Companies Don't Want To Put Jobs Online... So Some Politicians Want To Force Them To
from the how-nice dept
Stories about "resume spam" are not new. For years, we've heard reports of companies saying that whenever they post open jobs online they got inundated with resumes (often from unqualified individuals). In fact, a few years ago we wrote about how job candidates were standing out by going back to sending paper resumes to companies. This is backed up by a new report today that claims many HR professionals are purposely not putting open jobs online, saying they'll only get inundated. The timing on this report is interesting, given that a bunch of well-meaning politicians in New York tried to pass a new law that would required a bunch of companies to put their job openings online. It basically would have put that requirement on any company over 20 employees that does work for the state or receives any kind of subsidy or tax break. Luckily, though, for those companies' HR departments, the governor vetoed the bill.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Stupid. Stupid. Stupid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Stupid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What's next?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What's next?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What's next?
That'd be a complete 180 since they're already forced to do the opposite; it's called affirmative action.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jobs Online
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Jobs Online
That was a short post for a Gov. Worker. What did you do with the other 5 hours a day you waste?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RTFA, idiots.
Dan: It's not posting resumes online, it's posting job listings. "stupid stupid stupid" indeed (Nick pointed this out too).
Transit60: If someone is smart enough to figure out how to spoof an automated resume sorter, they're probably smart enough to warrent talking to for a menial government job, wouldn't you think?
It has been a long standing law that US government jobs must be posted in a "suitably trafficked public forum" and posted for a set duration (whcih varies by state). The reason for this is to allow people SOME insight into the way their government works. That's why every time a school wants to hire someone new it shows up in your local newspaper. I for one think that if my tax dollars are supporting a company, they should actually have to publically announce that they're hiring, rather than just hiring a friend of a current employee. Just a thought, but wouldn't YOU rather that YOUR tax dollars went to the more qualified candidate?
Notice this wasn't for EVERY company, just those receiving special dispensations from the government. I support it, even if it requires someone to actually do their job (HR departments!)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Circumvention
e.g. HR gathers 300 resumes, interviews 10, Hiring Manager carefully follows process by interviewing 6. Then he declares his friend from a prior job the most qualified.
doodaa..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I mean, online postings are fine and well, but every company should have a paper-route as well... Forcing people to place them online would just make it to where they would forget about paper-applications, or on-site application processes. I can still think of no more effective way to de-humanize the process.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
GET OFF YOU SOAPBOXES AND READ!
Mike, shame on you for misrepresenting the true nature of what's happening.
BTW, there is one huge benefit to doing this that people have glossed over, it helps to fight nepotism and cronism. If anyone remembers the good old days of Tamminy Hall when basically the entire family of politicians were given jobs, you can see where this system is much more equitable to the general population. The point of the legislation is/was to give all job hunters an opportunity to apply for a job, not just those in the inner circle who may hear about a job through the old boys network.
I'm surprised TechDirt would take a position that is so enti-technological advancement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
PITA
Still, that's the government's choice if it wants to mandate putting its jobs online. Gov't really should not be in the business of forcing all companies to post all of their job openings online. Many will anyways but it shouldn't be a law. Plus how much taxpayer money will be spent enforcing this ordinance? Quite a lot, I'm sure.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]