Yet Another Massive Diebold Security Flaw? What A Surprise...
from the shocking dept
It's only been a couple of months since the last major Diebold e-voting machine security flaw, so apparently it's time for yet another one. Bryan writes in to point out the report from the Open Voting Foundation, who took apart a Diebold machine to show how easily it could be hacked. At this point, it's difficult to know how to respond. These reports seem to come out every few months -- and Diebold's response has been just to laugh it off or make life difficult for election officials who question the accuracy of their machines. While there's some evidence that Congress is finally starting to pay attention, it's truly amazing that politicians have ignored such reports for so many years. Safe and accurate elections should be the goal of everyone -- and to think that it's been treated as a laughing matter by those who create the machines, despite report after report of flaws and questionable behavior, is really disturbing.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Slot machines have better regulation?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Slot machines have better regulation?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
hello
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: hello
At least with paper ballots there is a paper trail. A way to physically prove the votes are the votes and if someone commits fraud it is much more likely to trace it back to the source.
It is dangerous to do this with an electronic machine. Please read: http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2004/11/the_problem_wit.html and educate yourself before you make ignorant comments.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: hello
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
no worse than paper methods
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: no worse than paper methods
Enough said.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: no worse than paper methods
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
useless anyway
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: useless anyway
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
diebold
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Diebold
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I don't understand...
This would be slower but it would allow less chance for fraud.
This method would still be manual but the results would be quicker than the old punch method.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
More of the same...
More articles written, no action.
More people overlooking the real issues, all with no action.
If you idiots put half the effort from sitting online complaining about things into organizing and taking REAL ACTION, something would possibly get done. Then again, that'd be real work, something you obviously can't do if all you can muster is some anger in online posts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: More of the same...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: More of the same...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Who benefits?
I would much prefer pencil and paper, hand counted balloting - if it meant every vote counted, a paper trail was established for verification, etc.
The real reason for the controversy over the voting machines by Diebold and others is to distract us from asking why 3 million votes went uncounted in 2004 - predominately the votes of those statistically more likely to vote democrat, although the uncounted ballots included military absentee ballots (good thing our kids in uniform are in Iraq to spread democracy, wink, wink)
eVoting? - Hard as it is to believe, there are actually poor people who can't afford computers actually living in the US (and actual citizens!)
Vote by Mail - postage paid, is the way to go.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Who benefits?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Clint Curtis / Ray Lemme
Regardless e-voting is both illegal and unconsitutional because no one can ever count votes and no one can verify results. Its all done in the black box and only diebold and GOP really know what goes on in there.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't vote.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Today
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
the sad part is.... people actually think that way, and they hold alot of power
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So sad
I didn't think so.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So sad
We need a name, upon which, to hang all that ignorance.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I Don't know about the rest of you . . .
Now if the receipt is used for any purpose other than to placate the public, I don't know.
There exist a problem with secret ballots, if your vote is secret, then there is no audit possible.
Paper ballots are damn easy to create.
Electronic ballotsare just as easy to fabricate.
The act of counting itself has oversight problems.
What way can you think of to make sure your vote is not tampered with? Make it public record. But this creates a whole host of privacy issues. So what do you want more? accuracy and accountability? Or privacy?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So sad
The hanging chads were 1/4 of the story in florida. Polling places which turned away african americans, with a helpful dose of GOP cuban intimidation, and the illegal removal of tens of thousands of african americans from the polls for allegedly having criminal records even though they did not is also a point.
The discrepancies between the voting in rural florida counties and statistical analysis and polls should also concern you since those counties used scan voting systems which were sent to the very easily hackable gems tabulator.
To try to claim voting reform as an attempt to cheat the GOP out of rightful votes is plain absurd.
The real world is beyond rush, fox, o'reilly and the corporate media (cnn, msnbc, abc, etc.) and itis not broadcast because it would challenge the GOP and DEm's corporate masters
[ link to this | view in chronology ]