Tone Misinterpreted In Half Of All Emails
from the we-still-really-need-sarcasm-tags dept
Misinterpretations of emails have been around forever; email flame wars erupt at the slightest provocation. A recent study reports that the tone in email is misinterpreted 50 percent of the time. Furthermore, 90 percent of people think they've correctly intepreted the tone of emails they receive, making for a dangerous gap in communication. The lack of tonal and non-verbal cues have made email and IM a haven for misinterpreted statements and flame wars. The study attributes much of the misunderstanding to egocentrism, since readers have a difficult time "detaching themselves from their own perspective." Supposed email etiquette expert Nancy Flynn needs to check her own egotism. Flynn's statement that "People write absolutely, incredibly stupid things in company e-mails" could easily be tinder for a nice little flame war. Oh wait, maybe she didn't mean it that way...
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is so incredibly true..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Smily face lol
Get the point :*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given (pass the blame)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Obvious Stated Obviously
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The Obvious Stated Obviously
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Email and IM tonality mishaps
She happens to be correct. I've worked for a few very large corporations as an IT contractor and I've seen some of the most amazingly inaccurate statements broadcast through company email. The many mistakes are: horrible grammer, mispelling (when client programs like Outlook, cc:mail, etc all have spell checkers), subject matter that is clearly inappropriate and just plain wrong. To make it worse than it already is, these inaccuracies could have been avoided by 5 minutes of research or just plain forethought.
Somehow, people have decided that proper conversational etiquette does not apply in the digital world. Perhaps this is because the participants of such conversations have never met. Perhaps these people have never learned proper conversational manner. Who knows? What I do know, however, is that people need to take a few minutes and consider what they are trying to say before they attempt to say it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Email and IM tonality mishaps
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Email and IM tonality mishaps
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Email and IM tonality mishaps
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Email and IM tonality mishaps
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
2 centz
* the exception of course is sarcasm which is almost always lost in text
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cues like emoticons and XML
All this is why cues like emoticons and XML are important in the textual medium. A ;-) at the end of the joke will go a long way for preventing a flame war. And XML tags are a very eXtensible way of conveying the meaning:
<sarcasm>Yeah, that's really impressive.</sarcasm>
<tongue location="cheek">It might help if you dipped your nose in the mustard.</tongue>
<pat person="self" organ="back">I did it in just three minutes!</pat>
<advocate client="Devil">They've succeeded in the market because their products are good.</advocate>
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Miscommunication the norm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
50% of sociologists misinterpret their own researc
It's no wonder they were right 50% of the time. It's a coin flip.
All the gobbledegook about egocentrism reveals more about the biases of the researcher than about the nature of e-mail.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
suspended from work for 5 daysfrom email misinterp
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
LOAN OFFER AT A LOW INTEREST RATE
I want to use this medium to advertise my business to you, in case you may be interested in getting or having what i offer, well my name is Mrs Theresa Kate am a well known and certified lender i give out loan to any one in-need of a loan expecially an urgent loan, at a low interest rate of 4% per year and the range of my loan is from $100usd to 100,000,000usd, pls if trully you are in-need of a loan pls contact me through this email address
reesekateloan_org@yahoo.com. reesekateloan_org@tuckercapitals.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
loan offer
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
email tone
[ link to this | view in chronology ]