Movie Piracy Doesn't Decrease Legitimate Purchasing?
from the set-pr-machine-to-spin dept
The head of the British Video Association says it's conducted research that found people who download movies watch just as many "legitimate films" as non-downloaders (via Boing Boing). So there's the industry's own evidence that downloading doesn't necessarily have a negative effect on their media buying habits. Well, if only they saw it that way -- the stat's only being used to justify putting anti-piracy trailers at the beginning of DVDs. The statement came as an answer to a series of questions the BBC put to people in the film industry, and their descriptions of copy-protection technology are pretty hilarious. MPAA head Dan Glickman says DRM provides consumers "guidelines for using and consuming content", and that without it, they "might eventually come to totally disregard copyright". Wow, who knew copy-protection was so helpful when all this time, it just appeared to be hampering fair use and keeping people from playing back content they'd bought in the manner they want and on the devices they want. The BVA head's answer is even more full of spin, calling DRM "a means of enabling consumers to access and use audiovisual content in a wider variety of ways that suit their tastes and habits". So copy-protection enables people to do things? Isn't that counter to its entire purpose?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Guidelines are not mandatory
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
I seriously doubt consumers see it that way, but if you are a music or movie exec trying to spin DRM as a positive thing (but still have piracy to blame for falling sales), it's about all you've got to fall back on.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No Subject Given
I couldn't agree with you more.
If they want our business so bad, why do they insist on making it so un-appealing!
If they were to enforce a few rules at the cinema, like no phones or babies, then I wouldn’t mind paying a little bit of a premium.
We could also go back to the days when watching a movie was a formal event. Maybe instead of spending millions on movies that aren’t worth the admission fee they could actually spend it on films that are good. I mean, who has actually watched those movies that won all those awards, and thought they deserve the awards?
There are lots of solutions to Hollywood’s problems, but instead of innovating and changing to suit their audience, they choose a scapegoat for the BBQ.
Alpha
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
I usually rent movies that I know are good and most of them are 5 years or older and only cost $1 to rent.
My opinion, if more jobs are offshored, more DVD's will be pirated, If big companies are stealing American Jobs, Americans will just steal big companies profits.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
!
No wonder why all these movies suck! I have been skipping over, or not paying attention to the federal warnings on the DVD covers and before the movie!
If I had been paying attention to those notices, I would have known how to better consume the movie, and therefore, enjoyed watching it even more.
Now I have to go back, rent all those movies again, read all the federal warnings, and then I can enjoy the "feature presentaiton" as it was intended.
Thank you techdirt for bringing this to my attention. I don't know what I would have done without you.
(thank goodness for NetFlix!)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
My Unscientific Survey
download movies are also the most prolific
consumers of movies. It's like an addiction,
they're always jonesing for more.
The last movie theater I attended was years
ago and only to escape the heat on a sweltering
summer night. I don't watch TV and own only
a dozen video tapes. I've downloaded one
movie which was a legal transaction (Night
Of The Blood Llama was too strange to pass
up)
The MPPA would be out on the street corners
washing automobile windshields for a quarter
if they had to make a living from my purchases.
It's the sort of people that download movies
buy most their crap and pay their salaries...
they just don't get it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: My Unscientific Survey
I rarely go to movie theaters, as I can't stand the atmosphere of the theaters.
As for downloading movies anymore, nah. Not with the nazi MPAA and RIAA out there.
Oh, BTW, I've never downloaded an MP3 illegally, occassionally I'll by a music CD, but radio is fine for me.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Then Napster goes down.
Suddenly the world is in a panic! Oh no, the music was illegal, I've got a cumulative fine of over half a million dollars sitting on my PC. Delete delete delete.
Then the MPAA steps in and attacks people anyway. "Destroying evidence" gets tacked onto the charges and people go to jail. 12-year-old girls get prosecuted.
But WAIT! It's BIG BUSINESS to the rescue with legal, pay-to-download songs that are cheap and of high-quality. HELP US I-TUNES. YOU'RE OUR ONLY HOPE.
Until we discover that ITunes is useless. Their proprietary mp4 format won't play in anything other than iPods and the iTunes browser itself.
Napster, MSN Music, and more respond with MP3 downloads. Except they're all DRM protected and the copyright information, if you actually want to read it, leaves you with the impression that if you try to listen to the music at all, you'll go to jail with Jack "Mad-Dog", the homocidal maniac who's charged with murder, child abuse, and using Kazaa. He's got probation on the first two charges.
We are in a Midas era of business. Namely, everything they touch turns to gold. The problem is that gold isn't actually good for anything besides looking pretty. It's heavy and useless. Maybe we can somehow keep corporations' grubby mitts off of stuff long enough to enjoy it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]