It's All Fun And Games Until... Well... It's Work
from the kill-dragons-or-file-documents? dept
It's no secret that online video games can be big business. We've already discussed how there are virtual sweatshops in places like China, where people are playing online games all day long just to accumulate virtual products to sell for real money. However, it looks like one new startup is looking to take that idea in a different direction: helping to make tedious tasks more enjoyable by turning them into more of a game. The idea is to take monotonous work tasks and move them into an online game, so that they seem a bit more "fun." Of course, a boring task is still a boring task, and you have to wonder if slaying dragons in alphabetical order is going to be more fun than simply filing. Still, it is interesting to see this as being a variety of different ideas all melding together. The first is the idea of using these virtual worlds as a platform for other companies to build valuable servies. The second is the idea of figuring out better ways to get humans to do boring tasks -- such as Amazon's Mechanical Turk offering. However, as the virtual sweatshop situation has shown, a boring, monotonous job is often boring and monotonous because it's naturally boring and monotonous... and no amount of virtual avatars mixed with fun and games is really going to change that.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I can see it now
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I can see it now
Did you get the +7Int Pen to work ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I can see it now
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mary Poppins: I"n every job that must be done, there is an element of fun. You find the fun and - SNAP - the job's a game."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Basically, intelligence is comprised of two "separate but equal" lobes. These lobes are Logic and Knowledge.
If you have ever programmed in a computer language you would know that it take no small amount of logic to complete, with a very little amount of knowledge. The reason for that is because you're doing 100% of the Logic portion for the computer. A computer is 100% Knowledge. If it had no programming to follow it would spout random information endlessly. The programing is meant to immitate the Logic (and there are varying degrees of immitation).
The only way something such as "The Matrix" or "I, Robot" to happen is if we are able to somehow grant Logic to these lifeless scraps of metal. In other words we would have to give them free will. We would have to give them life. There is nothing artificial about life.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
It was as unconvincing then as it is now.
Logic is not a substitute for the ability to reason.
Reasoning machines would be the goal of an AI project.
A truly intelligent machine would have the ability to reason,
solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend ideas and
learn.
I witnessed a machine programmed in LISP determine the
rules to the game of baseball by "watching" the game.
This was in the early 80's. There are programs that
use genetics to design optimal antenna designs. It's
just tiny steps, not even baby steps... amoeba steps
perhaps, but they're relentlessly forward steps.
There are many problems, it will not be easy or happen
quickly, but I see no rational barrier to the development
of intelligent machines. The metaphysical and spiritual
arguments are more applicable to the imponderable
questions. We still won't know why we are here or who
made God but we will have some really cool machines
someday!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
AI is like the speed of light. You can always get closer to it, but you can never really attain it. There will always be something wrong with it. You just have to decide how wrong you can live with or what it is wrong that you can live with. The best way to immitate Logic is to program every conceivable situation it could ever come across, with actions to accompany them. Of course, this isn't Logic, as you're substituting it with Knowledge.
That baseball-learning computer could have been made in a way that gave it an advantage with something like that (while it has no Logic for anything else). Unless you can disprove that, then we can't assume that it has any form of Logic.
It will take (if AI is even possible, and I doubt it severely) upwards of 10,000 years to get to a reasonable level of immitation.
I could go on, but I don't have enough information. Firstly, we would need to define Logic, Life, Free Will, Knowledge, Intelligence, and many other very ambiguous terms, which would take years just to hammer out. For example, if we were able to word the defenitions correctly, we could be seen as having already "invented" AI. I'm sure we can agree that we haven't.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Respectively they correspond to logic and knowledge (not 'Logic and Knowledge'). Cells are composed of atoms...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
If you page through early photos from companies like
GM, Boeing and IBM you wil find huge rooms filled with
people performing tasks like drafing, filing, calculating...
generally pushing paper around.
The rows of people wearing green celluloid visors or
pounding away at type writers and calculators are gone.
Machines took away their jobs.
Who makes the machines? People do. Fewer people
that the number the machines displace. When I was
one of the people making the machines it didn't bother
me much. I was freeing people from mundane jobs.
Now I'm not so sure.
AI is not only possible, it's inevitable... unless humans
kill each other off first.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
maybe
Not a raise. A one time or annual bonus. Now make sure to tell them to entertain themselves or pay something off with this bonus. something to make them happy. I figure its a large amount of money going into the game, lisensing (sp) and all. probably money for every time it's installed, paid updates, computer crashes on programs and all. Just take all the money that was about to go into this and disperse it. Let them buy whatever they need, ipods to listen to while they work, or money for new tires so that they can get to work on time. Either way i think it's a better idea.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That why runescape is boring
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Btw, what was the point of this article??
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cylons.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]