Ignoring The Kids, Ignoring The Issue
from the fun-with-numbers dept
Can any survey on music downloading that only consults adults really be considered comprehensive? A new one says that 80 percent of people think downloading music without the copyright holder's permission is stealing, while a staggering 92 percent say they've never done it. Looking a little more closely, though, it's not that surprising, as only adults were surveyed. While the statistics will no doubt be jumped on by the RIAA, they conveniently ignore what the kids are doing, and what they think of the current musical environment. For what it's worth, the adults surveyed do give some insights into why music sales are sliding: more than half of people 18 and up say music is getting worse. Three-fourths say CDs are overpriced, while nearly the same amount say 99 cents for a song is a good price (though just 15 percent of people had actually bought music online). So the RIAA and record labels can blame illegal downloading all they want, but it seems pretty obvious that crappy, overpriced product is just as much to blame.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
1 point for Carlo
1) They're too expensive and I'll be damned if I line the recording asshats' coffers with MY money.
2) There's nothing worth buying.
With those two combined, I find I get by just fine by tuning into one of the many excellent SHOUTCast stations that are free and reliable and ad free. Hell, I even donate to my favourite stations.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 1 point for Carlo
I have listened to the albums of a few new artists at friends' houses, and rarely find more than one or two songs that I even want to hear a second time, let alone worth spending $10-$20 on a CD, something I know for a fact can be manufactured for less than $0.50 - jewel case and all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 1 point for Carlo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 1 point for Carlo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Its record labels to blame...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
...and we LIKED it!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Actually the survey does not favor them
Actually it goes against their arguments, that 92 out of 100 people never downloaded illegal music hardly backs up their arguments that illegal music is destroying their industry
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Actually the survey does not favor them
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Actually the survey does not favor them
Statistics can be presented to validate any view required. Never trust them.
It is a proven fact that three out of four peopl emake up 75% of this great nation of ours. ;-)
Christopher
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Actually the survey does not favor them
As for me, I am whole-heartedly against the RIAA. I feel that most of the mainstream music published in recent years has been crap. However, certain artists do warrant spending money on a CD. For example, Gorillaz (started by Tina Weymouth and Chris Franz of the Talking Heads) is a fairly mainstream band that produces good, progressive music. Despite this, CDs are still way too expensive, and even if I like the artist alot, I will not spend a penny more than $12 on their CD. Therefore, I buy vinyl. Better sound quality, half the price. Not to mention, most of the best musicians out there are not even on huge record labels. For example, The Mountain Goats have released albums on a variety of indie labels. By the same token, the only hip-hop really worth listening to is put out on underground and pseudo-underground labels such as Rhymsayers, Definitive Jux, and Anticon. The CDs out on these labels are generally priced much more reasonably, and the artists are generally the producers and company chairs as well, meaning that the money goes to the people making the music instead of the guy sitting behind the desk looking for more ways to suck absurd amounts of cash out of your pockets.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why I buy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
there are 3 kinds of lies
lies, damn lies, and statistics.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
remember the days of super groups, that would put out awesome album after awesome album?
those days are gone, bands these days are just trying to have that 1 hit record. this im sure is fueled by the labels trying to make a quick buck, and pressuring the producers to get 1 good hit to sell a cd. then, the producer can move on, with out concentrating much time on all 10 songs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]