Why Does Anyone Need Permission To Place Shift TV To A Mobile Device?
from the not-an-issue dept
A week and a half ago, we noted that all of these hyped up fee-based mobile TV efforts were pretty much doomed, thanks to the rise of place shifting technologies from companies like SlingMedia and Orb (and, most likely, eventually directly from cable and satellite providers themselves). We also mentioned at the end of that post that the mobile operators were likely to whine and complain about how their "unlimited" data plans were being abused and how they needed to block the system. What we didn't necessarily realize was just how quickly we'd be proven right. Forbes is pointing out that the big mobile operators are balking at the idea and may not let systems like Sling Media's work on their phones. It's a position rightly called out as backwards and short-sighted for operators going against what their subscribers clearly want. However, more to the point, it's not at all clear why Forbes implies that Sling Media even needs permission or partnerships with the mobile operators. All they need to do is create the app that works and make it downloadable. They have the app already. As long as the mobile operators actually sell "unlimited data plans," then it would seem that there's really nothing else that needs to be said. Users can just choose to use it. Of course, we all know those plans really aren't unlimited. However, the operators would really need to proactively step in and block things like the Slingbox -- and that's only likely to stir up a negative PR storm they probably don't want (not that it's always stopped them in the past).
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
no such thing as unlimited data
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
blocking sites
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Network Dimensions
The bigger problem is how wireless carriers launch their broadcast services with the price insensitive pioneer segment (which every new product needs) being in hog heaven with their Slingboxes instead of their broadcast service.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Network Dimensions
The biggest problem, the only real problem, is greedy carriers touting services they can not handle.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Network Dimensions
Exactly! That's what the prefix "un" is supposed to mean. E.g. "un-able" or "un-friendly" or "un-ethical.."
Unlimited means peak usage 24/7 all the time every time, and anything else is false advertising, and constitutes fraud.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Network Dimensions
technical limits are created by economic limits. so when you are limited by a technical barrier, it is caused by their refusal to spend infinite resources on increasing the technical barrier.
i do not--and you should not--expect them to increase their technical barriers infinitely to meet your infinite expectations of 'unlimited'.
it is totally alright for you to yack about their shortsightedness and sluggishness to accept new technologies and uses of their services yadda yadda but shut up already with the cries about unlimited. if i offer you my unlimited services as a manservant, sue me immediately. i will die someday and thus your services will be limited, a clear breach of contract.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Network Dimensions
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Network Dimensions
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Network Dimensions
Can't stand by your own statements by filling in an email address field? Your opinion is worthless, even you won't back it up.
The problem is in the wording. You cannot advertise a product of any kind as "unlimited" and claim to cap it later.
What if I gave you a coupon for "Unlimited Whoppers" from Burger King [tm] and you paid a hefty price for it, then later on I decided there weren't enough cows to go around and I couldn't fulfill the Unlimited Burgers coupon I sold you.
Who's right or wrong??
Duh... Duh-Duh. [typing noises]
Judge Wapner says the coupon seller made false claims. Judgement for the Plaintiff: Unlimited Whoppers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Network Dimensions
I'll bet you in the wording of the actual contract (not the body of the advertising, the stuff by teh asterix) it says that they can change the specifics at any time as far as capping maximums is concerned. These people have armies of laweyers for a reason.
You're talking about the marketing version of "unlimited", they're talking about the legal version of "unlimited".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Did you check the Fine Print?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Network Dimensions
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My mobile operator has already embraced place shif
http://sprint.orb.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
It depends on the TOS that already agreed to from the entity supplying you the television programming you want to place shift.
When you sign up with direct tv (or whomever) you sign a contract that you will view the programming at a specific address. If you place shift it you are demonstrably in breach of that contract.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
Or, put another way, 'view' is their word for 'consumed'. Consumed is definitely flexible in a high tech world, where users can insert additional layers of technology at their whim, and consume the products of a device that is itsself a consumer of the original content.
Or maybe 'view' means 'see'. While not the most useful definition in this situation, it is certainly the most obvious. At any rate I dont understand why it is any of their business where i 'see' their content, and plenty of reasons why they care where i 'consume' it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Network Dimensions
The fact of the matter is, these days, damn never every statement that is spoken or printed has a disclaimer or a Terms of Use statement applying to it. An example above was the "bumper-to-bumper" warranty on a car. Everybody knows that it doesn't REALLY mean bumper-to-bumper, it means that it covers most parts of the car that are likely not to need replacement. But the minute anything breaks it wasn't covered. In this case Unlimited means "Unlimited up until a specific amount of usage".
If you really dislike it that much, you can go switch to a different service that fits your needs better, but there will always be limitations on the written and spoken word, because of these disclaimers, from pretty much every single large corporation with a product to sell.
How come when we buy a cell phone we all DO understand that it won't work EVERYWHERE, even though we pay for the cell phone because we want to be able to use it WHERE we need it. But when we buy the data service to go for it, people get upset that it isn't exactly the way we want it. Both situations sound very similar to me.......but extremely different results.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
Almost as sad is that consumers let most companies get away with it and our government/courts are happy to look they other way if no one is complaining too loudly.
I was raised thinking that the United States had a very strict concept of "truth in advertising". It is disappointing to see that business value has been trambled by greed and laziness.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Unlimited Data plan hypocracy
Evidence can be found of their hypocracy in the terms and conditions of the contracts. I know Cingular's contains language such as "plans are not valid for machine to machine communications,... telemtry applications and video servers" (wording may be dated).
Most interesting is that they themselves advocate using these unlimited plans for business applications like remote monitoring as well as the basis of their claim to be experts in providing mobile application "solutions" such as "real-time" inventory capabilities etc.
They can't have their cake and eat it to, either they allow high bandidth apps or not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
Free Wi-Fi is everywhere, at least in my city.
Many of the local kids buy Pocket PCs and use them as cell phones via skype and Wi-Fi. If the cellular phone companies want to be short-sighted to the point of pushing more users away from cellular into the arms of Wi-Fi / Skype or Wi-Fi / Vonage, let them.
The consumer is going to demand bandwidth, and they are going to get it. If the cell phone company does not offer it, no skin off my back, I can get it elsewhere.
Granted, in the short run, wi-fi/skype only works when the end user is standing somewhere with wi-fi, so for the time being, I and others would keep our cell phones, but... once you get a boulder rolling, it is hard to stop it.
The cellular service providers should not be in a hurry to chase their customers to wi-fi. Yes, this saves their bandwidth, and saves them some money in the short run, but in the long run, they begin to push the boulder at a slow run, so that their customers get more and more comfortable with wi-fi. This is not what they should want. Ultimatly, as wi-fi spreads, it with bite them, because they won't be able to stop the boulder rolling, or their customers from going wi-fi/VO-IP.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tv Everywhere
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]