Techies Robbing Companies With Procurement Fraud
from the more-common-than-you-may-think? dept
These days, with the publicity surrounding the Enron trials, the idea of companies setting up elaborate schemes using shell corporations isn't that new. In the Enron case, it appears to have been a corporate effort to do so. However, there are plenty of cases coming to light of employees setting up shell corporations to rob their own employers. Five years ago, we wrote about a "Business Development" VP at Cisco who was caught setting up an elaborate scheme of shell companies and fake venture capital firms to divert plenty of Cisco money into his own bank account. When accused, he first claimed it was simply his effort to "think outside of the box," which is an interesting defense. However, Baseline Magazine has a collection of articles suggesting that this type of activity is actually more common than many believe, and that it's often the IT staff, with their huge budgets, that are able to set up such procurement fraud scams. The article has four examples of techie procurement fraud, including the NY City Medical Examiner's office using procurement fraud in the wake of 9/11 and the Canadian Department of National Defense robbing tax payers blind through shell corporations. However, perhaps the most stunning is the story of the restaurant chain Buca, which was the victim of procurement fraud from two top execs, who were so blatant as to set up one such shell corporation in the same building as Buca's headquarters and then billed Buca for the office space.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
... NOW THAT TAKES GUTS.. HATS OFF
still laughing ......
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
BS
I never lost anything other than a PC and a telephone stolen in a robbery.
One thing that I have noticed is that many "tekkies" are very young when they are hired and do not have proper oversight. I you hand a kid that isn't ready too much responsibility and then fail to guide them, do not be surprised when the F-up.
Oversight of expenses is a management function and when it is not exercised, a management failure. The sad part is that many managers don't know enough about technology to properly oversee this function.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Things I have heard
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Very few new tricks in the world
All the best, Jerry
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Does techdirt really believe that article?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Does techdirt really believe that article?
Um, I think you are taking this a bit too seriously. We did say it was "rampant" but that it may be happening more than people know.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Does techdirt really believe that article?
Well, I have built systems for 30 years, and it is this arrogance from what is an overhead department (IT) that has given us a bad name. As for fraud, I have seen quite a bit over the years, and IT is a good area to do it in because the systems are usually guarded by 'knowledge squirrels' who think IT knowledge is power, and not that IT is there to serve the company.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]