The Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc Fallacy Meets The Video Game Industry

from the that-makes-sense,-wait,-no-it-doesn't dept

As anyone who has studied debate or logic knows, it's easy to present reasonable sounding, causal arguments that are total nonsense. For example, a student might say "I never studied for tests, yet I still got A's, therefore it would be a mistake for me to study". Or, as another example, someone might say, "There's been a lot of innovation in the video game industry, and this industry enjoys strong IP protection, therefore strong IP protection is necessary to induce innovation." That happens to be the argument that Adam Thierer makes, as he calls out intellectual property skeptics for not attacking the video game industry. On its face, the argument isn't necessarily wrong, but Thierer does little to prove it's right. He states that the first-mover advantage wouldn't be enough to return profits to game makers, given the high expense of developing a game. But even in the absence of simple piracy, game makers copy each other all the time. There are plenty of derivative, first-person shooters getting made all the time. That hasn't stopped the good ones from being profitable, even though they're being copied. Almost any popular game has imitators, though people still feel they get value by paying up for the good ones. And then there's the fact that the game industry has emerged to have tightly-controlled platforms that aren't interoperable. It's just not as easy to copy and share an XBOX game as it is a CD, rendering plain vanilla piracy less of an issue. So if this strong IP argument is to be made, one needs to explain why other aspects of the video game industry don't explain its success before concluding that it necessarily needs IP to innovate.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Jul 2006 @ 3:26pm

    I'ma N U M E R O U N O!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Monarch, 28 Jul 2006 @ 3:39pm

    Jeez, I buy plenty of games. But I got burned too many times with buying before trying. Now I will torrent a new game I'm thinking about, to test it first. However, if it has Star Force, I WILL NOT EVEN TORRENT IT, LET ALONE BUY IT!!!!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    jsnbase, 28 Jul 2006 @ 4:36pm

    I love The Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc Fallacy!

    They rocked the Meadowlands in '74.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. icon
    rijit (profile), 28 Jul 2006 @ 6:53pm

    Thats because game makers share innovation, to a degree. Unlike Hollywood, who hoard IPs like a desperate mother fending off an attack on her children.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Me, 29 Jul 2006 @ 7:40am

    I have no idea what this article is trying to say...Xbox 360 has the best try before you buy system with demos over xbox live. That's a hell of a lot easier (and legal) than downloading torrents.

    Also, is there a moderator who watches these posts and if there is, can they delete any post that has any sort of reference to being First. I really hate wasting the second it takes to read someone saying that they're first!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 30 Jul 2006 @ 6:12am

    Re: First

    First to reply

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 30 Jul 2006 @ 4:44pm

    Re: I love The Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc Fallacy!

    That was Star Castle, asshat ;D

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Sanguine Dream, 31 Jul 2006 @ 9:21am

    This may be because...

    owners of video game IP know that there's no real point in crying infringement every time a similar game is released by a competitor. Take the Grand Theft Auto series. After the third title came out and was a huge success there were imitators (State of Emergency, The Getaway, and other "open ended" mission based games afterwards) that tried to piggyback on its success. Well State of Emergency nor The Getaway did as well as GTA despite both having sequels. The original hot games will stand out and the clones will fall to the wayside.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    jsnbase, 31 Jul 2006 @ 10:53am

    Re: Re: I love The Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc Falla

    You might be right. I was pretty wasted....

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.