Dot Com Kids Are Back... With A Twist
from the you-invested-in-who-now? dept
Matt Marshall over at the San Jose Mercury News does a nice job pointing out how VCs are back to funding startups with 20-somethings running the show -- something that was quite common during the bubble years, but which fell out of favor quickly. However, there's one big difference this time around that isn't mentioned in the article. During the original bubble years, for many of these companies the fact that the founders were inexperienced 20-somethings was often used as a major selling point for the company. There were tons of articles profiling young founders, where it seemed like what the companies actually did was secondary. This time around, it seems like more companies have at least figured out that it helps to focus more of the attention on the company and its products.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
I just hope that the best rise to the top despite the "experience factor" being used either for or against them. Experience is a vital trait. However, take a super sharp kid and throw him into the fire give him a little guidance and as he gets the experience you could end up with a much better investment than a seasoned exec that is nothing more than a seasoned exec.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
tagged.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
More Dot-Com Kids...
0. One thing that gets missed in these discussions is the strong mentoring ethic that used to exist in high-tech. Way back when, the first thing a new engineer got on his first day at HP was another engineer to show them the ropes. You know, teach me all the stuff you never learn in school, but you have to know to get things done. Getting a great mentor right out of school was one of the best things that ever happened to me. My mentor (along with my first manager) was smart enough to let me run when I could, and "guide" me when I needed it.
1. I guess its a legit business strategy to stuff a start-up with a bunch of code slaves right out of school, fuel them with free food and soda, pound the drum and crank out a "product", then flip the enterprise thru an IPO or M&A.
Does long term viability matter? If so wouldn't it make sense to help forge dot-com kids into substantial long term assets?
Naw! That's so 1970s.
2. I'm waiting to see start-up mgt that's smart enough to team up fresh-faced graduates with a some seasoned veterans led by smart honest realistic exec staff. I want to join a start-up that has that team.
Adding Eric Schmidt to the mix at Google was very smart. G-founders are no doubt scary smart. But, "smarts" and "wisdom" are two different things, acquired through very different paths.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]