The High Cost Of Synergistically Unlocking Shareholder Value

from the have-fun-with-it dept

Exactly a week ago, we wrote about the latest round of companies breaking apart to "unlock shareholder value" and noted that it often came very soon after the conglomerates were built on mergers that were talked up on "synergies" of having these companies together. We cynically pointed out that the real reason this happens is that Wall Street makes a lot of money on both ends. They get fees for merging companies, and for spinning off pieces. But how much? Business columnist Allan Sloan (who we doubt was inspired by our original piece, but we can hope) set out to find out just how much money is being paid to investment bankers for "advice." He looks at two companies: Tyco and Viacom -- both of which have bought a bunch of companies and recently spun off some companies as well, and figures that we're talking about hundreds of millions of dollars. Different organizations he talks to give different answers, but it's clearly an awful lot of money for the same bunch of advisors to basically tell these companies the exact opposite of what they told them a few months earlier.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Mousky, 17 Jan 2006 @ 12:52pm

    Cynical is correct

    It's too easy to blame "Wall Street". How about blaming people like Carl Icahn? Or is he part of "Wall Street"?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Howard, 17 Jan 2006 @ 1:29pm

    Typical

    When GM bought EDS, and spun them off (at a "loss") a few years later, they saved enough on reduced benefits for the workers that they transferred to the EDS division to pay for both transactions several times over, including the money that they paid Ross Perot to go away and shut up (neither of which he actually did). My guess is that a lot of "mergers" are done for hidden agendas.
    --
    Violins and accessories for sale

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Derek Kerton (profile), 17 Jan 2006 @ 5:30pm

      Re: Let us not forget

      Let's not forget that boards and top executives typically offer themselves "bonuses" and "incentives" for successfully completing a merger, or a divestiture. I never could figure out how selling a company merited a bonus, but apparently it's quite an amazing accomplishment.

      And, yes, Icahn is part of the Street.

      link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.