Plaxo Spam Patented... By Someone Else
from the oops dept
We've had our problems with Plaxo's business model in the past, but to find out that someone else had already patented their business model and is now suing them for it, seems a bit silly. It's yet another case where we have to ask what is the societal benefit here? What was wrong with letting the various competitors in this space simply compete in the market, rather than granting a monopoly to one of them?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
benefit
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: benefit
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: benefit
Actually he meant Societal, which is defined as "Of or relating to the structure, organization, or functioning of society."
You really should look up the meaning of a word you don't recognize or understand before trying to correct someone else's grammar. Always remember, it is better to sit in silence and appear ignorant, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt. Sorry about the flame and for getting way off topic but this is a pet peeve of mine. People in general should think, get their facts straight and only then make comment.
On Topic:
This story would have been humorous if the company holding the patent was going to use it to stop the spammer industry. Sadly there is no such luck with this type of "bottom feeding" industry.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But this is a GOOD thing!
Now, if someone would just patent online drug spam, mortgage spam and a couple of others, I'll no longer need a spam filter!
Yay Patents!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh and don't forget the fact that Monopolies are I
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Oh and don't forget the fact that Monopolies a
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
START a precedent?!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
About Plaxo SPAM....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
USPTO Strikes Again
Wow, this patent was granted in 2004...
I can't imagine there isn't prior art out there.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: USPTO Strikes Again
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: USPTO Strikes Again
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Plaxo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Plaxo
Companies offering things for Free raises big question marks in my mind. Nothing is free. Free to me means that I will get adware or Spam for compensation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Plaxo
without the risk of spam, adware or other
noxious content.
It's sad that in the end the nice people get
lumped in with the jerks and everyone is under
suspicion.
I don't know which I despise more, companies that
spam or people that buy from companies that spam.
There must be a lot of overweight, dysfunctional,
midget penises in need of a low interest rate
mortgage and cut-rate prescription drugs in this
world
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
question
[ link to this | view in chronology ]