Amazon Patents Product Bundles?

from the oh-come-on dept

theodp writes "Apparently dazzled by examples that showed how to buy one's mother a birthday present, the USPTO awarded Amazon.com a patent Tuesday for assisting a user of an item purchasing service in giving groups of related items to recipients." Again, we have to ask how can this possibly be patentable? Basically, it's a patent for link together a group of products so they can all be bought in a single bundle. It's a nice idea, but deserving of patent protection? If I run a gift shop on the corner, and decide to bundle up a bunch of little gifts into a gift basket, can I patent that idea so no other stores can do the same?
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 17 Feb 2006 @ 5:18pm

    No Subject Given

    I can't believe that my florist sold me flowers AND chocolates three days ago! That evil bastard! He better pay up or I'll rat him out to Jeff B. myself.

    Oh, wait. I've been buying flowers and chocolates there every year since Jeff was shitting in his Huggies. So, Jeff is the evil infringing bastard!

    Oh, wait. I use to deliver papers and shovel driveways and charge once price.

    Jeff - STFU!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      CompTrekkie, 17 Feb 2006 @ 7:54pm

      LOL

      ROTFLMAO

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 18 Feb 2006 @ 6:17am

      Re: No Subject Given

      OMG, time for Amazon.com to sue McDonalds. I was there the other day for a hamburger, they suggested FRIES! There were pictures of little bundles suggesting I guy them with BEVERAGES too!

      But it doesn't just stop there! There's a prepackaged meal that includes TOYS! I'm about to go there for breakfast, not only do are they suggesting I get breakfast food, but now gourmet espresso drinks and pastries :O

      They even include NAPKINS in the bags, FREE OF CHARGE. Someone must hear about this. Napkin supply stores, Toy stores, Coke, Starbucks, Heinze, and the French are all being exploited by McDonald's infringement on Amazon.com's patent. For shame!

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    NOCcer, 18 Feb 2006 @ 9:57am

    No Subject Given

    5 years to think about this and still screwed it up

    Inventors: Agarwal; Amit D. (Seattle, WA)
    Assignee: Amazon.com, Inc. (Seattle, WA)
    Appl. No.: 699244
    Filed: October 27, 2000

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    PatentGuy, 18 Feb 2006 @ 11:02am

    No Subject Given

    Hey, yall. Before you flip out, read the claims.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      discojohnson, 18 Feb 2006 @ 1:17pm

      Re: No Subject Given

      Hey, yall. Before you flip out, read the claims.

      why so i can flip out even more? 75 claims? and the last one saying how it'll tell me how many other people picked the bundle? how is this not thrown out by prior art? the patent is over electronic means, but i'm sure that since the beginning of ebusiness people have been creating bundled goods as a way of upselling merchandise (see also: THE REST OF THE BUSINESS WORLD). will this never ending line of bad patent approvals ever cease? i think that those approving patents should be held liable (firing, fines) for giant mistakes like this.

      i also like how many steps the process uses--"The subroutine then continues to step 1195 and returns"

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    mark, 18 Feb 2006 @ 2:21pm

    No Subject Given

    Sounds like the Patent Office is populated by recent law school graduates of something....the guy who granted Edison his patents is rolling over in his grave....."Shit! Why didn't I think of that!"

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      jdragon, 18 Feb 2006 @ 2:27pm

      Re: No Subject Given

      This is a ridiculous patent! Does this mean every online store can only checkout 1 item per order? WTF?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 18 Feb 2006 @ 4:46pm

    No Subject Given

    Yes, the patent is kind of stupid. But, clearly you all dont understand patent law. This patent will have little to no effect on anything. Were it leveraged against someone, it would be litigated into oblivion. And, were you as a vendor aware of the patent, it would be super easy to design around it.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Jobe, 21 Feb 2006 @ 1:55am

      Re: No Subject Given

      To litigate, you need money, to hire them pricey lawyers to defend you in a court of law.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Andrew Strasser, 18 Feb 2006 @ 10:50pm

    Not what they had in mind?

    Or maybe just more Bush politics.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Federico, 19 Feb 2006 @ 3:43am

      Why patent then?

      If its going to be so easy to get around it, then why is Amazon filing for the patent? they must be willing to pay for it only if they are going to get some benefits.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Patent dude, 19 Feb 2006 @ 10:40am

        Re: Why patent then?

        The value in most patents is not in being able to sue, it's about having an expansive IP portfolio to sell to investors. I agree that this patent would be destroyed by a company who was sued by Amazon.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    ShaolinTiger, 19 Feb 2006 @ 1:25pm

    Amazon

    Oversteps the line AGAIN..

    Asses need a bitch slap from RMS, Stallman SMASH

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.