MySpace Now A Detentionable Offense
from the well-Mr.-Sister-what-do-you-want-to-do-with-your-life? dept
Administrators of one Illinois school district say students should be "held accountable" for what they put on the internet, and are making students that participate in extracurricular activities sign a statement saying anything they put online can be grounds for disciplinary action, even if it's not on school servers or done on school time. The Supreme Court has been pretty clear that the First Amendment doesn't stop at a school's gates, and there's no question it protects students when they're off school grounds. It looks like the district is calling the statement a "pledge" to make it look voluntary, while enforcing it only on students who participate in extracurriculars would appear to be a way to circumvent the First Amendment by tying it to some voluntary activity. It's a good way to put a chill on students expressing themselves online, a nice nod to Big Brother and a waste of taxpayer resources -- but most of all, it's pointless. What will the threat of discipline do to actually stop these kids from whatever they're doing that the school district doesn't like? And if kids can circumvent school web filters with ease, it's not hard to think they'll be pretty successful at hiding their online activity from school administrators, too. Instead of having some employees troll MySpace looking for kids talking about cutting class or smoking in the bathroom, perhaps the resources would be better put to use on a remedial civics class for the school district and its board, with a heavy emphasis on the First Amendment.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Ha!
"Instead of having some employees troll MySpace looking for kids talking about cutting class or smoking in the bathroom, perhaps the resources would be better put to use on a remedial civics class for the school district and its board, with a heavy emphasis on the First Amendment. "
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ignorance.
It just makes the case for Home Schooling more solid I feel... at least I know what my kids would be learning, and not from some moron that wants to prohibit free speech instead of the true problems our teens and younger face.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ignorance.
I agree that it is very possible for the school administration to abuse this and punish kids for things they haven't even done yet. However, it also gives responsible school administrators the ammunition they need to prevent problems before they occur.
Bottom line: Anything performed proactively by authority is perceived as oppression. Anything performed reactively by authority is perceived as failure. Authority figures always lose in the public arena.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: ignorance.
Without room for improvement, authority has no purpose.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: ignorance.
"I did something wrong" becomes "They let me do something wrong."
"I was caught" becomes "I'm oppressed."
And, please, tell me...what freedoms are being eliminated? Is the school board prohibiting students from having MySpace accounts? Are they saying they cannot express themselves? No, they are not. They are saying, "If you post something on the Internet, it can be used as evidence against you should you do something 'illegal or inappropriate.'"
And, yes, I already saw your comment regarding "inappropriate." To that, I would say you are - as one saying goes - "crying before you are spanked."
Yes, it is vague. And purposely so, I'm sure. However, like all government entities in our nation, the school board must answer to their constituency, IF any such action were to ever take place.
In other words, don't get caught up in the same fearmongering you're fighting against.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think its good the school is taking a proactive step towards teaching students they are (and should be) responsible for their online activity; however, tying this "pledge" to extracurricular activities is rather confusing. Why should the football team need to sign a WWW agreement? This agreement should be tied to classes that use / allow internet access in the classroom, library computers, and the schools servers. If students are surfing along to blantantly offensive (read hate groups, porno, etc.) at school, then punishment might be in order, but what children do at home is the parents responsibility.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: parents respnsibility
Couldn't have said it better myself. This statement is key in the upbringing of children. The government (at any level, local, federal, etc) should not impose laws (rules) to tell me how to raise my child.
Examples like this push me further to look into homeschooling my child when she reaches "schooling" age.
BAH!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Whats irritating
Another good point.. Why not let them vent at myspace... then anybody can see when they are about to shoot up thier school...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
IDIOTS!
What would the average teen do when told not to do something - ha.
These teens simply log onto MySpace and now their names are now teenboi15 and wazzupgirlz90.
Think wazzupgirl's serving any detention time? Not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
pfft
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: pfft
But this pledge bullshit? Wtf, it's bad enough they limit our school surfing. But now they want to become the communist dictator? Some free country the USA is turning out to be...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: pfft
Well, junior, if you know of a country that has greater freedom, why don't you share it with us...after you move there of course.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: pfft
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Its the Constitution, stupid!
btw- the stupid above refers to those administrators, not you!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
schools have too much power
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: schools have too much power
Umm - make that 2 sites counting this one...
Back to the topic - First, the school should pledge to fire all good-for-nothing tenured teachers, and pledge to stop hiring teachers based on their coaching records, and pledge to start actually *teaching* instead of just "preparing students for mandatory testing" (translation: ensuring the school gets fully funded by state & federal bullcr@p programs).
Message to school boards: STOP TRYING TO SOCIAL ENGINEER MY KIDS!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pledge
This pledge is so wrong on many ways. What about the kids not into extracurriculars? It seems this pledge is only going to punish the kids who do extracurricular activities at school and if you start taking kids away from those activities wouldn't it hurt the school?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Here's a Thought
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Attention for detention
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
color me stupid
Politicians cannot replace parents.
Those that try fail.
Kids with no parents (not all, but a high percentage) end up in legal trouble, suicides, abuse, drugs, etc.
Return family values of mommy, daddy, brother, sisters, with an extended support system of aunts, uncles, grandparents and whatnot, and this problem becomes moot.
Besides, what are the kids doing that is so horrible...other than being kids?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: color me stupid
my dad turned out fine, mabey even better off for it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Parental Resposibility
Shouldn't parents also be held accountable for thier childrens actions? The few times I got into troble when my Dad was in the Air Force, they didn't only talk to me but they talked to my Dad!! Man did I get it then, an I learned big time not to screw around.
Both my daughters knew that if they screwed up it not only effects them but also myself an my wife. Parents need to be involed with all aspects the thier kids lives not just when they see them. Raising your kids doesn't stop at the door or when they're 18, it's a life time commitment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Parental Responsibility?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is not good
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is not good
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Welcome to 1984. I wonder if they read that in school anymore... wouldn't want those kids to see the light!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It WILL teach them the FIRST and BEST lesson of th
If you don't share your "Real Life" personal information with strangers OR people that think they know better than you then neither one can bother you in "Real Life".
Problem solved!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Okay
Because kids are stupid.
Because nobody has a bigger complex with the idea that, "it'll never happen to me."
That's why.
From the time a kid leaves school to the time the kid gets home, a school can be held responsible for the child's actions. That includes what happens to a child.
Remember when you would have two kids meeting down the street behind the 76 station to fight. Well, the school is responsible if a kid ends up in the ER.
Sure there are plenty of other serious issues that more kids face, violence, drugs, drinking, sex, smoking, etc. But kids get kicked completely out of school for some of those actions. Why? All masked behind the "making it safer for other students."
Blame parents. I am sure there is some group of PTAers that took a school board to court over some myspace.com issue, and the school is not willing to go down that road again.
If there is a problem, it is always someone else's fault. So now that school is trying make the kids responsible. Which is not a bad idea, it's just that it is not the only idea they should have.
Myspace started for 18 and over. You could get around that with simple math, i.e. my birthdate plus 4 years makes me 18! YEAH!
Well now it is 14 and over. I think profiles of kids that are under 18 should by default, and with no ability to change it without lying, should be set to private. If a kid lies to be 18, well then the child is responsible for lying. It does not get rid of the problem, it just adds one tiny step of protection.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Get over it...
Second, for those who didn't read the article, it says they "won't regularly search students' sites, but will monitor them if they get a worrisome tip from another student, a parent or a community member." It's a step in the right direction, IMO.
The part I don't understand is why it's limited to students participating in extracurricular activities. It's almost as if the school is saying that students who participate in extracurricular activities are more likely to cause trouble than non-active students. I would think this would be the other way around.
Anyway, this rule will cause as much trouble as denying a 13-year old girl telephone privileges for a week. It might get some whining, but in the end it's really not that big of a deal. The kids will get over it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Get over it...
What constitutes "inappropriate?" Whose standard? The principal? The school board? A jury of one's peers?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Get over it...
As I said, this requires responsible administration and not some half-cocked "regime."
And, actually, come to think of it, your reaction is somewhat like their reaction to "problem students." The administration hasn't actually disciplined anyone yet, and you're already crying foul. How is that different than what they want to do?
The Internet is a public arena. And just as a political figure must answer to statements he/she makes in the public arena, so too should anyone else, regardless of age, gender, religion, or any other label.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Get over it...
Would you want everyone to wait until someone came in and shot up your kids school to take action?
I take issue not with intervention when a kid makes Columbine-like threats but rather, who is going to decide what is inappropriate and better yet, what standard are they going to use? I suppose if its the WORLD WIDE WEB, then the standard should be the world's standard, not Old Principal Jones in po-dunk city public school!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Get over it...
For one very good reason, any law, rule, regulation, etc. can be abused. If you start taking exception to any law made before it is enforced improperly, then all laws are a problem. You have no idea what the schools system has proposed, the media is not exactly pius or complete in their reporting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Get over it...
As to why do this with only those signed up for extracuricular activites? My gues would be that some parent who's an attorney would get in their faces and damage their budget with litegation if they made it a requirement for attending a public school.
So, you want to be in band or play football or meet in the Chess club? Sign this please.
I wonder if this school allows the Boy Scouts to use their facilities, despite no atheists or gay kids can join.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Give an inch, and they'll take a mile
The real antagonist is the people who are afraid. Myspace isn't the reason little girls get raped, it's just one of many mediums that allows it to happen. Little girls have been raped just because they were playing softball and a sick fuck walked by and decided that he'd kidnap her later.
Remember the first internet scare? Nobody was allowed to go in chat rooms, because PEDOPHILES were there!!! OMFG!
It seems that everytime something happens to one person, everyone else suffers because of it. When those in charge claim they're making changes for 'our safety', they actually intend to use and abuse more of the power we voluntarily give them.
I think if everyone would calm down and stop being a bunch of pussies, they'd realize that statistically, the real world is a much more dangerous place than Myspace.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Give an inch, and they'll take a mile
The point of the rule, as I see it, is not to protect the kids who are involved in online activity. The point is to simply state, "If you threaten someone's life online, you can be punished for it." (Granted, not on that scale, but the principle is still the same.)
There is no violation of rights here. Where is it stated that I have the right to state publicly that I wish to commit a crime and not be held accountable when said crime is committed?
(E.g. If I were to state in this post that I was going to kill you - and you felt that this threat could be genuine based on past experiences you've had with me - would you say that the FBI could not use said post in its case against me? I think you would be glad to have "evidence" of the threat.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Give an inch, and they'll take a mile
"High school students are going to be held accountable for what they post on blogs and on social-networking Web sites such as MySpace.com."
"such as" implies an example. There it is.
This isn't about some kid threatening to kill someone or threatening to cause someone harm. This is about some ultra conservative mindset wanting to outlaw dancing in his town. Everybody FOOTLOOSE!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Give an inch, and they'll take a mile
However, I'm *pretty* sure it didn't say anything about dancing...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ridiculous
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Ridiculous
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I can't wait for this fight
a shoe rule. It says they can only wear closed heel and toe shoes with no raised heels. after sending one to school in birks because her feet hurt I get a call from a secretary to say that she violated policy.
I asked to speak to the principal and was told I needed an appointment. I walked to the school and
sat waiting for an opening. Glory be she could see me. The first thing she does is thank me for bringing appropriate shoes. 15 minutes later she not only learned I didn't bring shoes she also learned what it is like to argue the constitution with somebody who knows how to read the original document. She also learned that I was ready to allow my daughter to disregard every rule I considered unnecessary. She tried that lame old chestnut about trying to foster a safe environment and of course pointed out that my daughter had signed a student pledge. I told her that
she should have gone to law school because minors
can't consent to any contract. I tell you when the time comes for this fight I hope I get an old teacher of mine, just because I blew them off doesn't mean I didn't learn anything.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is this new anyway?
This rule would at least help teach students to keep temselves privatye on the web, hiding thier real details. (or of course having multiple names)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Is this new anyway?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Is this new anyway?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As for the program itself. Sure it all starts out benign. We're only going to take action against serious infractions, say smoking in the bathrooms, seriously threatening another student or teacher. And wh're not going to be constantly monitoring, we'll only act off tips and informants.
Somewhere along the line those students deemed "higher risk" will be set aside for closer attention. Of course increased monitoring of a select few is profiling and discrimination, so out of fairness we'll just start monitoring all students a little more closely.
And the list of "actionable offenses" will slowly increase over time (hey we saw/heard you kicked your dog last night).
Anyone who thinks it won;t happen this way is simply being naive. It's the same arguments we saw when they started all these Zero Tolerance programs (oh we won't do this or that, and that sort of thing could never happpen) and now you see kids getting kicked out for aspirin or nail clippers.
And this program won;t be any more successful than the War on Drugs, Zero Tolerence, the War on Terror, or the instantaneous freedom by ousting Saddam Hussein
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Online bullying
USA-Today: "Schoolyard bullies get nastier online"
Techdirt: Online bullying gets nasty
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Forget the schools, where are the parents?!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I agree with the school district!
I am grateful that the school district acted quickly and decisively in this issue. It was a rare case of the school officials thinking clearly,
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I agree with the school district!
I'm sorry, but you seem confused. This is NO WAY has anything to do with the article. So please leave now and save yourself the trouble.
The school district is WRONG. They are threatening to take away a student’s activities in school, including suspension and expulsion, because of things they post on a PUBLIC website.
If they posted on Myspace or any other blog IN SCHOOL, then it would be an issue. But to say they have the right to monitor what their students are doing on their OWN free time is illegal. They don't have the right as public institutions.
My former HS has done something similar but LOGICAL. They have monthly assemblies with officials from the local PD and FBI explaining how to spot pedophiles and how to stay safe online. They don't THREATEN their students by saying if they are caught posting pictures of them on the beach, they can't join Leo Club. They explain to the students that people may look ok but end up being bad when you meet them.
THAT is what should be happening, not this "It’s all Myspace and GTA's fault" bullshit.
Thank you for pissing me off.
-Mike
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
good animation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
fuck u bitches
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
can you say "ridiculous"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wow
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]