Who Would Believe That AOL May Have The Most Innovative Online Video Offering?
from the well,-look-at-that dept
Putting "innovative" and "AOL" in the same sentence may shock some people, but MIT's Tech Review makes a convincing case that with all these new broadcast online video offerings AOL is really the one to watch. While Google may be barking up the wrong tree by focusing on a system reliant on incompatible copy protection, AOL is focusing on the type of video that people have made clear they like: free. At the same time, they've been improving video search through acquisitions -- basically attacking Google on their home turf. That's a bit surprising since many expected Google and AOL to team up on video rather than compete (Time Warner so far has declined to take part in Google's video offering). Of course, AOL's offering isn't perfect. In the past we pointed out that it was a step in the right direction, but still too limited, since it's just streaming (no moving it to a portable device). How hard is it to recognize what most people want and deliver it to them? They don't want limits and they don't want to pay -- but that doesn't mean there isn't an opportunity. AOL is almost there by offering these shows up for free with commercials, but if they made it downloadable and portable they'd be much further ahead than the competition. People are already downloading shows using BitTorrent, so that's what these companies have to compete with. Locking things up and charging for them is offering a worse product. Of course, the response from Google (and others) may be that they don't care so much about traditional broadcast video, and the focus is on providing the platform for others to host and share video. However, so far, it doesn't seem like Google is pushing that aspect of their offering. Perhaps they should, instead of focusing so much attention on a tiny selection of expensive locked-down broadcast content.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Google video
Yesterday was the first day I watched Google TV - pretty soon it will add comcast to a list of companies and services that have or are becoming Googlekill.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
I don't think any of us will be happy until we have one stop shopping, and multiple payment options, ownership options, etc to fit the need we have, which may be different from our neighbor.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
F AOL
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why ya gotta be a hater?
Google is doing what they do - roll out products as they become available and continue to evolve the Google "brand". While January 06's offerings on GVideo may be sparse, June 06's GVideo may be an entirely different beast - especially if they can deliver HD content.
I think TD should take a step back and try to get the long view here, rather than beat on the "Google has stumbled" drum.
I certainly don't think you should adopt the other extreme of gushing breathlessly over every widget that says "Google," but don't be so quick to judge them "lame", either.
It's not like they're out suing people for infringment of obvious patents..
-j
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why ya gotta be a hater?
I think Google's video offering has a ton of potential and I wouldn't be surprised at all to see much of it realized eventually. My surprise was that they launched it in such a skimpy way. That's not standard practice for Google, despit what you say.
I'm also disappointed in their moves on copy protection, which I think were way too in-the-box thinking for a company like Google, and which only help to SHRINK the opportunity by adding another incompatible copy protection system.
As I said in the post, none of these systems are perfect, and hopefully they'll change over time. However, what's wrong with us nudging all of the players to go in the right direction?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why ya gotta be a hater?
I disagree - GMail was pretty skimpy when it came out (no Rich Text, no spellcheck, no virus checking...), and don't even get me started on how skimpy Froogle was/still is.
I think this rollout is absolutely par for Google; although I'd concede the CES sideshow gave the announcement a veneer of "OMFG!!11!!1 G00GLE R TEH R()X)()RZ!111!"
Personally, I would have liked to see HD samples at launch - that would have gone a long way to cementing my conviction in Google. In time, I'm sure...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why ya gotta be a hater?
I disagree - GMail was pretty skimpy when it came out (no Rich Text, no spellcheck, no virus checking...), and don't even get me started on how skimpy Froogle was/still is.
I think this rollout is absolutely par for Google; although I'd concede the CES sideshow gave the announcement a veneer of "OMFG!!11!!1 G00GLE R TEH R()X)()RZ!111!"
Personally, I would have liked to see HD samples at launch - that would have gone a long way to cementing my conviction in Google. In time, I'm sure...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
aol and torrents
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
youGottabelievemystory
YouGottaBelieveMe!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]