Diebold: You've Got to Accentuate The Negative
from the shoulda-throught-that-one-through dept
Judging by all the bad press and controversy surrounding Diebold's election services, you might think they'd want to play up that the company primarily makes ATM machines. In fact it seems just the opposite. The company recently promoted Thomas W. Swidarski former head of the elections division to be their new CEO, after the former's abrupt resignation. So why of all people would they promote him? Not only was he at the head of their most controversial division, but he's also considered to be inexperienced. The most optimistic answer is that he is very familiar with the problem they're having (little things, like breaking election law), but since the problems arose under him, why do they think he's the best one to solve them? This looks like a rushed decision, and one that will further tarnish the company's reputation.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Reputation?
Even their ATM division doesn't deal directly with consumers, who would drive most loss of business due to a bad reputation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Reputation?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Situation: Normal
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
"this looks like a rushed decision..."
Look admit it, you know nothing about the guy, his qualifications and expertise. Have his performance appraisals suddendly been 'leaked'? Well then shutty
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
morons
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
Do you have a relevant opinion or perspective on this which would make the discussion more interesting, or are you just whining about other people expressing ones that differ from yours?
You seem to entirely miss the point of this site.
As if a leaked appraisal would make it OK to be critical? How many links do you want about how faulty, unreliable, and unsecure these machines are? If he was in charge of that division, simple reason leads one to conclude that he's either corrupt and made sure they were hackable, or he's incompetent and couldn't make them work.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
the modern business model
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Maybe
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A portent of Diebold's future
Reconfigure name to "Die Bold!".
Memo to voters:
Up yours; WE count the votes, and it's none of your business, so buzz off.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]