Firefox Undermines UK Anti-Piracy Laws With All That Giving Stuff Away
from the who's-the-expert dept
An employee from the Mozilla Foundation got a strange email (via Slashdot) from somebody in the UK government that enforces copyrights, saying she'd confiscated a bunch of CDs containing Firefox that companies were selling. The Mozilla employee responded, saying that was well within the software's license, and that the CDs should be returned. The woman responded in disbelief, adding "If Mozilla permit the sale of copied versions of its software, it makes it virtually impossible for us, from a practical point of view, to enforce UK anti-piracy legislation, as it is difficult for us to give general advice to businesses over what is/is not permitted." It's unclear exactly what role the Mozilla Foundation plays in enforcing the UK's anti-piracy laws, or exactly why they shouldn't be allowed to license their software however they want, just to make things easier for some civil servants. If nothing else, it merely indicates how deeply ingrained people's preconceived notions about software "piracy" are. And it's disappointing that a government officer whose job it is to enforce copyrights can't seem to get their head around the idea that there is another way to license software than how most entrenched developers and companies handle it.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Carlo, Carlo, Carlo
"...somebody in the UK government that..."
People who Things that
You wouldn't say, "somebody in the UK government what
What makes this so striking is that Mike does it correctly. I never check the contributor name when reading articles, but I always know it's a Carlo post when I read "someone that"
MjM, which is a grammar junky
:)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Strange
How can people enforce copyright law when they don't even know a basix term such as Open Source. The nerve of some people. BTW, this is my first comment on this site, since I started reading it in 2005.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Strange
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Strange
Firefox's license allows people to sell it. Mozilla wants as complete penetration as possible - if people won't take it when it's free then they won't stop them from buying it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Correction
For the record, they did not confiscate anything. Just pre-empting any posts about the government abusing it's power and what not. It became an issue over on Slashdot...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
www.debian.org
www.gentoo.org
www.ubuntulinux.org
they must be pirated!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mozilla - Copyright - Open Source
Seems like this is the same issue with Mozilla in the UK, they cannot understand a CD that�s free��
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Mozilla - Copyright - Open Source
I've run into similar problems. I maintain a collection of Free Software for windows (similar to TheOpenCD) and was selling it on a local auction site. The local auction site removed my auctions and threatened to ban me because, quote:
"You are not allowed to list CDs containing
Idiots.programs that you do not hold the copyright for.
These CDs contained a number of programs freely
available on the internet. CDs of this nature
are considered piracy and will be removed."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
Why must people like you come here and tell us to use 100% perfect grammatical replies with zero tolerance for spelling in our replies to the topic being discussed? Is it too much to ask that people like you just read our replies, understand them... or move on to the next comment if the one you're working on is too difficult to comprehend?
BTW, pls stay on-topic. ("By the way, please stay on the current topic of this discussion.")
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is it too much to ask?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
wow, image that
BTW, this is my first comment on this site, since I started reading it in 1492.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
One case that did make it to court, but was eventually dropped with no charges, was one market trader who had, allegedly, over �100,000 GBP (retail value) worth of software available for sale on the day that he was arrested. In court his solicitor asked for each and every CD/DVD to be catalogued and each and every piece of software to be verified as being "freeware" or copyright. As the Scottish legal system did not have the time, money or man power to carry out such a task, the case was dropped and no charges were brought against the trader.
When they sell a CD/DVD, it doesn't contain just one program, it can contain many titles on the one disk. Many of the disks are compilations of commercial software and freeware. Therefore, in this instance, I would guess that the person in this instance is trying to track all copyright holders of software contained on such a disk.
This may help a little in explaining why they are trying to trace the copyright holder.
(Warning: The above post has not been spell checked although in the main it should be gramatically correct).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nonsense
By the way, I don't consider the sale of those disks to be piracy. I do question the seller's reasons for making a profit off of someone else's "free" software.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]