Google, Apple, Yahoo: Call The Telcos' Bluff
from the tell-'em-to-go-away dept
People keep submitting to us the story that's making the rounds about BellSouth saying it's "pursuing discussions" with internet companies to charge them extra for preferential treatment on their network. We didn't post it because it's not new. The same guy said the exact same thing a month and a half ago. We're not sure why his repetition is newsworthy on its own. Nowhere does it say that Google, Apple, Yahoo or any others are playing along with this -- which actually would be news. However, instead of just hoping that these companies recognize what a dangerous precedent this would set, it's time that people call them out and tell them to call the telcos' bluff publicly. Jeff Pulver is leading the charge with a direct appeal to Google's Eric Schmidt that he tell BellSouth (and the others, we presume) to take a hike. Even more directly, Pulver suggests that if BellSouth pesters them about it, simply stop allowing BellSouth customers to reach Google -- and see how long BellSouth keeps saying that Google needs to pay them. The reason the telcos have so many DSL customers is because of the valuable services that companies like Google, Apple, Yahoo and others provide. It's time the telcos realize that they're not the ones in the power seat here.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Power
It's just a careful balance where everyone obtains his benefits.
Providers may want to charge telcos because they bring them clients.
Telcos may want to charge providers for using their clients.
Clients may want free service because they cause the providers to pay the telcos.
Either way it's working fine as it is right now. If someone wants to break the balance, well they are just about enough OTHER isp's who won't.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Power
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Preferential Treatment
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
now for something completely different
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/5.03/eword.html?pg=3
http://www.everythingcomputers.com/1996%20 Columns/December/december_9_1996_column.htm
http://www.hotwired.com/talk/rants/ (down a couple rants)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bellsouth has the FCC on it's side, don't they?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bellsouth has the FCC on it's side, don't they
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Interestingly enough, this is not a new or short-t
Now, the Telcos are beset with a double-whammy: Their primary income source (mentioned above) is now a simple commodity, and flat-rate pricing is the competitive norm; The Internet has changed everything about how services and information are exchanged - especially when one considers that the simplistic measurability of the past is no longer present.
Telcos have been lining up quality-of-service equipment, throttling equipment, measurement equipment, and devices that separate different types of data - for a very long time. They have long felt that their business model will depend on being able to charge by type of service, or some other measurable aspect of what is crossing their wires.
How will they stay profitable? Only time will tell. There will be quite a bit of vacillation for a good while about stories like these. There is much at stake, but so much uncharted territory in the Telco's worlds right now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
So – go ahead – boot the data off.
Some one else will come along behind you and purchase you and your “pipes” for the lower than dirt price you set for them and make billions by turning the data back on.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Will GOOG care?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
back to Dial-up?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: back to Dial-up?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: back to Dial-up?
-you would be required to maintain a POTS line to support your dial-up - you could never switch to VOIP
-you could only use negligible bandwidth
-you would be using a slot on gear they paid off at least ten years ago. Pure profit for them.
-you would either have to buy a second phone line or use your cel to make calls while dialed-up. More telco profit.
Switching back to dial-up would be the worst thing you could do.
I am hoping WiMax will cause a revival of free-nets and not-for-profit internet access cooperatives. If the 500 families in my neighbourhood got together and bought a T3 or something and put a WiMax rig on a nearby tall building we could be ISP-free and probably still pay less.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
hhhmmm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Where there's a will (and a buck) there's a way
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
google went down on bellsouth dsl
[ link to this | view in chronology ]