Microsoft's Plan For The Bottom Of The Pyramid: Rent To Own
from the pay-as-you-go dept
It appears that both Microsoft and Intel are a little freaked out by Nicholas Negroponte's $100 computer concept. Either that, or they just can't stop reading C. K. Prahalad's The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid. A while back, Intel bashed the idea, which (aha!) included AMD chips, while Microsoft suggested a better idea would just be to use mobile phones (running Windows Mobile, of course) for the same purpose. Apparently that idea wasn't catching on enough, so Microsoft has cooked up a new plan: pay-as-you-go PCs. They're basing it on the success of prepaid mobile phone plans in emerging markets, and figuring they can do the same for PCs. In this case, you get the PC, but in order to use it, you need to keep "topping up" a prepaid card, or the PC defaults back to a very limited version. If you use it enough (read: pay enough), then the PC becomes yours. Of course, all this takes to destroy this plan is for a few smart hacker kids to figure out how to get around the limited version, and people will never need to pay again. Either that, or why not just wipe out the operating system and install Linux? That's what happened the last time (bubble era) someone came up with a plan to give away free PCs supported by forced advertising.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Quick!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
nice try...
By contrast, the ~$100 deal seems much more reasonable to me
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Blue $$$ of Death?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Um, simple math. The Negroponte machine has a fixed, known cost to acquire; $100. Unless somebody ponies up a hundred bucks, you got nothing. The MS plan, as I understand it, is a pay as you go plan subsidized by an ISP or a telco, with the user putting down a downpayment, then paying off the balance in access fees. In which case, they could statrt depolying this tomorrow with $400 Dells with a cheaper initial cost than Negroponte. And assuming that the subsidizing company took a longer view, they could potentially subsidize the whole nugget, making the initial cost nothing, in exchange for exorbitant access fees and/or a longer contract, which stiil would make sense in some circumstances. A microloan is the same concept with rearranged principals and hardware; it's all just moving the startup costs, which is the primary hurdle. And comparing it to PeoplePC isn't exactly valid, since even the poorest people in the US have much better access to capital; it's pretty widely known that once you get to a pricepoint of couple hundred bucks in the US it becomes affordable. PeoplePC had the misfortune of running into Dell. But on bigger ticket items, I refer you to Rent-A-Center, et al. Same concept.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
free computer...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bad Ideas are Irrelavent
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
While food is an essential, store bought bread is a convenience, a time saver, an affordable luxury in an existence of abject poverty, many things but not a necessity. And if you think computers aren't essential, trying running an industrialized nation without them. I thought the point wasn't to make people better sustenance farmers, to improve the 3rd world, but to move them into the 21st century world with the rest of us. That means ubiquitous and widespread computing power, as soon as possible, as pervasive as possible. I'm in favor of any plan that gets computers directly to consumers quickly, and as I've said, I think this idea makes sense in certain instances.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
i think he meant essential to the individual in terms of sustaining life. another problem you seem to miss is that the basic material for subsitence (good ovens, potable water, etc.) are lacking - these people aren't buying bread becuase they don't feel like making it, they are buying it because they have no other choice. they are landless, and without resources for the most part.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Industrialization without computing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Industrialization without computing.
Thinks like doctors and scientists can rise from these huts.
"Knowledge is power." -Francis Bacon
Even some things we take for granted like knowledge of sicknesses and STDs, which where hard to learn, will be at the finger tips of most of the 3rd world nations.
These kids will be able to learn what there parents couldn't. How can you not see the good in that? The target is to get the governments to buy them.
If Microsoft offered their loan system, do you not think that they would A:Cost more in the not-so-long run or B:Be no more powerful.
If A is true, than wouldn't the cheaper one be better? If B is true, than who says that the $100 laptop won't have any financing options for these governments?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Truth is...
Both profited in the past from a system under which they were the only suppliers. Technology(file sharing) and altruism(F/OSS) have since produced viable alternatives to their products, consequentially destroying their previously sheltered markets.
Both are relying on increasingly ridiculous and insulting means to avoid dealing with this reality.
Microsoft wants to keep pretending that a PC operating system is worth $200US and the RIAA wants to pretend that they are still the final arbiter of popular music availability and value.
feh.
MjM
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The Truth is...
Which, if true, means Microsoft has forgotten history. The rise of Microsoft and Intel came pretty much at the expense of IBM. In technology you always have to be ready for the possibility that a new way of doing things will destroy the whole basis of your company.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
outlaw linux
you hit the nail on the head - they want to outlaw the installation of linux - this is one on way to do it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: outlaw linux
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As opposed to giving a loan, micro or otherwise, to the same destitute person... And yeah, Negorpont's machine is only a hundred bucks, but realistically a real low end PC can be built for not much more, until you factor in the Windows premium. That and Negroponte hasn't given any indication that he would even sell his unit direct to consumers. All I'm saying is if the goal is getting PCs into people's hands, lowering the initial costs of acquisition, even if it increases the final TCO, will in many cases make sense. MS might not be the best company to implement this idea, but they're at least looking at business models, like telcos, that have figured this out. Be nice if people could get past their knee jerk MS hating and just examine the idea.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Negroponte has in fact said that no such plans exist outside of 3rd world nations. The goal is getting a PC to those:
1.) unable to afford a high end PC
2.) have a device that can work in adverse/low power conditions.
This is not knee-jerk. Microsoft and Intels reaction of scorn and amusement at Negroponte's proposals was petty and pretty transparent.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Microsoft Bashing
Thanks,
James Zadonovic
217.698.5654
---- Auto Sig v2.2 by RadiantSpace
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Microsoft Bashing
Thanks,
James Zadonovic
217.698.5654
---- Auto Sig v2.2 by RadiantSpace
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Microsoft Bashing
idiot.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Microsoft Bashing
Someone call Nvidia, I don't thing you can send an e-mail without a 7800GTX.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Look, people are talking about bringing knowledge to the people in these areas. You can talk about bread all day long, but how do we educate people at little to no profit? You can't make a PC affordable with Windows costing $70 for a license. Notice that these are crank powered, not electric because the people there do not have electricity. This project is about bringing a very useful tool to enhance people's lives through knowledge. The whole "give a man a fish, feed him today; teach a man to fish, feed him for life" analogy is what is important.
The reason people went with Linux for this project was because it meets the needs of the product (small compact OS that can run on a CD as this doesn't have a hard drive), cheap (hard to beat free) and language growth on Linux is extremely superior to Windows (see ubuntu).
The problem I see with all of the comments from everyone bashing this project is that they are trying to profit somehow in an area where there really are no profits to be had. Lets work together to build up the world, stop trying to bleed the lowest of low income nations dry, and build a WORLD where are kids have some glimmer of hope. Knowledge is the key, and if you can find a better way to bring a tool like a laptop to these third world people that can educate them on how to build a well, raise crops, to read, write and about diseases such as AIDS, hepatitis and bird flu, then come up with a better solution or stop trying to impede a pretty good idea.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The fact is, this little venture really cannot compete with Negroponte and probably is not intended to as the author of the post seems to imply.
Linux was chosen for two reasons: runs on lower cost hardware and is an open platform, making it easier to develop drivers and such...price is definitely a factor but if MS or some other company could meet criteria 1 and 2, they would probably stand as good a chance of being on that device.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Microsoft is a greedy company, but not just for money. Sure, they may not get much money off of pushing their microloan product, but they are also greedy for power.
This is just one more way for Microsoft to gain this power. It is hard to argue what could be, but Microsoft will not do these people right, it is not in a company like Microsoft to do something for pure charity, the stock holders won't allow it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]