Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

1. 

   Mike, 13 Feb 2006 @ 6:04pm

   
   

   No Subject Given

   Porno!

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

2. 

   msherwood1@gmail.com, 13 Feb 2006 @ 6:04pm

   
   

   This is so incredibly true..

   this is so incredibly true..i see it every day..

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

3. 

   Anonymous Coward, 13 Feb 2006 @ 6:31pm

   
   

   No Subject Given

   Its impossible to be sarcastic in an e-mail because most people take it the wrong way; I guess nothing will ever take the place of face-to-face conversation;

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

4. 

   jammer, 13 Feb 2006 @ 6:41pm

   
   

   Smily face lol

   If people could just learn the proper language of the web this could all be avoided. :) There is no excuse for the miscommunication if proper guidlines are followed. :( This is a lesson that we can learn well from our kids. LOL
   
   Get the point :*

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

5. 

   Paul, 13 Feb 2006 @ 6:46pm

   
   

   No Subject Given

   Blame the schools for not teaching people how to properly express themselves using the written word. I do.

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

6. 

   Anonymous Coward, 13 Feb 2006 @ 6:48pm

   
   

   No Subject Given

   sheesh.

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

7. 

   Pete, 13 Feb 2006 @ 7:18pm

   
   

   Re: No Subject Given (pass the blame)

   Yea, great idea... Blame someone else. It's just a fact that written word is not as easily communicated as spoken word. So many more elements go into a conversation besides the exact words exchanged.

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

8. 

   Stoned4Life (profile), 13 Feb 2006 @ 7:25pm

   
   

   The Obvious Stated Obviously

   I’m sure many chat room saavy users have figured this out on their own, at least through trial an error or personal experience, but if you have not yet come to terms with the fact that AIM’ing is not quite the same as face-to-face confrontation, you need a serious reality check. But hey, like everything else I say, take it with a grain of salt.

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

9. 

   Tom, 13 Feb 2006 @ 7:37pm

   
   

   Re: The Obvious Stated Obviously

   I've found that the tone of an email should never be interpereted. If its not clearly stated (ex: GET THIS TO ME NOW!!!) then tone should not be interpereted, since it can't effectively be communicated. Paul, I agree, the schools are to blame for lack of proper communication of the written word; making them realize that there is a problem is an issue that won't be addressed for a long time.

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

10. 

    Cliff, 13 Feb 2006 @ 7:42pm

    
    

    Email and IM tonality mishaps

    "Supposed email etiquette expert Nancy Flynn needs to check her own egotism. Flynn's statement that "People write absolutely, incredibly stupid things in company e-mails" "
    She happens to be correct. I've worked for a few very large corporations as an IT contractor and I've seen some of the most amazingly inaccurate statements broadcast through company email. The many mistakes are: horrible grammer, mispelling (when client programs like Outlook, cc:mail, etc all have spell checkers), subject matter that is clearly inappropriate and just plain wrong. To make it worse than it already is, these inaccuracies could have been avoided by 5 minutes of research or just plain forethought.
    Somehow, people have decided that proper conversational etiquette does not apply in the digital world. Perhaps this is because the participants of such conversations have never met. Perhaps these people have never learned proper conversational manner. Who knows? What I do know, however, is that people need to take a few minutes and consider what they are trying to say before they attempt to say it.

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

11. 

    Anonymous Coward, 13 Feb 2006 @ 8:48pm

    
    

    Re: Email and IM tonality mishaps

    The many mistakes are: horrible grammer, mispelling

    Yeah, I hate horrible grammar and misspelling too.
    

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

12. 

    Jay, 13 Feb 2006 @ 9:07pm

    
    

    Re: Email and IM tonality mishaps

    pfft - horrible grammer and mispelling - I hate making remarks about such things because you look like an idiot (as such in your case) when you screw up :P

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

13. 

    Cliff is a Moron, 13 Feb 2006 @ 11:13pm

    
    

    Re: Email and IM tonality mishaps

    Lol, Cliff. People living in glass houses ought not to throw rocks :-)

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

14. 

    some guy, 13 Feb 2006 @ 11:14pm

    
    

    2 centz

    i think that the problem is based on the age old practice of proofreading. In the digital world i find that most of the mistakes are due to the nature of speed and ease that the digital world provides. Emails are made easily and quickly, so who would want to take the time to go back and re-read what they just wrote. The truth is that most of the miscommunication is only mistakes* and if the writter bothered to proofread before sending out the email they would save confusion. Then proofreading actually saves time.
    * the exception of course is sarcasm which is almost always lost in text

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

15. 

    David Wilde, 13 Feb 2006 @ 11:54pm

    
    

    No Subject Given

    Hanlon's Razor.

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

16. 

    Michael Zaretski, 14 Feb 2006 @ 3:19am

    
    

    Cues like emoticons and XML

    All this is why cues like emoticons and XML are important in the textual medium. A ;-) at the end of the joke will go a long way for preventing a flame war. And XML tags are a very eXtensible way of conveying the meaning:

    <sarcasm>Yeah, that's really impressive.</sarcasm>

    <tongue location="cheek">It might help if you dipped your nose in the mustard.</tongue>

    <pat person="self" organ="back">I did it in just three minutes!</pat>

    <advocate client="Devil">They've succeeded in the market because their products are good.</advocate>

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

17. 

    Dan, 14 Feb 2006 @ 7:36am

    
    

    Miscommunication the norm

    This doesn't just apply to email. Most of the time people talk to each other, they are miscommunicating. Vitrually all the time they fail to detect that they are miscommunicating and continue to chatter away meaninglessly.

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

18. 

    Jekke, 14 Feb 2006 @ 9:09am

    
    

    50% of sociologists misinterpret their own researc

    Talk about junk science. Strangers passing prepared statements back and forth in which they have no real interest isn't even close to the way real human beings communicate via e-mail.
    
    It's no wonder they were right 50% of the time. It's a coin flip.
    
    All the gobbledegook about egocentrism reveals more about the biases of the researcher than about the nature of e-mail.

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

19. 

    caroline, 12 Sep 2006 @ 5:43am

    
    

    suspended from work for 5 daysfrom email misinterp

    An email was typed to 2 coworker and was also sent to unit supervisor which it offended. How can you offend someone in " threatening way" when that's her own interpritation of the email and not interprited that way to 2 other the mail was sent to? Is it a power trip? Seem that way to me. No verbal or written warnings were given an no previous negative comments towards this employee. But 5 day suspension was granted WHo makes that kind of harsh decision over I email incident?

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

20. 

    Mrs Theresa Kate, 26 Dec 2006 @ 1:53pm

    
    

    LOAN OFFER AT A LOW INTEREST RATE

    Compliments of the day to you all,
    
    I want to use this medium to advertise my business to you, in case you may be interested in getting or having what i offer, well my name is Mrs Theresa Kate am a well known and certified lender i give out loan to any one in-need of a loan expecially an urgent loan, at a low interest rate of 4% per year and the range of my loan is from $100usd to 100,000,000usd, pls if trully you are in-need of a loan pls contact me through this email address
    reesekateloan_org@yahoo.com. reesekateloan_org@tuckercapitals.com

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

21. 

    alonso, 29 Nov 2007 @ 5:30pm

    
    

    loan offer

    Hello Dear, Are you tired of Seeking Loans and Mortgages,have you Been Turned down constantly By your banks and Other Financial Institutions,We Offer $5000 min to $200,000.00max,you have to be 18yrs and older to apply,reply now via Emai:financing_loans@myway.com,We give out loans to all categories of people, firms, companies, schools, churches, industries etc. we give out loans at very cheap and moderate rates,We are trusted,reliable and dynamic.contact us now...Hurry Up and get this Unique Opportunity Everyone is talking about. please respond Via only Email: financing_loans@myway.com.The first 10 applicants,they get their loan at 5%.Hurry Now. Thanks

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

22. 

    possumgirl, 25 Feb 2013 @ 1:40am

    
    

    email tone

    I just had a stern talking to at work over the supposed tone of my email. It is really hard to know the other persons intended tone via email. My boss started reading it out to me with this sarcastic tone that just wasn't intended. I think its crazy. im glad to read this story and know its not just me! Thanks.

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

23. 

    Anonymous Coward, 12 Feb 2022 @ 12:26pm

    
    

    Re: Re: Email and IM tonality mishaps

    That could have been a brilliant use of satiric misspelling, emphasizing the fact that people misinterpret tone or humor.

    [ link to this | view in thread ]