Is It 1999? Google CEO Claims More Competition Leads To Higher Prices
from the economics-overturned dept
One of the telltale signs of bubblethink is when people become convinced that some basic rules of economics and business have been completely overturned. Judging from some comments at Google's analyst day, CEO Eric Schmidt seems to have taken a big sip of from a stale vat of "new economy" Kool-Aid as he claimed that competition from Microsoft and Yahoo in the advertising business could actually drive keyword prices up. The only way the price of keywords can go up is if they deliver more value per click (a greater likelihood of a click turning into a sale), or there is an increase in bidders all desperate for internet traffic. Most likely, the new entrants probably won't have much of an effect on them, since neither of the aforementioned factors are affected. That being said, Google may be forced to give publishers a greater share of Adsense revenue to prevent defections to competing products. The statement on keywords wasn't the only strange thing that Schmidt said. He claimed the company has a "limitless growth model" and that, "If this all comes together it will work as a continuous cycle". Though all this talk sounds eerily familiar, one thing has changed. The exponential hockey stick charts of yore have been rotated 90 degrees; they've been replaced with constant talk about the long tail.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Give this man a job at the Post Office
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What's google? Is it like a new myspace thing or
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What's google? Is it like a new myspace thing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I might as well tell you what it is
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dumba**es
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DISCLAIMER: Google bias
Leaving out this comment might lead to your interpretation, but when you factor in the KEYWORD --->auction
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
boo this comment system stripping my comments
Anyway, he's talking about auctions. If theres more parties interested in the auctions for keywords, higher prices will result. These higher prices will mean more revenue, because a keyword doesn't cost google any more than it did before.
The article should NOT have reiterated his more revenue comment without the auction bit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: boo this comment system stripping my comments
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: boo this comment system stripping my comments
That only makes sense if there's more competition WITHIN a single auction... not across multiple ad auctions. He made it clear that he was talking about the competition from Yahoo and Microsoft would drive up auction revenue for Google... which doesn't make sense.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Comments on Google
Some people, predigilithic (I just made that up) in their conceptual framework, just don't get the internet model.
What Google is doing is beyond genius.
I've also come to think that their 'Don't Be Evil' mission statement is a litmus test for good vs bad. People who don't get, who are suspicious of it, can't understand that something like this is actualy possible for human beings to accomplish.
Those of us who get it share in the vision and have experienced the complete mutational transformation.
I say this is evolutionary enlightenment in action.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google Payments to Publishers
Google refuses to disclose to publishers exactly how it calculates the publisher's share of a click. Therefore if Google were to say that they have increased the publisher's cut, the publisher would have to take their word for it.
Maybe if Yahoo and Microsoft disclose their percentage then Google would be forced to follow suit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Googlenomics
Why not? People think that Wal-Mart opening a store and offering to hire people causes wages to fall. It's all from the same tetbook.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]