Why There's Still Some Good News In Google's Perfect 10 Loss
from the balancing-out-the-details dept
Yesterday we wrote about a judge's injunction against Google -- which we thought was odd, given that Google didn't appear to actually be doing anything illegal. They were simply profiting off of others doing something illegal -- and therefore, the focus should have been on the others. Over at the EFF, Fred von Lohmann has gone through the decision in more details and pulled out a number of good points that were not covered by most of the press coverage. Included in the decision was the fact that thumbnails, by themselves, are not infringing -- and that Google is not responsible for "creating an audience." Both are reasonable findings, consistent with previous rulings. The court also knocked off the completely out of left field assertion that simply visiting a website that has infringing material makes the visitor an infringer. All that said, there's still an injunction coming down -- and the reasoning behind that seems problematic, especially given all of the points above. The fact that some of the pages with these photos also contain AdSense seems completely unrelated to the search aspect. Also, it seems unfair to blame the advertising network for the content on certain pages. That's like saying the ad firm that places a magazine ad should be liable for a defamation charge if an ad it places appears in a newspaper across from a defamatory article.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
adSense
That being said, could they have noticed, and not done anything against it if they were in fact making money from the website?
Those are a lot of ifs, but don't get me wrong. I think it's obvious that no matter what, something needs to be done against the site infringing the copyright.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: adSense
also taken from the adsense policy under material that isn't allowed.
Pornography, adult, or mature content
so it should have been disallowed in the first place.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
If it isn't legally wrong, it sure stretches some moral boundaries. It could even be considered a little evil...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
That's irrelevant. Google isn't doing the copyright violation. There's no laws against profiting as far as I know.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You miss the point
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google should remove them
If I were Google, I'd completely remove all trace of Perfect 10 from their search indexes, web, images, news, the works.
They can then watch them come crawling back later when they have run out of traffic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]