Postponing Progress: Group Wants Health Studies Before Wireless Auctions
from the society-and-its-discontents dept
As if spectrum auctions didn't have enough complications, a group has filed suit in hopes of blocking an upcoming auction until long-term studies can be done on the health effects of low-intensity radiation. There's little probability that the suit will get anywhere, though it does mean that fringier elements are bold about imposing their fears on the rest of society. It's also interesting that while most can see the folly of running a long-term health study for something like wireless technology, many people don't bat an eye when similar things are called for in the area of medicine. They'll point to products like asbestos, Fen-Phen, and Tobacco as evidence that we should have been more diligent about screening for adverse health effects. But you can't make an argument by cherry picking a few bad cases from the past, unless you're willing to say that all medicines, consumer products, and technology should be subject to decades long health testing before released to the public (Otherwise, how would you know which one specifically to test, and which ones to give a quick green light to?). If you accept that for the most part technology leads to improvements in the quality of life, then a policy of holding back everything, looking for the occasional bad apple, is a bad one. That being said, there have been several health studies showing somewhat mixed results on wireless technology. It's important that we keep paying attention to them, but it's unlikely that we'll get one definitive answer, at least not any time soon. In the meantime, a policy of bravely (but carefully) embracing new technology is a good one.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Fear...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fear...
(damn fat fingers...)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A Little Too Gung Ho for Me
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[Person #1] ...And snakes!
[FDR] Well, yes, and snakes.
[Person #2] ...And spiders!
[FDR] ok yes, spiders too.
[Person #3] And Werewolves!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google scholar
s). The following link is one of the very first repsonses that I could find and due to my lack of any skills in electronics and in the medical fields I figured a post here where some with technical expertise might review the article and give give an nice and easy explaination. You know... like a yes or no answer. http://www.radres.org/rare_151_05_0513.pdf
I think we all can agree that anything in excess can kill, I mean hell I lost half my teeth to apples. So if somone decides that holding a microwave up to you ear is a bad idea I mgiht agree, but a cell phone? Those charges are (reportedly) so low that standing in direct summer sunshine cause more harm. Oh wait, yea that called skin cancer. Can anyone give a simplifed yes or no to cellular usage, even constant all day yapping.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cellphones and health
Instead of being snarky about people who question this industry - the fringier elements - your term - let the light shine on the issue. What are you afraid of? Don't get sucked in by the advertising and the mantra of so-called progress - what progress and at what cost?? It's crucial to be more critical of what is going on around us to maintain our integrity and our freedom as human beings - regardless of the issue.
The cell phone industry is a trillion dollar industry with all the economic and political clout that that kind of money gives, including buying off researchers, and mass media that chooses to shut out any public debate on this issue. Don't be naive about the what you read or hear from your friends. Dig deeper into the issue. Be skeptical of the intentions and self-preservation tactics of an industry that has that much market influence.
Some European researchers say teens of today may have alzheimers by the age of 30. Pretty scary - hopefully wrong, but let's find out. American Dr. George Carlo is a physician and lawyer who has studied this issue for more than 6 years and calls electromagnetic sickness an emerging health crisis. What would be the motivation of these researchers to critique the cellphone industry? Not much other than knowing they were doing work that might save people's lives, health, and happiness.
On the other hand, what motivation would there be for scientists to support the cellphone industry?? Hmmm more money, more accolades (because the media is in love with the cellphone industry too and will promote those who they are in sync with), prestige (for the same reasons), all the related material perks and pleasures that money can buy.
Think about it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]