defamed all the time on the net. It's the nature of the beast. I thought lawyers had thicker skin - they certainly do when it comes to nailing their clients for hefty fees :)

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 3 Jan 2006 @ 1:27am

      If you dont like what you read, dont read it.

      If you dont like what you read, dont read it. or better yet, use the same tactics to prove what you're reading is wrong. let the people decide - and if they decide against you, the is probably a good reason behind that.

      How "self-centered" this one guy is... to believe that the WHOLE WORLD revolves around him (and that the WHOLE WORLD actually believes everything that is written on the internet is actually true.)

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Devang (profile), 3 Jan 2006 @ 2:08am

    PDF of case judgement

    here is the judgement. The good stuff starts on pg 23.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.