Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

1. 

   Go Figure..., 30 Jan 2006 @ 4:26pm

   
   

   No Subject Given

   Thats sucks does'nt it?

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

2. 

   Gainer, 30 Jan 2006 @ 4:28pm

   
   

   Response: Antivirus Firm Pays Up To Avoid Being Ba

   Read the Patent #5,623,600 from April 1997. The concept of server-base virus software is not the core of the patent. It is the 822 process steps that are documented make the patent defensible. Trend has quite specific definitions for how the technology is built - the dispute must have some merit. I believe defending intellectual property is important to defend in the US as nearly 70% of our economy is service-based (we don't make capital goods like we used to) http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srch num.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5,623,600.WKU.&OS=PN/5,623,600&RS=PN/5,623,600

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

3. 

   Anonymous Coward, 30 Jan 2006 @ 4:40pm

   
   

   Re: Response: Antivirus Firm Pays Up To Avoid Bein

   U need to check out http://www.tinyurl.com

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

4. 

   Dam, 30 Jan 2006 @ 5:41pm

   
   

   Re: Response: Antivirus Firm Pays Up To Avoid Bein

   You need to look at the TLD: ".gov". When has anything done by the .gov ernment been tiny?

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

5. 

   Johan, 30 Jan 2006 @ 5:59pm

   
   

   Re: Response: Antivirus Firm Pays Up To Avoid Bein

   OR just make a hyperlink

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

6. 

   Anon, 30 Jan 2006 @ 7:46pm

   
   

   Re: Response: Antivirus Firm Pays Up To Avoid Bein

   Trend is Japanese, no?

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

7. 

   OK, 30 Jan 2006 @ 7:56pm

   
   

   No Subject Given

   Here is the above link done through tinyurl. http://tinyurl.com/b6czf

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

8. 

   Anonymous Coward, 30 Jan 2006 @ 8:12pm

   
   

   Re: Response: Antivirus Firm Pays Up To Avoid Bein

   Trend is German, yes.

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

9. 

   giafly, 31 Jan 2006 @ 5:28am

   
   

   Blackmail Sucks

   Re: I believe defending intellectual property is important to defend in the US as nearly 70% of our economy is service-based (we don't make capital goods like we used to)
   
   Strange use of the word "defend", to describe one company attacking another.
   And surely patent lawsuits make a bad situation worse, not better, by increasing the costs of manufacturing in the USA?

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

10. 

    Tom, 31 Jan 2006 @ 6:26am

    
    

    Re: Response: Antivirus Firm Pays Up To Avoid Bein

    Problem is about 90% of all software patents have some basis in prior art and should be summarily ruled invalid. Patent Office doesn't have the staff nor the skill to make this determination, which leads to a lot of undeserved patents being issued.
    

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

11. 

    foofdawg, 31 Jan 2006 @ 7:47am

    
    

    Re: Blackmail Sucks

    "And surely patent lawsuits make a bad situation worse, not better, by increasing the costs of manufacturing in the USA?"
    
    I don't think I'd be too happy if someone else was making money off of something I patented. I also don't see where the manufacturing cost of software that is already completed and sold on the retail market would rise because of their lawsuit.

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

12. 

    Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2006 @ 9:22am

    
    

    Software patents suck

    they are the biggest thing threatening inovation in software
    
    its a virtual mine field, you cant really write ANY new software that does anything without using patented obvious code. fortunately most of the time you arent sued on it. didnt i see a case a while back where microsoft got sued for some kind of browser plugin system? i mean microsoft makes the OS, makes the dll loading mechanism, makes the browser, makes the ability to load browser plugins for it ;) and someone else does it, and patents it.. its like .. someone builds a road, and you patent driving on it and sue them..
    

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

13. 

    Mike (profile), 31 Jan 2006 @ 11:02am

    
    

    Re: Blackmail Sucks

    I don't think I'd be too happy if someone else was making money off of something I patented.
    
    Which misses the point entirely. Hey, I wouldn't be too happy if someone opened up a competing pizza shop next to the pizza shop I run, but THAT'S COMPETITION. You have to compete in the marketplace -- not the patent office.
    
    As for patents increasing costs, they add greatly to the legal fees associated with being in the software business.

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

14. 

    Adam W, 31 Jan 2006 @ 4:42pm

    
    

    Re: Blackmail Sucks

    Not to mention extortion payments, which are also passed on to the customer

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

15. 

    Blanc0, 1 Feb 2006 @ 6:43am

    
    

    Re: Software patents suck

    someone builds a road, and you patent driving on it and sue them.. More accurately: Someone builds a road, you build and patent a car to drive on that road and they copy your car.

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

16. 

    Igor, 4 Dec 2009 @ 8:26am

    
    

    But don't you see, they are promoting innovation, they just want it all for themselves. I do have to agree that the fact that they somehow patented server based antivirus itself is pretty surprising. Patents can be notoriously hard to attain and are very specific. I am thinking that the server based antivirus is the general term for what they patented, but the process itself is quite specific. And, if this held up in court, there is probably something to it. Also, my bet is against a lump sum payment, and for a permanent percentage of sales....just a hunch, though.

    [ link to this | view in thread ]