Publicity Through Wacky EULA
from the ditch-the-lawyer-speak dept
We've written in the past about some surprises people might find if they actually read the end user license agreements that come with software. Many of the surprises are "bad," such as Sony telling you that you must delete all your music should you ever go bankrupt or Qwest telling you they can charge you $5 per email should your computer get infected and spams anyone. However, others are more interesting, such as Microsoft offering $5 if their software screws up your computer (sort of the opposite of the Qwest deal) or (my favorite), PC Pitstop's promise to pay $1,000 to the first person who actually read their EULA (in part, to prove that no one reads EULAs). They paid it out, but it took four months and 3,000 downloads until anyone claimed the prize. Another organization has now been "outed" for having a somewhat amusing EULA, where it's clear no lawyers were used in creating the text. Digg points us to a screenshot of the EULA that states: "What's (sic) the hell, we know you are going to crack the screensaver anyway, so we aren't going to bitch about it." In the comments on Digg, someone notes that the same programmers have the following statement on their about page: "We don't bitch about piracy. If somebody cracks our games it means they were popular and good enough for hackers to spend their time on our games." The interesting part here, really, is that this sort of reasonable honesty is now going to get those programmers a lot more publicity, downloads and sales (of the products they do charge for).
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Well it is about time
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
hats off to originality
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: hats off to originality
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: hats off to originality
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: hats off to originality
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Meh...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
"HACKERS/CRACKERS: If you are looking at this, then you are viewing this in a decompiler.Please know that we are not a large company but a small company that depends on sales to feed our families. We spend a lot of time making our software great and affordable to commercial developersIf you really want a license to our software, please don't try and hack it. Just send us an email stating you don't want to pay for it because you can't afford it. We will give you a license if you really want it.If you enjoy stealing food away from children and the money away from hard working people, then you won't listen to this message anyway. Just remember, may God have mercy on your souls. Thank you, "
It's a fantastic technological acheivement that I can so easily review compiled code, as it offers incredible insight into how things work that we didn't previously have, but a pity that it forces developers to resort to these sort of pleas to stop piracy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]