Re-Outing Bad Photo Store... A Good Sign Or A Bad Sign?
from the questions-questions dept
Jeremiah writes "Thomas Hawk has a post up today discussing the return and re-listing of infamous photography retailer PriceRite Photo. It seems they are back in business as "Barclay's Photo" on both Yahoo! and PriceGrabber under the new moniker. So here's my question: Is this a failure of "the system" to keep bad actors out, or is it a success in the sense this company has been outed (again) by the web community? " If you remember, this was the company we discussed late last year, where we worried that the vigilante justice of the Digg death penalty might go too far. It's good to see the community outing bad actors -- but the risk of people going overboard mistakenly is something that people need to be aware of. In fact, the Thomas Hawk article doesn't provide much proof that this is really the same company at all. Update: In the comments, Thomas Hawk counters my point about the lack of proof, noting that it has been covered (in detail) previously. Also in the comments someone from CNET's shopping offering (which hasn't relisted the company) talks about how difficult it is to keep these guys out.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
yes, and they might even be held responsible if you can prove that they did so knowingly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That said, every shopping price comparison engine should know by now how to deal with these issues.
Which is why CNET still maintains, what I consider, to be the most vetted list of reliable merchants around.
--Dan (yes, I work at CNET, and yes, I manage our merchant program)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
PriceRitePhoto
PriceRitePhoto very publicly changed their name to Barclay's photo on eBay. In my article I have a link to my article when this happened as well as an article by MediaPost covering the name change. eBay has documented that PriceRitePhoto and Barclay's are in fact the same company. The web address used by eBay is in fact the exact same web address used by the company on PriceGrabber and Yahoo! Shopping.
Whether or not the company deserves the bad publicity or not is a different conversation entirely, but I think your statement that "the Thomas Hawk article doesn't provide much proof that this is really the same company at all," is off.
Click through the link in the article or better yet, here is a direct link to their ID history on eBay. http://contact.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ReturnUserIdHistory&requested=barclaysphoto If this evidence is "not much proof." I'm not sure what kind of proof you are actually looking for.
At this point though for me the story is less about PriceRitePhoto and more about Yahoo! Shopping and PriceGrabber. When Yahoo! Shopping and PriceGrabber let a retailer who registers their domain as "John Smith" no address out of Brooklyn (a suspect place for shady dealers) and can get relisted on these shopping comparison sites I think something is broken. It takes two seconds to do a "who is" search on a company's domain and it would appear that even this basic screening feature is not being done.
People deserve to be protected from these individuals and if you read comments placed on PriceGrabber since I wrote my original story you will see that they are back to their old tricks again.
While the vigilante justice conversation is an important one, if you read the comments at Digg it is interesting to see that with Digg's new comment moderation feature that in fact most of these vigilante comments are being modded down at the same time while attention is being given to the story.
Of course I've yet to have heard from either Yahoo! Shopping or PriceGrabber on the matter at hand and don't suspect that I will. They should be held accountable though.
If the above eBay "proof" is not enough for you, what kind of "proof" is it that you think needs to exist before reporting on something like this responsibly?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good and bad
But kudos to Thomas H. for ousting them again. The folks at PriceRite Photo might as well pack it up and open a convenience store.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Death Penalty
Visit me at angel feathers tickle me
[ link to this | view in chronology ]