Record Labels? Collusion? You Can't Be Serious

from the who-you-gonna-call-trustbusters dept

It's no secret that some record labels advocated price-fixing for downloaded music, believing for some reason that they should be able to control the retail, as well as wholesale, price of the music they sell to Apple -- something that's attracted the attention of New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer. But perhaps he won't stop there, as executives from digital-music allege anticompetitive behavior by the labels in subscription-based music services as well. They say the labels engage in a "passive form of collusion" based around so-called most favored nation status contracts. These contracts basically say that a particular label's music will always command the best wholesale price. If they agree to supply music to a service at a particular price, then another label comes along and gets a better deal, the label with MFN status has to then get the better deal as well. The problem then comes about when all the major labels have these deals, as they do now, eliminating any sort of competition. Additionally, at least one label is trying to get the contracts it signs with subscription services to allow it to look at the deals its rivals have made with the company. These MFN deals do away with the need for any tacit collusion, ensuring it contractually instead. The labels may not be getting together in smoke-filled rooms to figure out what their prices will be, but that's because it sounds like they don't need to.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    ZOMG CENSORED, 12 Jan 2006 @ 1:35pm

    Payola all over again...

    Yogi Berra once said "It's like deja vu all over again" and I have to agree in this case. The further this whole Digital vs. Retail (for lack of a better comparison) fiasco goes, the more and more it's looking like our generation's version of payola.

    Price fixing, or "passive collusion" as it's now being called, and even further revenue related issues are burdening everyone and someone really needs to get in there and stir things up before it becomes and even more "tangled ball of christmas lights" (where one bulb wont work, but you have to untangle the whole thing to find out which one).

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.