Ma Bell Getting The Band Back Together
from the no-surprise-there dept
Anyone who didn't expect AT&T to buy BellSouth hasn't been paying attention. Back in 2004, we compared the two companies to a couple who wouldn't admit it was a couple. Also, as soon as the SBC, AT&T merger closed, we noted that the clock was ticking on the eventual AT&T/BellSouth merger. It took a bit longer than the 24 hours some predicted, but AT&T and BellSouth have come to a merger agreement -- suggesting the big publicity push that BellSouth put on at the time of the AT&T/SBC merger was really just a ploy to raise the price. However, given BellSouth's close relationship with AT&T (the SBC part), this was a natural move. There's some concern as to whether or not this makes it through regulatory review, but it would be surprising if it doesn't get approved in some format (perhaps with the forced sale of certain totally meaningless parts). Consumer groups are saying they'll oppose the deal, but it's unlikely that will matter. The request by one group that the combined company sell off Cingular (which is already jointly owned by the two companies) seems like a pointless suggestion that really doesn't impact the competitive issue at all. If these groups really are concerned about competitive issues, they'd focus on network neutrality issues -- as the combined company (both parts of which have advocated ditching net neutrality) would be in a position of power when it came to offering broadband services to large parts of the country where little real competition exists.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Bigger, yet smaller
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bigger, yet smaller
http://money.cnn.com/2006/03/06/news/companies/att_jobs.reut/index.htm?section=cnn_topstories
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I have a bad feeling about this
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I have a bad feeling about this
http://164.195.100.11/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm& r=1&f=G&l=50&s1='6539080'.WKU.&OS=PN/6539080&RS=PN/6539080
6,539,080 Method and system for providing quick directions
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I have a bad feeling about this
A shame that this will pass with minimal looks from the government.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Scary news
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Scary news
This acquisition really brings into focus the fact that the next big telecom battle will be between the telcos and cable. No one cares about voice anymore, its the delivery of content (IPTV) that is being fought. If you think any of the providers are going to allow video to trend to free like voice has, you are nuts.
How come no one has a problem with a mobile provider charging extra for bandwidth, yet if a telco does, its a major problem? Posts here in other threads talk about the lack of uptake of broadband in the US, or not being able to even get broadband, but then want to limit the potential of the provider of that broadband?
If I were a provider thinking of expanding my footprint, would I lay fiber at a cost of a billion dollars per million subscribers knowing that my customer will buy voice from someone else and video from others? How long would it take me to recover the cost of laying that fiber? Would I bother?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Only the begining
It will leave us with three communication companies, fully horizontally integrated. Short term, people will have two choices though I expect T and VZ will attack each others turf using VoIP and WIreless.
The death star looks like it's nearly operational.... and Mike I do agree that people should not be surprised. I wrote the same before I saw this post.
I think MVNO's may have a role to play as very low cost providers in this new environment... the Verizon/AT&T/Comcast brands will be about horizontal integration, other brands will be all about wireless only. Maybe that is where T-mobile fits.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]