That Didn't Take Long: Classified Search Market Gets Even More Crowded
from the but-why? dept
It was just a few weeks ago that the near simultaneous launch of two different "blog classified search engines" seemed quite confusing, because no one could explain the real pain point these offerings were solving. Of course, as with any buzz-filled startup space, if someone has the idea, then 20 other entrepreneurs probably have it also, and they all seem to launch at once. So, Edgeio and BlogBuy now get to take a look at a startup called Vast, that appears to be aiming at the same market, but perhaps with grander ambitions. The difference here is that Vast is more of a pure vertical search engine that doesn't require people to use any special "tags" or anything in the info they post. Basically, it sounds like a comparison shopping engine that looks at more sources -- similar, in other ways to classified search engine Oodle. Of course, Oodle discovered that life got tricky when the major source of their classifieds info, Craigslist, shut off their access. Vast could easily face the same problem. The company is trying to be a bit different by being more of a platform, on top of which others can build applications. That's a cool strategy, but it really requires a lot of work to get others to bet on your setup as a real platform. Separately, it's worth noting that Vast was founded by one of the Epinions wonder-kids who later sued their VCs. At the time, there were stories suggesting that Naval Ravikant had been drummed out of the VC firm he worked for (though, we've heard disputed versions of this story). However, when that happened, many were saying that he'd never be able to raise VC money again. Apparently, not all VCs ascribe to that view, as Vast has raised cash. Past sins can be forgotten when there's buzz on the table.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Vast
1. Unlike Oodle and other services, Vast actually links back to the source - no scraping here. So there is an incentive for the content publishers to have Vast pick up and distribute their content.
2. Vast is unlike these other services because instead of a human-edited directory of sources, it crawls the whole web and extracts information out of the long tail (one point Naval told me which I didn't post to Techcrunch was that over 50% of their listings are from the long tail of the web). So this means that they are not reliant on a handful sites for their content
3. Vast is not trying to become a destination, its job is to find all these listing from all over the web, regosnise the content and categorise it, then syndicate it to other sites. So oodle would be using Vast as a source and building the comparison value-add on top of that.
The more time I spent looking into Vast, the more it made sense to me. This isn't a direct Edgeio or Oodle competitor - they can both take the Vast content then build their value on top of it or along side it. The conclusion of my post on Techcrunch was that Vast is a winner
[ link to this | view in thread ]
> 1. Unlike Oodle and other services, Vast actually links back to
> the source - no scraping here. So there is an incentive for
> the content publishers to have Vast pick up and distribute
> their content.
Oodle points directly to listings on other sites (and don't frame it when we link off to it). That's why we've been so well received by classified publishers (with the notable exception Craiglsist).
> 2. Vast is unlike these other services because instead of a
> human-edited directory of sources, it crawls the whole web
> and extracts information out of the long tail (one point Naval
> told me which I didn't post to Techcrunch was that over 50%
> of their listings are from the long tail of the web). So this
> means that they are not reliant on a handful sites for their
> content
For what it's worth Oodle takes a hybrid approach to our crawling strategy...
> 3. Vast is not trying to become a destination, its job is to find
> all these listing from all over the web, regosnise the content > and categorise it, then syndicate it to other sites. So oodle would
> be using Vast as a source and building the comparison
> value-add on top of that.
We are trying to be a destination as a search engine. But we also offer up an API to partners to integrate our listings on to their sites. Check out houston.backpage.com for an example.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
My two cents..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Agree with Keith, Nik's points are useless
And Nik, Vast is definitely competitive to Edgeio as well as Oodle, but not Blogbuy I would say as Blogbuy is more like Andale in the auction space. If you think Edgeio or Oodle can add value on top of Vast's listing, lets see what your tangible thoughts are about those points. And I would really like to understand what is the long tail of classifieds. Please elaborate.
Additionally, I would agree with Oodle's model of hybrid crawling strategy because classified are posted and used largely from trusted sources only and thats not about to change for a long time. Also crawling a few billion pages sounds ridiculous because a major percentage of that is hardly relevant to classifieds. Aren't you wasting resources with this? Isn't edgeio wasting resources to crawl 25m blogs and find a few thousand listings - many of which look like someone has taken a feed and posted it. And the spam is yet to begin.
Please research and be sure of your thoughts before saying "Just to clear up some points you raised" to techdirt. This is not the techcrunch audience you are interacting with :)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"Aren't you wasting resources with this?"
I am sure they will take your advice onboard.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Does the long tail really matter?
Who are these people who can't use eBay that they end up just posting stuff to their own blogs or whatever?
I guess I thought the long tail issue was already covered by existing solutions, and don't see how these new ones add very much.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Needs Assessment
Anyway - an interesting space to be in - good luck to Vast!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The long tail does matter.
If a classified is posted on the long tail then both the consumer and the vendor should be thankful for the likes of oodle and vast. Their service is as helpful in classifieds as Google is in normal search.
The ability for the global audience to find your postings (in this case, classifieds) should not be delegated to a few Brand names such as Ebay who wish to extract monies from the vendor or the consumer. These models would suggest that everybody with a web page would pay Google for including them in it's index.
Do website publishers despise the fact that Google makes healthy profits while driving traffic to their web pages?
Sentiments such as "Having one beast of Google is okay" and "the average consumer hasn't been hurting for lack of classifieds volume" make me feel that these posters would have stifled the creation of search engines back in mid nineties.... the average user wasn't hurting for lack of content then, finding it was the issue.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
re
[ link to this | view in thread ]