Hollywood's Own Paper Says Congress Shouldn't Protect Hollywood
from the gotta-hurt dept
Didn't see this one coming. Hollywood's hometown paper, the LA Times, has an editorial today entitled: We Aren't All Pirates, talking about how Congress shouldn't pass laws that clearly go beyond the basic intent of copyright law: to encourage the creation of new art. It points out that many of the new laws being pushed by the entertainment industry break the delicate balance set up by copyright, and are clearly just about protecting one particular business model. The editorial notes that passing these laws "would impinge on devices that have legitimate uses and steer the development of technology, cutting off some innovation." None of this should be surprising to anyone around here... but to hear it out of the LA Times is a bit surprising. How far has the entertainment industry pushed its luck when even its local paper is pushing back?Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
How Far...?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Umm, I'm sorry, but the movie Industry doesn't own the LA Times, if the LA Times stated that they support eating kittens would techdirt post it? There is a wide variety of opinions, and I think what will cause change in copyright laws is not some newspaper with a small group of people babbling, but with the consumers, which, in the movie industries' eyes is potential profits.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
No, they don't... but they do advertise a lot in the paper. Also, it's pretty typical for local newspapers to support the views of the big local industries. So, it absolutely is significant that the LA Times would say this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The times and the kittens
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The times and the kittens
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The times and the kittens
GOM
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The times and the kittens
Not a word of it was salient, cogent or coherent, but 218 words in one sentence is 218 words in one sentence. i couldn't do that.
i think i now know why you really lost your job at the Times as a copy editor.
And Hemmingway rolls in his grave.....
-- dan
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They Eat Kittens?
BTW...Those small groups of people babbling are consumers too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Eating Kittens
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee
My favorite Lee-ism is STILL when she was in the control room at JSC when they had one of those Mars missions tooling around the surface. She asked the mission commander if it would be possible to drive the rover over to where Neil Armstrong landed.
Ahhhh... Can you smell the democracy?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
IMO
All in favor, say aye
Thx.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
LA Times and kittens
What the hell IS your point?!?!? The movie industry doesn't own the LA Times, so why is that important? Nobody said they owned them, only that the entertainment industry's own *local* paper didn't support their propaganda.(emphasis mine, duh)
And at least someone is making some noise about this. That's how consumers find out about this and realize that there are other points of view than what they might have previously considered.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So, it absolutely is significant that the LA Times
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I question the L.A. Times
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Editorial
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cabin Boys on Parade
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh Danny boy, the pipes are ....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]