Bored Reporters Scouring YouTube For Anything Semi-Popular To Write About
from the just-add-youtube dept
Last month, we noticed the slight oddity of news reports randomly picking up on a video that was somewhat popular on YouTube, and using that as the basis of a news article (which, in turn drove a lot more publicity to the video -- leading to the false conclusion that it was YouTube that made it popular, rather than mainstream press coverage about the fact it was on YouTube). Anyway, now that we've hit the slow news days of August, it appears that reporters just can't resist dipping into the YouTube popular videos pile to come up with a random story. Earlier this week, it was the 72-year-old man making YouTube videos, and today it's apparently "How to be a chav." It used to be that reporters actually had to keep their ear to the internet buzz circle to figure out what was going on. Now, apparently they just have to peek at the top videos on YouTube and their story is basically written.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
MEH
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Right on.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silly_season
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Right on.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Right on.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Isn't This Still Citizen Media?
When mainstream reporters look towards the blogosphere or YouTube, it gives the ordinary citizen a chance to be heard, if what they have to say is powerful enough. This is what makes Digg so powerful, that the ordinary user can vote and it attracts broader coverage to the issue.
This doesn't mean that we shouldn't see investigative journalism, but given the amount of content that newspaper's have to produce, it isn't realistic to expect them to not get inspiration for stories from what other journalists are writing about.
Maybe this does beg the question of whether or not the mainstream coverage drove the hits or whether it was the community, but if the community wasn't impressed to begin with, then it wouldn't have caught a reporters radar.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Isn't This Still Citizen Media?
Davis, there's a difference between picking up on actual trends and just grabbing whatever video happens to be at the top of the popular list that day...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Alternative View
How about: "Bored Bloggers Scouring Bored Reporters Scouring YouTube For Anything Semi-Popular To Write About for something to write about"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Yup. But for a very good reason. It's an *interesting* and different story that reporters seem to suddenly be taking the top random video from youtube and writing up a whole article about it. Part of what we do here is media criticism, and this story certainly fits. However, you'll notice the focus of the two stories are totally different. The reporters are simply grabbing the top video and saying "look, this is interesting." What we did was pick up the actual trend and point that out. That's quite different.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
AdverseE lol...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This Just In!
Film at 11.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dual Headlining
The first part of the headline was the main story, with the second part being a short blurb about a video, and of course, the video itself.
Every time the headline was interesting, I read the story, realized it had nothing to do with the video, then watched the video.
It was definitely a good way to drive visitors to the site, as it got me. repeatedly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So what?
Sometimes that's more interesting than AOL digging for gold! Like that IS news? Please AOL has been digging for years.
But a young audience attending a geriatric video/blog is quite interesting. Alot of kids don't have any adults who are concerned, let alone some 72 year old in England. In some small way he must be providing something for them that they can get no other way. Whether it's wisdom, advice, or just plain old nostalgia.
YouTube is a mirror of society. If you don't like it or agree, it's thgere nonetheless and one cannot denie its popularity. Since the advent of YouTube, instead of knocking it, lets see what happens.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Social Reporting
[ link to this | view in chronology ]