Customers? We're Supposed To Talk To Them?
from the listening-to-who-now? dept
We've had numerous stories about how bad many companies are at returning customer support emails, but it seems that things don't get much better once you get on the phone. The NY Times is running a story about just how hard it is to reach people on the phone at many companies. Apparently, quite a few companies take their customer service strategies from satirical posters from Despair, Inc. This doesn't mean that automation is always a bad thing -- sometimes people don't need to talk to a human. However, when they do need to, it shouldn't be so hard to reach one. Still, as the article points out, perhaps an even better strategy is to improve the products enough that your customers don't need to call you so often.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
I've also worked Tech Support, and believe me, the average caller should not be calling. 80% of all calls should be to a computer school to learn how to use their own computers, and not to a technical support dept.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
customer non-service
After waiting and waiting on the phone I finally left a message. Evidently they never listened to the message because I never got a return call.
Their loss.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
it's hit and miss
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
Now I'm not advocating MCI. I'm sure they suck as much as Sprint. The point is that if a service doesn't work, cancel it right away and get a replacement service -- I know that doesn't work for monopolies like the cable company (unless you can get DirectTV), but it works in 90% of the situations.
Also, if a product is satisfactory, return it right away. Don't call tech support to debug the problem. I don't care how trivial the problem is, I don't get tech support the chance to fix it because my time is valuable. If it doesn't work as advertised upon delivery, it doesn't work. Give me my refund or I'll have my credit card company issue a charge back, which increases the credit card processing fees of the merchants and they don't like that.
The fact is that it is easier and faster to switch to a competing product or service than it is to deal with web or phone based support. The people running most companies believe that their existing customers are locked in and will not switch to a competitor because of the hassle. That is why they don't care about good customer/tech support.
The best option the customer has is to walk away. If enough customers do this, the companies will change. If not, at least you didn't waste any of your finite time on Earth dealing with those scumbags.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
Also some sound advice here, like trying to contact them via phone before doing business with them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
www.nophonetrees.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
broken link on techdirt.com article
[ link to this | view in chronology ]