Recording Industry Apparently The New Master Of The German Police
from the we-are-in-charge-now dept
The IFPI, the international equivalent of the RIAA, has announced that German police have charged 3,500 eDonkey users with criminal copyright infringement for uploading files on the network, a charge for which they face the potential of five years in jail. It probably shouldn't be too surprising that the group has gotten the police to do its dirty work, since German lawmakers don't appear to be too different to their US counterparts in giving the entertainment industry exactly what it wants, but it is a little surprising to see the head of the IFPI using the terms "we" and "our" to describe the actions, giving the impression that he's also the spokesperson for the German police. While the RIAA's run around with its make-believe police force, why should the IFPI bother when it can get the German police -- who evidently have nothing better going on, like fighting actual crime, rather than protecting outdated business models -- to do it for them?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
first!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There, I said it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Question about site title
The use of the words "free service" suggests that you are doing people a huge favor that they should feel lucky not to be charged for. I have to say that sounds quite odd in light of the fact that you are basically just repurposing other sites content and adding some editorial opinion.
Also, the fact that you call it a free service suggests that it might not always be free -- are there any plans to eventually charge for the "free service"?
Thanks
Dave
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Question about site title
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Question about site title
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Question about site title
Heh. Yes, we've got lots of subscribers and the business has been growing rapidly, but thanks for your concern.
A few points on this:
1. Our customers subscribe not for "links" but our ability to find what's important *and* to analyze the stories in terms of how they impact the customers directly. We're an analyst firm, that provides customized daily analysis for our clients.
2. What we post to the front page is quite different than what we write for our clients -- which is very targeted to how the news impacts them specifically. Also, if you look at the actual service page, you'll note we provide a lot more, including tools for managing the information and analysis.
3. Considering how happy our customers are with the service, it seems that what we do is a bit more advanced than what a 10-year-old could do in about five minutes. Otherwise, why would they hire us and keep renewing their contracts? They find value in the analysis.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Question about site title
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Question about site title
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Back on topic!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
...like actually fight crime?
Think of what the newspaper Headlines would be if the Police busted a ring of 3,500 criminals in the real world. Just because something happens behind the computer doesn't make it any less illegal than breaking into a record store and stealing the cd's.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ...like actually fight crime?
Except in the case of downloading/uploading files, no one looses anything. Everyone gains the data. The prolem is the idea that the RIAA is losing sales because of this, but the real reason they are losing sales is due to their shitty business practices and shitty products. File sharing is just their scapegoat.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: ...like actually fight crime?
The matter of how one transports stolen property doesn't matter, it's still theft.
Stealing a car and using it yourself is just as illegal as stealing a car and having it shipped overseas via boat, or via air.
Stealing a CD from a factory and selling it is illegal. Stealing the CD from a record store is also illegal. Why should stealing the same CD from the internet be legal when the other forms of theft are illegal?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: ...like actually fight crime?
You've misunderstood. It's not about transport, but whether or not anything is missing. If something is stolen, it means something is gone. In this case, nothing is gone... so it's not stolen.
That doesn't mean it doesn't break copyright laws -- but it's not stolen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: ...like actually fight crime?
copyright law is not the same as real property law; it is a limited monopoly right which has acceptions like fair use, first doctrine, idea/expression dicotomy and (ha ha ha)limited times....
I thoroughly agree with the sense of this article - it takes something like 5,000 downloads to displace one sale - they should get on with the real crime like domestic violence and child abuse - when they have that under control then let them help out the mass media corporations, until then, the police are meant to be serving the people...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ...like actually fight crime?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thanks Robbinsjr
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
value of Techdirt
Human filtered aggregation of topical material is valuable in itself.
It's silly to pretend an RSS filter, even a really intelligent NLP parsing expert system could match the application of a human editor. Most RSS filters are just keyword matchers. Look at how badly spam filters still fail. Less chaff than Digg, less dupes than Slashdot, more focus on the technology stuff. Works for me.
Now, about those pesky Nazis - privoxy, Ants, Tor, nuff said.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Whatever, Copyright Infringement is against the law, but it is NOT stealing!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
While the RIAA, and lawyers, may have to say that "Sharing" is not stealing. I don't. I work for no music company, no government, etc. To me the morality of it makes it stealing.
You are purposely taking something that doesn't belong to you. You didn't buy the song even though you know that is what you are suppose to do. To me that is STEALING. You can call it "borrowing" or "Sharing" or anything else you want, it's still stealing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Real morality requires truthfulness.
Nope, it is still there.
I know no such thing.
Shouting won't make you right.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]