Big Words Make You Look Dumb?
from the Consequences-of-Erudite-Vernacular-Utilized-Irrespective-of-Necessity dept
When I was in junior high school, I had a teacher who tried to encourage students to expand their vocabulary. What she did was encourage students to try out "new words" in any papers they wrote for the class. However, because students aren't always comfortable with those words, we were told to write (new word) after the new word -- parenthetically pointing out that we knew that word might be awkward or flat out wrong. Ever since then, however, I tend to notice when writers use a "big" word where a small one would do and mentally add the (new word) marking to it. According to a new study, I may not be the only one. People notice when writers use large words where small ones will do -- and it doesn't make them think very highly of the writer. In fact, all those attempts to look smart tend to backfire and make people think you're even dumber. It's probably a case where the general awkwardness of the larger words make people feel that the writer is trying too hard. Of course, Clive Thompson (who we link to for this story) has another explanation. He feels that the test, which was done by simply swapping out actual simple words with thesaurus-picked complex ones, modified the original meaning just enough that it didn't feel right -- making people think the writer was less intelligent when, perhaps, a natural writer could use larger words effectively in writing the entire sentence. Perhaps it really depends on the context. In certain types of writing, short words just make more sense than others.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
For example, I used the word "Antithesis" the other day in the correct context and boy did my coworkers give me all kinds of crap for it.
I personally enjoy when writers use these words as I can add some new flavor to my vocabulary on occasion.
Of course stringing together a paragraph with a bunch of thesaurus picked words will sound dumb, but these (new words) expand vocabularies and make reading more enjoyable.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
A lot of the time, in writing, especially in the collegiate level, people tend to use overly complicated words where a perfectly simple one would have sufficed. Personally, I also use these words but only when the definition catches exactly what I want to express. However, simplicity is always better than complication.
The weird thing is... some people may thing you're tryign to be smart. Even though JPerks may have used antithesis correctly, people might think that JPerks was tryign to be smart and coming off as a pretentious prick.
It's a pretty fine line here... it takes practice to employ decent language to writing or speech. Usually people are more lenient with language over conversation though.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Yeah, I know the feeling...
But there is a difference between actually being smart and just trying to look the part.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
why use a thesaurus?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: why use a thesaurus?
xenocide – the slaying of an extraterrestrial person by any other legal person-google
[ link to this | view in thread ]
How about "plethora"?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Context
Ebonics spoken at a physicians conference makes the speaker sound just as ignorant as the Queens English at a bar in rural Alabama.
Though, we don't need an ill performed study to tell us as much....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: How about "plethora"?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I think the key to "appearing" intelligent in your writing is to tailor it to your audience. If you're speaking to a group of young teenagers it's probably best to leave out words longer than eight letters. On the other hand, if you're speaking to a group of Ivy-League professors I'm sure the word antithesis could fit nicely.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Firefox vocabulary solution
1) Type Ctrl - T [open a spare tab]
2) Type "dict " [where is replaced by the new word
3) Hit
Voila! The dictionary.reference.com page for the word is displayed.
Congratulations! Your vocabulary is enriched!
(Now if only there was a solution for the grammar!!!)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Firefox vocabulary solution - psuedo tags fixed
Voila! The dictionary.reference.com page for the word is displayed.
Congratulations! Your vocabulary is enriched!
(Now if only there was a solution for the grammar!!!)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
words are powerful and specificity is a good thing
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: How about "plethora"?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I work with a guy that refuses to use common terms for everything, he'd rather make a sentence as complex as possible. instead of saying "could oyu burn this to a cd for me" he says "could you burn these onto a digitial multimedia form for me?" and sounds like a complete idiot.
I also had a friend once that, when in a debate about one thing or another, would try to win merely by using big words and confusing her opponent.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Looking dumber
I must admit, however, that I've never found suitable context for "antidisestablishmentarianism". Perhaps some big words should be restricted to spelling bees and trivia games.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I must beg to differ, however, when it comes to using "bigger" words overall. I don't care whether someone thinks I'm being presumptuous or not. If I feel like saying "fisticuffs" instead of "fight," then I'm saying "fisticuffs." If people have not clairvoyance enough to determine that I'm being jocular, then I want nothing to do with them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Using big words
Yet, I wonder...is your writing really effective writing if you are constantly making your reader go to the dictionary to look up words?
I say know your targeted audience well enough to know when to use big words and when not to.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"antidisestablishmentarianism"
the most common error is adding an extra 's' on the 'dis'.
I also believe that a period belongs outside of a quoted word or sentence, unless it is part of the quotation itself.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
re: Firefox vocabulary solution
Perhaps you meant to say, "...if only there WERE a solution for the grammar..."
If you're gonna make a comment on a subject like grammar, I would hope that you'd take the time to ensure your own grammar's correctness.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
antithesis is just as easy. thesis...anti...come on!
here's a challenge: try to pronounce thesaurus. I bet you'll get it wrong ;-)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Did he not prove his own point?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Any writer worth their salt writes for the audience, and doesn't use big words just for their own sake. There's something to be said for readability and flow.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
re: Zeroth
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Yes - when someone goes out of the way to use 'big words' it can sound corny - especially when they aren't exactly correct on the definition.
As long as they are used in the proper place and in the proper context, I think they can significantly add to the phraseology of the composition.
lol
*hint* go to www.webster.com and just look them up - try to remember them and you'll actually know what the 'big words' mean...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Spell Check
I think it is very funny that there are so many posts on using "big words" and so many small words are not spelled correctly.
"Inconceivable!"
"Are you sure you are using that word correctly?"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I meant to say -
for the love of "[insert deity here]".
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No. Get over it. I'm sick of hearing people bitch about this. Its been going for as long as the internet has been wired into the homes of AOL subscribers. The best you can do is STOP BITCHING.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Communication
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
big words
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Just look at Penny Arcade
First, let me say I love Penny Arcade's work.
Now... anyone here who reads the news posts on PA would have notice awhile ago that it seemed Tycho got a word-a-day calendar... and used every single one of those bastards. He uses far, far too many "big words" and comes off looking like a tool.
I love linguistics... hell, I consider myself to be a cunning linguist (hehehe), but I don't want to have to have a damned thesaurus just to read a news post; especially when it's geared for younger audiences.
I know PA has an older fan-base too (like me), but its way over the top with the big words. And I'm not advocating the dumbing-down of communications. But one extreme is as bad as the other.
Tycho, you look like an idiot. Sorry man.
Oh, SKippyboy, the quote is
"Inconceivable!"
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
Don't want to sound like a hardass or something, but I love that movie. ;)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"Big" words
[ link to this | view in thread ]
vocabulary
Or there, their and they're.
Lose and loose....
Hear and here....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: vocabulary
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: "antidisestablishmentarianism"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
that is so funny
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Dittos
As one of my teachers put it, "Why use a $3 word when a 50 cent one would do?"
Jessie Jackson is a great example of one who uses words that larger than needed. If any of you remember "In Living Color" when they spoofed his speech in trying to explain a statement, "Let me proctolagize myself."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Spelling Nazi
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Thesaurus
"What's another word for thesaurus?"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Looking dumber
"I thoroughly enjoyed the book 'The Catcher in the Rye' if for nothing insomuch its floccinaucinihilipilification of the ideology of antidisestablishmentarianism"
It was the last sentence in an essay my best friend in high school wrote. The teacher gave him an 'A' because she didn't understand the closing sentence...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Spell Check
"I do not think that means what you think it means."
"Plethora" is funny to me because El Juapo used it in "The Three Amigos." I used it in a high school critique paper, and my english teacher said it really shouldn't be used because it's "trite." Apparently, he had never heard El Juapo say it, but it still tickled me.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Well we are tired of spending our hard earned cash in tax dollars to send kids to school so that they can speak ebonics, not learn to spell simple common everday words, and generally fuck up the english language. It takes 30 seconds to glance over a short post to verify that "the" is not spelled "teh" and "trying" is not spelled "tryign". Come on! These are EASY WORDS. Even Microsoft spell check doesn't miss them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: vocabulary
Sing it with me.... 'OH, if it's going to be possesive it's just "ITS", but if it's going to be a contraction then it's "IT apostrophe S" Scallawag.'
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Big Words Are Fun!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Just look at Penny Arcade
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Big Words Are Fun!
Feel should have been look in that sentence, oops.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Double-plus-good
Works of literature that use complex language should be reformatted in the new "more intelligent" reduced-language -style.
The use of a large vocabulary will be evidence of mental retardation.
In an effort to fix the old, retarded, larger vocabulary system....all previous works of literature, history, and such will be rewritten in this simplistic style, deleting useless details.
Big Brother says thanks to all the communication students who don't take a day out of their lives to read 1984.
People should have more means to express, digest, and communicate other than the conversational/magazine article/internet blog length of expression/thought.
I know, I used some big words.
"Suck on it." Just seemed to lack detail.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Where do we go from here?
I believe that everyone should try to improve their understanding of their language by experimenting with words that aren't commonly used... in the proper context of course. Please, for the benefit of the English language, read the dictionary, learn some new words, and try to use these newfound words correctly! Do you really want to sound as dumb as everybody else? Where has individuality gone?
Maybe instead of constructing phrases we should shorten our thoughts into a series of numbers that would represent predetermined speech. Why the hell not? It'll be just like ordering a #4 at McDonalds!!! That's an interesting thought, how many of you have already been programmed to know exactly what a McDonalds #4 is? Or perhaps we should just watch commercials on the telly and pick up on catch phrases; at least everybody would know exactly what everybody else is talking about. Remember that whole "wazzzzzup" thing? The corporate programming has already started. Please, PLEASE for the sake of your unborn children... read a friggin' book, learn a new word, and teach the less fortunate.
I hate to bring up George Orwell, but this sounds a lot like "newspeak" to me. And to slightly divert from the subject at hand, I'd also like to bring up how the use of technology has caused penmanship to entropy over the years. Now, seeing how popular instant messages, text messages, and social networking sites have become we don't even need to open our mouths or leave our homes to meet and communicate with people! Call me old fashioned, but I like to look someone in the eye when I communicate.
You know what, I have to stop... I'm becoming vexed, oops I mean incensed, you know daft... what I'm trying to say is that I'm pissed!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Big Words = Pompous Ass
I don't know a user of uncommon words who is not a pompous ass. These self-important jerks know full well they are causing confusion. And how is that impressive? Most importantly, how is it effective?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Me like'm small
Wait did I just deviate from the subject matter. I’m apologetic for my deficiency in understanding.
Wow that does sound dumb.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Me like'm small
[ link to this | view in thread ]
If I were to ostentatious RANDOMLY place an uncommon word, as I just have, it makes me look stupid.
When I am talking to an educated group of individuals, saying "That house sure does have some ostentatious woodcarvings in it." sounds about right.
Sure I could have said "elaborate" or "intricate", but if I am sure my audience knows what I am saying then how do I sound like a "Pompous Ass"?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Big Words = Pompous Ass
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The Spell Checking Daemon
No, the best thing we can do is not give up the fight. I'm not going to just roll over and accept the retardation of our society just because someone is tired of hearing people fight against it.
Sorry man, not going to happen.
Especially since the retardation is coming from laziness. I know most forums don't have a spell-checker built in. But guess what... word processors do. And the magic power of Copy & Paste means that I don't have to type something twice just to have it in a word processor and in a forum. Either type it in the WP first, spell check, then paste to forum; or, if you're feeling adventurous, type it here, copy it to the word processor, spell check it, then paste it here again.
Stop being lazy.
--This message brought to you by the magic of F7 and [CTRL+C] plus [CTRL+V]--
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Double-plus-good
Thanks for this. It's the only comment on the whole page so far that made me laugh out loud!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Laughing out loud
Gave me a great laugh prior to heading home from work.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Nauseous is an adjective,
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Double-plus-good
Orwellian (good name, by the way), what most of us are trying to illustrate is that putting unnecessary words into a sentence, for the sole purpose of 'sounding smarter' or 'sounding more sophisticated', is a bad thing. It is counterproductive and confusing (intentionally so, sometimes).
I am not advocating the dumbing-down or retardation of our society by making all media use smaller words. I am advocating the proper use of larger words. Using a larger word to make a more colorful point is great. Using larger words for circumlocution is bad.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Webster's
"nauseous...
1 : causing nausea or disgust : NAUSEATING
2 : affected with nausea or disgust
- nau·seous·ly adverb
- nau·seous·ness noun
usage Those who insist that nauseous can properly be used only in sense 1 and that in sense 2 it is an error for nauseated are mistaken. Current evidence shows these facts: nauseous is most frequently used to mean physically affected with nausea, usually after a linking verb such as feel or become; figurative use is quite a bit less frequent. Use of nauseous in sense 1 is much more often figurative than literal, and this use appears to be losing ground to nauseating. Nauseated is used more widely than nauseous in sense 2."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Where do we go from here?
Entropy is a noun (see here). I believe the word you were intending is atrophy.
I don't like being an anal-retentive correction-monger, but that was a prime example of incorrectly using a less-than-common word in an 'everyday conversation'.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: vocabulary
Last Christmas I sawa a sign that read: Marry Christmas!
At the beach a place where you could ask someone to marry you read: Will you merry me?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:Imprper use of "nauseous"
"nauseous (inducing nausea) for nauseated (experiencing nausea) is becoming so common that to call it an error is to exaggerate. Even so, careful writers follow the traditional distinction in formal writing: what is nauseus makes one feel nauseated."
This is exactly what this conversation is about, the proper use of words. If we are going to use more complex words, then we ought to take the time to figure out what they mean and use them in the proper content.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: vocabulary
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Where do we go from here?
I heart you. Will you merry me?
Oh wait, you already have! Delightful raillery!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Some people may feel stigmatised by your choice of words, since you're making them feel inferior, therefore making you sound "better than them".
There is, of course, another possibility, you could be cramming in useless words hoping to sound smarter in which case, you sound like a moron. The message is, use your brain and make sure the message reaches the receiver. If you're talking to some academics, use a different style than if you're talking to professionals.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Write to your audience...
That is, if you're writing for book-learned, "smart people", then high-falutin' words are the bomb. Otherwise, you're just dorkin'.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Being a teenager is no excuse for not knowing what "naysayer" or "antithesis" means...take a break from the video games and read a book once in a while.
When I was your age, I would have surelly been mocked for not knowing such simple vocabulary. What exactly are we teaching kids in school these days, anyway?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
Nauseated means you feel sick.
Nauseating is essentially a synonym for nauseous.
Read the USAGE NOTE at the bottom of this page:
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=nauseous
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
understand and I'm too lazy to look it up.
So /you/ must be dumb!
Lemme axe you sump'n... when did knowing
stuff qualify a person as dumb?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Looking dumber
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Double-plus-good
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Spontenaity
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Big Words - phewy on them
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: vocabulary
That sounds dirty.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Who needs it?
BTW, one of my favorite bumper stickers is, "Eschew Obfuscation".
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Write to your audience...
That is, if you're writing for book-learned, "smart people", then high-falutin' words are the bomb. Otherwise, you're just dorkin'.
w00t!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"uh-uh" (translation: want that)
"rowl-l" (trans: That is a very pretty lady)
"AII-OOH-GAA!" (trans: That is one hot momma!)
"Ahhhhhh!" (trans: The hot momma just did permanent damage to me.")
It works for babies.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: The Spell Checking Daemon
The fact that people don't take the time to spell-check every little piece of communication they put out for consumption does not give any credence to your portrayal of the 'retardation of society'.
People may indeed be getting dumber by the year, although I doubt it, but the fact remains that all forms of communciation have different standards (and always have) when it comes to appropriate levels of correctness, whether it be punctuation, grammar, capitalization, abbreviations, and yes, spelling. An article in a medical journal should be more formal than a novel, which should be more formal than an article in an entertainment magazine, which should be more formal than a business correspondence, which should be more formal than a love letter, etc. etc. And the fact remains that certain technological developments, most notably email, IMs and yes, blogs, have added more layers to this phenomenon by typically placing greater importance on the speed of communication over grammatical precision.
Frankly, since this is a blog for a reasonably intelligent and generally thoughtful audience, I do think that a little care should be taken when posting a comment, but that's primarily a self-interested stance since I just don't want to come across as an idiot. However, I am an anonymous coward, so who the fuck cares, really, and I'm certainly not going to get my panties in a bunch if someone fills a post with misspellings because they're in a hurry?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Audience awareness isn't the only priority, by far
A few people have tried to explain the difference between what the article says:"big words are stupid"
and the truth: "big words, used out of context, are stupid".
The story, especially the headline, fails to make this distinction. It suggests some people are retarded enough to believe a thesaurus is a book of redundant words, as opposed to similar ones. Hopefully, no one had to pay someone to state the obvious.
If I had to consider how stupid everyone else around me was (or how dumb I am) every time I opened my mouth, why say anything?
Here's what I think:
1)English teacher with spare time makes stupid program (with thesaurus data file that he lifted from someone else, who's gonna write their own thesaurus?) to state obvious point.
2)fairly useless geek site gets story and publishes 2 paragraphs on it.
3)"tech" overview site (like techdirt) cites the geek site and says basically the same 2 paragraphs with a link
4)we argue like sea monkeys about a subject that deserves pages of discourse, maybe deserving a few big words...nothing happens...everyone is right. No real opinions are made. Everyone thinks they're a friggin' genius and we all go to sleep feeling like we're Albert Einstein's/Gertrude Stein's lost love-child: "Dumbass Einstein-Stein".
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Stilted Criteria
Quoting: "Daniel Oppenheimer . . . took a handful of writing samples and used a thesaurus to replace the simple words with needlessly flowery ones"
"He created a "highly complex" version of each original text by replacing each noun, verb and adjective in it with the longest synomym."
So he intentionally Made it Look like a pretentious poser was writing. What if he used another sample of text where the Big Word was used properly, perhaps by a respected professionsl writer?
Let's not take the wrong lesson here, which most previous posters seem to be focussed on.
He did not show that Big Words make you look stupid. He showed that OVERUSE does that, just as it ruins almost everything.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Look it up, then cringe.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Audience
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: "antidisestablishmentarianism"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Nauseous/Nauseated and Ostentatious/???
First, the nauseous vs. nauseated debate highlights the fact that we speak and write a living language. Usage changes with time. What is considered correct changes, too, albeit at a slower rate. And what is considered correct is heavily affected by usage and effective conveyance of meaning. The editors of style manuals and dictionaries have recognized the shift in usage regarding nauseous/nauseated. So the occasional purist waving his/her arrogant flag demanding that we all must feel nauseated (when we'd rather feel nauseous) has very little real ammunition anymore.
Second, back to the original post, sometimes using larger words is simply more efficient speech. For instance, one poster made the following point using the word "ostentatious":
"When I am talking to an educated group of individuals, saying "That house sure does have some ostentatious woodcarvings in it." sounds about right. Sure I could have said "elaborate" or "intricate", but if I am sure my audience knows what I am saying then how do I sound like a "Pompous Ass"?"
What is the speaker really trying to say? The woodcarvings may, indeed, be elaborate or intricate, but "ostentatious" makes me think they might be excessive, flashy, over the top. The word further implies something about the person who owns the house. Perhaps he's pretentious and egotistical, maybe even flamboyant.
That's a lot of meaning packed into one word. So I would argue that if you have a complex meaning, a complex word may be the ticket after all.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Where do we go from here?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Audience
It's a good thing that ghetto English is taught in school now. Now you can sound as retarded as you dress and act. I swear that if my child ever comes home and starts that kind of crap, I will exercise the only abortion law that means anything: Abortion is legal till the age of 30. This is why I refuse to send my child to school here in GA. The board of education does not have a standard that allows the students to go beyond basics. They purposely leave the children in the dark so they cannot possibly question their lack of intelligence.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
en·tro·py n. pl. en·tro·pies
at·ro·phy n. pl. at·ro·phies
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Where do we go from here?
I believe that everyone should try to improve their understanding of their language by experimenting with words that aren't commonly used... in the proper context of course.
I viddied what you you wrote. Real horror show for some rassoodock uplifting.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: The Spell Checking Daemon
A prime example of overly-verbose. The Jihad comment, while inaccurate, was a nice touch though. It adds a new dimension to your impression of my 'struggle against misspelling'.
The whole first sentence, when I read it, gave me the image of Mr. Howell from Gilligan's Island. Just snooty and snobbish. I'm sure you were making a point with the tone, so if that was your intention, congratulations.
As to the rest of your post, I'm not going to continue beating this dead horse. Even if I do enjoy the satisfying 'thunk'. So this is it all I have to say on it:
Yes, speed is commonly favored over spelling and grammar... but that does not make it OK. You can say 'it's the way of the times', but I refuse to accept it as 'the way it is' just because others are lazy. I have two choices: go along with something with which I disagree, or fight against it.
Just because others have accepted something is not sufficient reason for me to accept it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"Ya see Bill, you don't gots the proper intelligent yet to know what the real meth-ology is that you need to know. Once you gots that, then you know that you know that you know!"
Talk about confusing. Later, he fired me after having a conversation about religion. First he called me a HONKY though. Now that's a word that's rarely used anymore, but you know what? I knew exactly what he was talking about!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"Ya see Bill, you don't gots the proper intelligent yet to know what the real meth-ology is that you need to know. Once you gots that, then you know that you know that you know!"
Talk about confusing. Later, he fired me after having a conversation about religion. First he called me a HONKY though. Now that's a word that's rarely used anymore, but you know what? I knew exactly what he was talking about!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
WTH!!!
thank you.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
two words:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I did look at a dictionary
I did look up the definition of entropy before I made my post. I even linked to the web pages from which I found the definitions I used in my defense in the post. Thank you.
As far as the correction of your usage, I still stand by that. Your statement was:
This gave the impression that your meaning was that technology has led to either 1) the decline in the use of penmanship, or 2) the decline in the quality of penmanship. In either case, 'entropy' is the wrong word.
"Caused penmanship to entropy" puts 'entropy' as the verb in the sentence. In your own dictionary Copy & Paste (feel the magic, people), 'entropy' is listed as a noun. Yes, 'entropy' means decay and decline, but the word 'entropy' itself is not the action of decline or decay. It is the decay. That's like saying "I car to work in the morning" No, I drive to work in a car. 'Car' is the noun, 'drive' is the verb.
I'm not going to use your exact Copy & Paste for 'atrophy' in my defense, because you left out the part that shows it to be a verb as well as a noun (something your dictionary did not show for entropy... yes, I found the source you used.) So here's the rest of it:
v. atrophied, atrophying, atrophies
v. tr.
To cause to wither or deteriorate; affect with atrophy.
v. intr.
To waste away; wither or deteriorate.
To imply that penmanship is not what it once was is to say that it deteriorated or withered. Although, you would not be able to just substitute 'atrophy' for 'entopy'... you would have to reword the sentence as: "technology has atrophied penmanship over the years". According to this dictionary, the verb form of 'atrophy' does not include a word-form that would properly fit the order you used.
So yes, I look at a dictionary. And yes, I can use one.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Big words without a thesaurus?
The point is that you shouldn't go out of your way to act smart, because it just backfires, especially if you do it wrong. The best way to sound smart is to actually be smart. Try and learn a few new words every day, and you can sound like Stephen Hawking in weeks.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
"It can only be annoying (nauseating, even) for somebody who has painfully learned a distinction between words to find that usage has changed and their knowledge is out of date. Think of it as language evolution in action."
I gave up when I discovered that dictionaries are now, almost exclusively, "descriptive" rather than "prescriptive". So, the big books only seek to describe how the language is used rather than how it should be used. The final straw? The (non)word "ain't" appears in most modern dictionaries--it seems it ain't true that "ain't" ain't a word.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Audience
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Entorpy vs Atrophy
::sigh:: I don't know why I have to repeat this. 'Entropy' is a noun. A system cannot 'noun'.
Also, 'atrophy' is not restricted to purely medical use. Anything that is subject to decline or degradation can atrophy.
If you wish to stick by the assertion that these words are limited to what you wrote above, then you invalidate your own argument, since as you put it: "Systems generally entophy" (which, I'm sure you meant 'entroPY). Penmanship isn't a 'system'. Penmanship is an ability or skill, and a measure of how aesthetically pleasing someone's writing is.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Let me get right down to it, I've had fun annoying you. You’re a good sport, but a poor loser. Now listen, I'd love to continue this little philosophical debate with you about the differences between the two words, but the truth of the matter is that I have simply lost interest in you and this whole discussion. My point has been made. It’s obvious you possess the mental capacity necessary to understand my point exactly... and even though you insist that I have used the wrong word, I know that I have not.
YES I KNOW THAT ANTROPHY ISN’T ONLY USED IN MEDICAL TERMINOLOGY, BUT LET ME ALSO STATE THAT ATROPHY IS ALSO A NOUN, SO INSTEAD OF BEING AN INTERNET PRICK THAT LIKES TO SUGGEST THE USEAGE OF DIFFERENT WORDS, YOU SHOULD HAVE BEEN AN INTERNET PRICK WHO REWRITES COMPLETE SENTENCES!!! YOU CATCH MY DRIFT?
Anyhow, I whole heartedly commend you on your inability to control your mouth, errr, I mean your fingers, especially on an internet message board, but here's the thing… in a perfect world we could have had this conversation face to face, let’s say, IF MODERN COMMUNICATION WASN'T IN A CONSTANT STATE OF ENTROPY.
How about this, next time you’re in sunny Detroit, feel free to drop me a line and perhaps we could finish this conversation in person. Thanks for your interest, your alternate suggestion of possible nouns, and your insistent badgering. Shalom and goodbye! No seriously, goodbye!
Love Billy C.
p.s. keep in touch sweetheart!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
and yet...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: and yet...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: and yet...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
RE: Big words as fluff
T
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
There are glaring faults in your logic. Some I've pointed out, some I haven't. But to paraphrase REM, "I've had my fun, but now it's time" to go. I've wasted enough time on this and I'm satisfied with my victory.
Thanks for being such a fun opponent.
Love, luck & lolli-pops
Gabriel
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I LIKE HOW U PUT THIS ON HERE
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Firefox vocabulary solution - psuedo tags fixe
Type "dict new word" [where new word is replaced by the new word]
Hit Enter"
Sounds like a lot of work. In Opera, highlight word, and click on "Dictionary" from the context menu. Voila. No typing or manual new tabs necessary.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: "antidisestablishmentarianism"
Not in Britain (though I prefer this style as an American). Speaking of sounding dumb when one is trying to sound educated...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
No dude, you're just plain wrong, as any former HS physics student could tell you. Nothing philosophical about it. You are, however, correct that it isn't a big deal; I wouldn't have even bothered to back up Tane if you hadn't been blustering and just admitted that you were mistaken (or ignored the comment completely).
PS: It's okay to sheepishly laugh at one's own f-ups rather than to go into some silly ad hominem tirade. I'm certain that even the most intelligent wordsmiths have made mistakes, or at least that they haven't always been totally sure of themselves before using a new word.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Unnecessary use of big words
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I've just had a shocking revelation!!
Although zilch of the flabberghastedly big words make sense or are even fiction I still find great wonder in making the blank page look a little colourful, metaphorically speaking.
So, instead of being mindbogglingly proper, let us try the plagurism of nerdiness and let thy super duper scientifical medicine warrior dude burst out from within.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Unnecessary use of big words
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Do you have the audacity to doubt my veracity and insinuate that I prevaricate?
Meaning: Are you calling me a liar? :-D
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
and your mom says hi
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
The problem with above mentioned frame-of-mind is that it has the unfortunate tendency to dumb down general use of language. Worse this social inclination has the uncanny effect of masking a far more insidious language virus – that of the normalized made-up word.
Consider for a moment the use of the word “irregardless” which technically means “not-not-indifferent to.” This word has crept into general usage because its somewhere between a $10 word that might accurately express indifference to consequence (but which is considered too complex for average use) and a 2 cent simplified phrase or two that might express the same sentiment. It is a meaningless word sure to rankle anyone who understands even a bit of logic, yet its primary user base will be the first to express contempt for anyone “attempting to appear smarter” by way of concise and or accurate word usage.
This opinion, at its heart, is one that rejects precise expression of cogent, rational thought.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
you know what makes you look dumb
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Nauseous/Nauseated and Ostentatious/???
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
inflated language
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
corn
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Dittos
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Double-plus-good
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: "antidisestablishmentarianism"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Here is an example:
"Can you put the remediation you have been employing into the defect"
The problem is that he is actually a pretty intelligent person that I respect. But really, why does he have to go off and say crap like that.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
"Can you put the reverse of the damage you have been paying some one for into the the description of the issue?".
Really!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]