Funny, The Telcos Weren't So Against Regulations When It Helped Them

from the hands-off-now? dept

It's getting somewhat annoying to see just how partisan the network neutrality debate has become, with both the telcos and the internet folks spinning the rhetoric in the debate well beyond the actual issues. Both sides are making statements that have little basis in reality, but it still seems like the claims from the telcos and their supporters that this is about "keeping regulatory hands off the internet" are the most silly. Remember, these are the telcos. They've benefited from billions of dollars in subsidies and regulations in their favor over the years -- regulations that granted them monopoly rights of way and helped them get rid of most of the competition. That, again, is the real issue. If there were true competition that would allow others to enter the market, then there wouldn't even be a debate about network neutrality, because no firm would realistically be able to break network neutrality without a serious backlash. So, the next time someone says this is all about keeping regulators away from the telcos, remind them that regulations built these telcos into the position they're in today -- and ask them if they're willing to trade in all the benefits they got from those other regulations?
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    OhYeah, 23 May 2006 @ 7:39pm

    Another First Post!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      DittoBox, 23 May 2006 @ 7:48pm

      Re:

      Stop this idiocy please.

      Yelling first post and then walking off is useless, and clutters these forums.

      Can the guys at TechDirt require allow for registration to post? I'd glady do so, that way anyone who posts something like this gets banned.

      Stop being an idiot.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        I, for one, 23 May 2006 @ 8:16pm

        Re: Re:

        > Another First post!
        >>Stop this idiocy please.

        Aww look Ditto, now you've just encouraged him to do it some more.
        Let us not ridicule young OhYeah like grumbly old men, no, let us congratulate him. We should respect the lightning wit, razor sharp reflexes and determination that has placed the clever chap where he rightfully belongs, at the top of the pile where he truly is the center of our attention and consequently validated as a worthwhile human being. Who are we johnny-come-lately runners up to comment?

        I think that was pretty damn fine first post you know. You beat us all!

        link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    I, for one, 23 May 2006 @ 7:58pm

    commodity bandwidth would make it irrelevant

    "... there wouldn't even be a debate about network neutrality, because no firm would realistically be able to break network neutrality without a serious backlash"

    Which has always been my economic argument all along. Seems I'm not really grasping the complexity of this debate. I think it's not about their rights to route data how they like so much as it is about lack of choice for the end user. If I had a multi-homed link with a choice of 100 providers to send my traffic through I couldn't care less about it. Perhaps the compromise is staring us in the face, give them the right to compete in whatever way they like in a truly open market by breaking up the telcos with antitrusts?

    Unfortunately the whole thing is based on a false dichotomy, the myth of bandwidth as a finite resource. Bandwidth scarcity is an entirely manufactured concept. Flick a few switches to activate the "dark fiber" and the throughput could step up an order of magnitude overnight with no additional outlay. Of course if you actually reduced bandwidth to its commodity price all the jokers charging $20/mo for a crappy DSL would be out of business faster than you can ping localhost.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Patrick Mullen, 24 May 2006 @ 6:37am

      Re: commodity bandwidth would make it irrelevant

      And one issue is that while it may just require a flick of a few swwitches to activate the "dark fiber" it does cost a bit of money to light it and keep it lit. The fiber was dark because there wasn't demand for it, now, quite a bit of that inventory is gone.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Tony, 23 May 2006 @ 8:17pm

    Why is it funny?

    Why is this funny? What foolish, publicly held company would not be FOR legislation that increases its bottom line and AGAINST legislation that is decreases its bottom line? Oh yeah... every business that intends to turn a profit.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 May 2006 @ 8:22pm

    Re: first posts + dsl providers going outta busine

    first off - how can you say

    Of course if you actually reduced bandwidth to its commodity price all the jokers charging $20/mo for a crappy DSL would be out of business faster than you can ping localhost.

    when the fact that AOL is still miraculously (or more likely, cursedly) still in business?

    and now about the first posts thingy - why make people have to register to post? if people wanna post stupid shit, they'll post it having to register or not - and the ones that still do post, will be the especially stupid ones. - its a fucking forum, people post stupid, senseless crap - get used to it...

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 May 2006 @ 9:28pm

    speaking of which

    7th post --- lol

    And hey where is Dorpus

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    LoudNClear, 23 May 2006 @ 9:47pm

    AOL and Bandwidth

    I think AOL serves a purpose. In many ways I see others using it as a Standards of Learning test. Those who have any idea about the internet do not use it. I work closely with the American public as a service technician for a major retailer, and one of the first questions I ask is "How do you connect to the internet?" if the response is "AOL", I keep everything I am explaining to them elementary until they show me they know more.

    While the telcos have definately futureproofed themselves by laying lots of "dark fiber" getting them to light it up would be harder than pulling a non-sedated lion's tooth. They make their billions by selling bandwidth to repackagers who in turn sell it to consumers. They would loose the investment they put into the work and material if they gave it away. Short of federal regulation making them use all available bandwidth, it won't happen. Not that I am defending them, I simply see their position. If I had laid out fortunes to create a data transportation backbone, I would defend that money too. It is possible to get as fast a connection as you really want from most telcos... if you are willing to pay for it. you might need a business license and do a little lying, but its possible.

    So until I can afford a T3 line into my house, leave AOL and its victems alone. They can stay off my bandwidth and tie up their phone line all they like. My Ex used to say uneducated people are worthless, but she still wanted her gas pumped and her McMuffins in the mornings.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Scott, 24 May 2006 @ 5:31am

      Re: AOL and Bandwidth

      "If I had laid out fortunes to create a data transportation backbone"

      There is a flaw in this logic, the telco's were granted 200 Billion dollars of taxpayer money for this. I don't see a grand investment on their end.

      If someone took $2000 from you and promised you something, wouldn't you make damned well sure you got what you paid for or your money back? The telco's got your money, didn't deliver, and in fact have been allowed to consistently raises taxes and fees on those same lines. You have just been robbed, the gov't knows who did it, but doesn't give a crap.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    LoudNClear, 23 May 2006 @ 9:49pm

    more on telcos

    I know they make money elsewhere too...

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    gheez, 24 May 2006 @ 1:39am

    why AOL

    Man, why is it everytime network neutrality/ bandwidth topics are brought up AOL somehow ends up on these posts? yes, we all know that AOL is crap for us savvy users, but a blessing for the computer retards OK? Ok then. Please.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Tim, 24 May 2006 @ 5:52am

    "Subsidies"

    Mike, allowing a company to raise its rates is not a subsidy. And enacting a bad regulatory scheme tomorrow is not a good way to atone for having enacted a bad regulatory scheme last year.

    Network neutrality rules would not only apply to telcos. It would also apply to cable companies, and to any new entrants down the road. In fact, it's quite likely that if a competitive alternative to the telcos and cable companies emerges, it's quite likely that they'll do everything they can to throw up regulatory roadblocks in the way of that new competition. That will be much easier if we've already conceded that the FCC has the power to regulate the Internet.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    William C Bonner, 24 May 2006 @ 6:33am

    Net Neutrality vs. Censorship

    I believe that it was on this blog that I read an excellent piece about network neutrality being in the telco's best interest. Primarily because as long as they are just passing data back and forth and not examining it, they are not responsible for it.

    At the point that they are filtering, and some kiddy porn gets transferred over their network, then it's concievable that they should be liable for trafficking in kiddy porn.

    On a different but related subject:

    Free Internet is a question I've had for some time now. Does free internet really mean free web browsing? With the Free part being funded by advertisments in the web browser? When I'm connected to the internet, I'm using a web browser, but I'm also using Instant Messenger, SSH, SMTP, IMAP (primarily over SSH) and who knows what other protocols that don't have a way of inserting ads into the datastream.

    A web connection that doesn't allow me to bring up a secure socket connection to my primary web server isn't getting me very much, but I don't understand the economics of free.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Patrick Mullen, 24 May 2006 @ 6:35am

    "Monopoly Power." Where? From my point of view, I can get broadband from my cable company, broadband from a phone company (fiber to the home coming soon to your neighborhood, with fiber to the curb also) DSL service, in Texas, they are doing the worlds largest broadband over power lines (10mbs both up and down, which is better than my current cable connection) EV-DO through numerous wireless companies, and who knows what coming soon.

    Just what monopoly are we talking about?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Scott, 24 May 2006 @ 7:04am

      Re:

      Duopoly would be a better choice of wording, there are only 2 real backbones, cable and telco. Whether you have fiber, DSL, or EV-DO from a phone company, it is still the same backbone connecting you to everyone else. Opening the number of connection types offered does nothing to eliminate control.

      Broadband over power-line is still in trial phase in the US because of ham radio interfernce, which has potential repurcussion to public emergency response equipment.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      ebrke, 24 May 2006 @ 7:10am

      Re:

      Texas is not the entire country. DSL is limited by your distance from CO. Fiber to the curb won't be available for years, if ever, in many locations. And basically, we're still talking cable or phone company. Duopoly--far from unlimited choice.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Turk, 24 May 2006 @ 8:25am

    Government regulation

    Just a couple of facts to get in the way of your logic. Cable companies are responsible for 60% of the residential broadband internet connections versus the 40% provided by telcos. That network was not built with government subsidies. It was built with private investment and initiative.

    The common carrier laws that applied to telcos did not apply to cable and cable flourished. In fact, it was only because cable began pushing broadband service that the telcos decided to provide DSL. Telcos sat on that technology for years, opting instead to charge more money for T-1 lines. The competitive market for broadband was created by people who wanted to do more.

    If you're going to point to the technology stagnation that occurred under government regulation of the telcos as an example of successful regulations, you might think again.

    Broadband is where it is today because of free markets, not in spite of them.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Scott, 24 May 2006 @ 10:34am

      Re: Government regulation

      "Telcos sat on that technology for years, opting instead to charge more money for T-1 lines. The competitive market for broadband was created by people who wanted to do more. "

      Thus proving that Telco's can not be relied upon to play nice or fair. Also you are talking residential broadband when discussing penetration. The networks that Google , Yahoo, and most other big corp.'s run on are Telco. So where do you think QoS will occur? I expect something like this:
      Google router>>telco router w/QoS>>backbone.
      Comcast has already been hit for degrading VoIP, seems they aren't so altruistic. As have Cox and Adelphia, though those reports haven't been substantiated to a degree I would rely on too much.

      I am sorry, but it is amazing that just days before or after AT&T is re-incorporated, the head of SBC(not renamed quite yet) is talking about restrictions on their backbone.
      I also think that once 1 side realizes they can get away with it, the other will as well.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Turk, 24 May 2006 @ 1:12pm

        comcast Allegation

        "Comcast has already been hit for degrading VoIP, seems they aren't so altruistic."

        Can you cite a source for that allegation? If so, you're the only person engaged in this debate at any level who has been able to come up with two US (non-Canada) examples of anything like this happening.

        There has been exactly one case investigated and found to have actually occured - Madison River. That was settled - with a fine to the company - under existing law.

        If you are able to demonstrate any other instance, I'd love to hear it. That's the problem with the legislation - it's a solution in search of a problem.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Scott, 25 May 2006 @ 6:09am

          Re: comcast Allegation

          Sorry the FCC investigation was into blocking VPN connections, in my opinion just as bad, you still can't do what you want with your connection(assuming it is legal).

          However, I will stand by the fact that Comcast is getting blasted(I used to be a Comcast customer, and still know many people who are), for this fact: Comcast VoIP works rather well, vonage and skype on their network have many issues.

          link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Mike (profile), 25 May 2006 @ 2:23am

      Re: Government regulation

      Just a couple of facts to get in the way of your logic. Cable companies are responsible for 60% of the residential broadband internet connections versus the 40% provided by telcos. That network was not built with government subsidies. It was built with private investment and initiative.

      Well, that's one way to look at it... though it conveniently leaves out the franchise issue, and the fact that no one else can go out and lay wires these days if you're not a cable or telco. So, you mean "private investment and initiatives" teamed with gov't granted monopolies. That last part is important.

      If you're going to point to the technology stagnation that occurred under government regulation of the telcos as an example of successful regulations, you might think again.

      You are misunderstanding my point here. Nowhere was I saying that the past regulations were "successful." I was saying that the telcos are in the position they're in now, in large part, thanks to regulations. I don't consider that a success story. So for them to say "hands off" is ridiculous. They were perfectly happy with the hands for a while.

      All I'm saying here is that the situation isn't nearly as simple as either side is making it out to be. Claiming it's about hands off is ridiculous when the telcos have benefited greatly from the hands in the past -- often through promising specific things in return, which they're now trying to get out of providing.

      link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.